Fedorowicz Zbys, Jagannath Vanitha A, Carter Ben
UKCC (Bahrain Branch), Ministry of Health, Bahrain, Box 25438, Awali, Bahrain.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Sep 7;2011(9):CD005506. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005506.pub5.
Vomiting is a common manifestation of acute gastroenteritis in children and adolescents. When untreated it can be a hindrance to oral rehydration therapy, which is the cornerstone in the management of acute gastroenteritis. Evidence is needed concerning the safety and efficacy of antiemetic use for vomiting in acute gastroenteritis in children.
To assess the safety and effectiveness of antiemetics on gastroenteritis induced vomiting in children and adolescents.
We searched the Cochrane Upper Gastrointestinal and Pancreatic Diseases Group Trials Register comprising references identified from comprehensive electronic database searches and hand searches of relevant journals and abstract books of conferences.The search was re-run and is up to date as on 20 July 2010.
Randomized controlled trials comparing antiemetics with placebo or no treatment, in children and adolescents under the age of 18, for vomiting due to gastroenteritis.
Two review authors independently assessed trial quality and extracted data.
We included seven trials involving 1,020 participants. Mean time to cessation of vomiting in one study was 0.34 days less with dimenhydrinate suppository compared to placebo (P value = 0.036). Pooled data from three studies comparing oral ondansetron with placebo showed: a reduction in the immediate hospital admission rate (RR 0.40, NNT 17, 95% CI 10 to 100) but no difference between the hospitalization rates at 72 hours after discharge from the Emergency Department (ED); a reduction in IV rehydration rates both during the ED stay (RR 0.41, NNT 5, 95% CI 4 to 8), and in follow-up to 72 hours after discharge from the ED stay (worst-best scenario for ondansetron RR 0.57, NNT 6, 95% CI 4 to 13) and an increase in the proportion of patients with cessation of vomiting (RR 1.34, NNT 5, 95% CI 3 to 7)). No significant difference was noted in the revisit rates or adverse events, although diarrhea was reported as a side effect in four of the five ondansetron studies. In one study the proportion of patients with cessation of vomiting in 24 hours was (58%) with IV ondansetron, (17%) placebo and (33%) in the metoclopramide group (P value = 0.039).
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Oral ondansetron increased the proportion of patients who had ceased vomiting and reduced the number needing intravenous rehydration and immediate hospital admission. Intravenous ondansetron and metoclopramide reduced the number of episodes of vomiting and hospital admission, and dimenhydrinate as a suppository reduced the duration of vomiting.
呕吐是儿童和青少年急性肠胃炎的常见症状。若不进行治疗,呕吐会妨碍口服补液疗法,而口服补液疗法是急性肠胃炎治疗的基石。需要有证据证明使用止吐药治疗儿童急性肠胃炎呕吐的安全性和有效性。
评估止吐药对儿童和青少年肠胃炎所致呕吐的安全性和有效性。
我们检索了Cochrane上消化道和胰腺疾病组试验注册库,该注册库包含从全面的电子数据库检索、相关期刊手工检索以及会议摘要书籍中识别出的参考文献。检索于2010年7月20日重新进行且是最新的。
比较止吐药与安慰剂或不治疗,针对18岁以下儿童和青少年因肠胃炎所致呕吐的随机对照试验。
两位综述作者独立评估试验质量并提取数据。
我们纳入了7项试验,涉及1020名参与者。一项研究中,与安慰剂相比,茶苯海明栓剂使呕吐停止的平均时间缩短了0.34天(P值=0.036)。三项比较口服昂丹司琼与安慰剂的研究的汇总数据显示:立即住院率降低(相对危险度0.40,需治疗人数17,95%可信区间10至100),但急诊科出院后72小时的住院率无差异;在急诊科停留期间静脉补液率降低(相对危险度0.41,需治疗人数5,95%可信区间4至8),且在急诊科出院后随访至72小时时也降低(昂丹司琼的最差-最佳情况相对危险度0.57,需治疗人数6,95%可信区间4至13),呕吐停止的患者比例增加(相对危险度1.34,需治疗人数5,95%可信区间3至7)。复诊率或不良事件无显著差异,尽管在五项昂丹司琼研究中的四项报告腹泻为副作用。在一项研究中,静脉注射昂丹司琼组24小时内呕吐停止的患者比例为(58%),安慰剂组为(17%),甲氧氯普胺组为(33%)(P值=0.039)。
口服昂丹司琼增加了呕吐停止的患者比例,减少了需要静脉补液和立即住院的人数。静脉注射昂丹司琼和甲氧氯普胺减少了呕吐发作次数和住院人数,茶苯海明栓剂减少了呕吐持续时间。