Wolfson Unit for Endoscopy, St. Mark's Hospital, Imperial College London, London, UK.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Nov;70(5):835-45. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.01.001. Epub 2009 Jun 25.
Therapeutic endoscopic procedures are technically challenging and have higher complication rates than diagnostic procedures. Less-experienced practitioners are significantly more likely to have a complication, yet there is very limited evidence of the efficacy of training in such procedures.
To evaluate the effect of knowledge-based teaching and hands-on, simulation-based skills training in 4 therapeutic endoscopic procedures: control of nonvariceal upper GI bleeding, polypectomy, stricture dilation, and percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tube insertion.
Single-blind, randomized, controlled trial.
Nationally accredited therapeutic endoscopy course.
Participants were randomized into groups to assess the effect of knowledge-based teaching and into subjects or controls to assess skills-based training. All delegates had an initial knowledge and skills assessment by blinded experts. Subjects received one-half day of hands-on skills training, whereas the controls did not. All delegates were retested on their procedural skills.
Knowledge was assessed by using a multiple-choice questionnaire. Practical skills were assessed using station-specific checklists and a global score.
Twenty-eight participants were randomized. There was no significant effect of knowledge-based teaching on the participants' practical skills or initial multiple-choice questionnaire score, although there was a trend toward improvement. There was a significant improvement in the subjects compared with the controls in the performance of polypectomy, control of upper GI bleeding, and esophageal dilation. There were no significant differences for PEG tube insertion.
The 2-person nature of PEG tube insertion may have resulted in performance improvement despite a lack of training.
Hands-on skills training significantly improved performance in 3 therapeutic modalities. Knowledge-based teaching alone did not have a measurable effect. These results strongly support the benefit of intensive hands-on, simulation-based courses for endoscopic skills training.
治疗性内镜操作具有一定技术难度,且其并发症发生率高于诊断性内镜操作。经验相对不足的医生更有可能出现并发症,但关于此类操作培训效果的证据非常有限。
评估基于知识的教学和基于实践、模拟的技能培训在 4 项治疗性内镜操作中的效果:非静脉曲张性上消化道出血的控制、息肉切除术、狭窄扩张术和经皮内镜下胃造口术(PEG)置管术。
单盲、随机、对照试验。
经国家认证的治疗性内镜课程。
参与者被随机分为评估基于知识的教学效果的组和评估技能培训效果的受测者或对照组。所有学员均由盲法专家进行初始知识和技能评估。受测者接受为期半天的实践技能培训,而对照组则不接受培训。所有学员均接受操作技能的再次测试。
知识通过多项选择题问卷进行评估。实践技能通过特定站点的检查表和总体评分进行评估。
28 名参与者被随机分组。基于知识的教学对学员的实践技能或初始多项选择题问卷得分没有显著影响,尽管有改善的趋势。与对照组相比,受测者在息肉切除术、上消化道出血控制和食管扩张术的操作中表现有显著改善。PEG 管插入术无显著差异。
PEG 管插入术的 2 人操作性质可能导致尽管缺乏培训但仍有操作水平的提高。
实践技能培训显著提高了 3 种治疗方式的操作水平。单纯基于知识的教学没有产生可衡量的效果。这些结果有力支持了强化实践、基于模拟的内镜技能培训课程对内镜技能培训的益处。