Suppr超能文献

氯吡格雷和心肌梗死试验(COMMIT)中早期β受体阻滞剂在急性冠状动脉综合征中的应用是否影响了加拿大的临床实践?来自全球急性冠状动脉事件注册(GRACE)的见解。

Has the ClOpidogrel and Metoprolol in Myocardial Infarction Trial (COMMIT) of early β-blocker use in acute coronary syndromes impacted on clinical practice in Canada? Insights from the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE).

机构信息

Division of Cardiology, Terrence Donnelly Heart Centre, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Am Heart J. 2011 Feb;161(2):291-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.10.034.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The COMMIT/CCS-2 trial, published in 2005, demonstrated no net benefit of early β-blocker (BB) therapy in acute coronary syndromes (ACS). We sought to assess the short-term impact of this landmark trial by comparing the use of early BB therapy in patients with a broad spectrum of ACS before and after 2005.

METHODS

Using data from the Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events and Canadian Registry of Acute Coronary Events, we compared the rates of BB use within the first 24 hours of presentation in the periods 1999 to 2005 and 2006 to 2008, after stratifying patients by the type of ACS (ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction [STEMI] and non-ST-segment elevation ACS [NSTEACS]) and clinical presentation.

RESULTS

Of the 14,231 patients with ACS, 77.7% received BB therapy within 24 hours of presentation (78.5% and 77.4% in the STEMI and NSTEACS groups, respectively). The early use of BB declined in the STEMI group (80.3% to 76.7%, P = .005) but increased in the NSTEACS group (75.4% to 78.9%, P < .001) after 2005. Long-term BB use, higher systolic blood pressure, and higher heart rate were independent predictors of early BB use. Conversely, patients who were female, older, Killip class >1, and had cardiac arrest at presentation were less likely to receive early BB. Multivariable analysis showed a trend toward lower use of BB among patients with STEMI (adjusted odds ratio 0.76, 95% CI 0.57-1.00, P = .055) and a trend toward more frequent BB use among patients with NSTEACS (adjusted odds ratio 1.22, 95% CI 0.96-1.55, P = .11) after 2005. The temporal trends in the early use of BB differed between patients with STEMI and patients with NSTEACS (P for interaction with period <.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients with STEMI or NSTEACS were treated with early BB therapy. In accordance with the COMMMIT/CCS-2 trial, patients with lower systolic blood pressure and higher Killip class in the "real world" less frequently received early BB therapy. Since the publication of COMMIT/CCS-2, there has been no significant change in the use of BB in patients with STEMI or NSTEACS after controlling for their clinical characteristics.

摘要

背景

2005 年发表的 COMMIT/CCS-2 试验表明,急性冠状动脉综合征(ACS)患者早期使用β受体阻滞剂(BB)治疗并无净获益。我们旨在通过比较 2005 年前后 ACS 患者广泛使用早期 BB 治疗的情况,评估这一具有里程碑意义的试验的短期影响。

方法

我们使用全球急性冠状动脉事件注册和加拿大急性冠状动脉事件注册的数据,根据 ACS 类型(ST 段抬高型心肌梗死[STEMI]和非 ST 段抬高型 ACS[NSTEACS])和临床特征,比较了 1999 年至 2005 年和 2006 年至 2008 年期间患者在就诊后 24 小时内使用 BB 的比率。

结果

在 14231 例 ACS 患者中,77.7%在就诊后 24 小时内接受 BB 治疗(STEMI 组和 NSTEACS 组分别为 80.3%和 77.4%)。STEMI 组中早期使用 BB 的比率下降(从 80.3%降至 76.7%,P=0.005),但 NSTEACS 组中增加(从 75.4%增至 78.9%,P<0.001)。长期使用 BB、更高的收缩压和更快的心率是早期使用 BB 的独立预测因素。相反,女性、年龄较大、Killip 分级>1 级和就诊时发生心搏骤停的患者不太可能接受早期 BB 治疗。多变量分析显示,STEMI 患者中 BB 的使用率呈下降趋势(调整后比值比 0.76,95%CI 0.57-1.00,P=0.055),NSTEACS 患者中 BB 的使用率呈上升趋势(调整后比值比 1.22,95%CI 0.96-1.55,P=0.11)。2005 年后,STEMI 患者和 NSTEACS 患者早期使用 BB 的趋势不同(与时期的交互作用 P<0.001)。

结论

大多数 STEMI 或 NSTEACS 患者接受了早期 BB 治疗。与 COMMIT/CCS-2 试验一致,在“真实世界”中,收缩压较低和 Killip 分级较高的患者较少接受早期 BB 治疗。自 COMMIT/CCS-2 发表以来,在控制了患者的临床特征后,STEMI 或 NSTEACS 患者中 BB 的使用并没有显著变化。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验