Department of Pediatrics and Epidemiology and Biostatistics Unit, Institute for Maternal and Child Health, IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy.
BMC Pediatr. 2011 Feb 10;11:15. doi: 10.1186/1471-2431-11-15.
Vomiting in children with acute gastroenteritis (AG) is not only a direct cause of fluid loss but it is also a major factor of failure of oral rehydration therapy (ORT). Physicians who provide care to paediatric patients in the emergency department (ED) usually prescribe intravenous fluid therapy (IVT) for mild or moderate dehydration when vomiting is the major symptom. Thus, effective symptomatic treatment of vomiting would lead to an important reduction in the use of IVT and, consequently, of the duration of hospital stay and of frequency of hospital admission. Available evidence on symptomatic treatment of vomiting shows the efficacy of the most recently registered molecule (ondansetron) but a proper evaluation of antiemetics drugs largely used in clinical practice, such as domperidone, is lacking.
To compare the efficacy of ondansetron and domperidone for the symptomatic treatment of vomiting in children with AG who have failed ORT.
METHODS/DESIGN: Multicentre, double-blind randomized controlled trial conducted in paediatric EDs. Children aged from 1 to 6 years who vomiting, with a presumptive clinical diagnosis of AG, and without severe dehydration will be included. After the failure of a initial ORS administration in ED, eligible children will be randomized to receive: 1) ondansetron syrup (0,15 mg/Kg of body weight); 2) domperidone syrup (0,5 mg/Kg of body weight); 3) placebo. The main study outcome will be the percentage of patients needing nasogastric or IVT after symptomatic oral treatment failure, defined as vomiting or fluid refusal after a second attempt of ORT. Data relative to study outcomes will be collected at 30 minute intervals for a minimum of 6 hours. A telephone follow up call will be made 48 hours after discharge. A total number of 540 children (i.e. 180 patients in each arm) will be enrolled.
The trial results would provide evidence on the efficacy of domperidone, which is largely used in clinical practice despite the lack of proper evaluation and a controversial safety profile, as compared to ondansetron, which is not yet authorized in Italy despite evidence supporting its efficacy in treating vomiting. The trial results would contribute to a reduction in the use of IVT and, consequently, in hospital admissions in children with AG. The design of this RCT, which closely reflect current clinical practice in EDs, will allow immediate transferability of results.
ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01257672.
儿童急性肠胃炎(AG)的呕吐不仅是导致液体流失的直接原因,也是口服补液治疗(ORT)失败的主要因素。在急诊室(ED)为儿科患者提供护理的医生,通常会在呕吐是主要症状且出现轻度或中度脱水时,开具静脉输液治疗(IVT)。因此,有效的对症治疗呕吐,将显著减少 IVT 的使用,从而缩短住院时间和减少住院次数。目前有关呕吐对症治疗的证据表明,最近注册的药物(昂丹司琼)是有效的,但对于多潘立酮等在临床实践中广泛使用的止吐药,缺乏适当的评估。
比较昂丹司琼和多潘立酮对接受 ORT 失败的 AG 患儿呕吐的对症治疗效果。
方法/设计:在儿科 ED 中进行的多中心、双盲随机对照试验。纳入年龄在 1 至 6 岁之间、呕吐、疑似临床诊断为 AG 且无严重脱水的患儿。在 ED 初始 ORS 给药失败后,符合条件的患儿将被随机分配接受:1)昂丹司琼糖浆(0.15mg/kg 体重);2)多潘立酮糖浆(0.5mg/kg 体重);3)安慰剂。主要研究结局为接受对症口服治疗失败后需要进行鼻胃管或 IVT 的患者比例,定义为第二次 ORT 尝试后出现呕吐或拒绝补液。在至少 6 小时内,将以 30 分钟为间隔收集与研究结局相关的数据。出院后 48 小时将进行电话随访。将纳入 540 名儿童(即每组 180 名患者)。
该试验结果将提供关于多潘立酮疗效的证据,尽管多潘立酮缺乏适当的评估和有争议的安全性,但它在临床上的使用广泛,而昂丹司琼在意大利尚未获得批准,尽管有证据支持其治疗呕吐的疗效。该试验结果将有助于减少 AG 患儿 IVT 的使用,从而减少住院人数。该 RCT 的设计与 ED 中的当前临床实践紧密结合,将使结果能够立即转化。
ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT01257672。