Suppr超能文献

猪细胞外基质支架在重建泌尿外科中的应用:生物力学性能的离体对比研究。

Porcine extracellular matrix scaffolds in reconstructive urology: An ex vivo comparative study of their biomechanical properties.

机构信息

Department of Urology, Mid-Western Regional Hospital, Limerick, Ireland.

出版信息

J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2011 Apr;4(3):375-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2010.11.005. Epub 2010 Nov 16.

Abstract

Functional reconstruction of the human urinary bladder has been attempted by replacing defective bladder tissue with tissue-engineered xenogenic extracellular matrix (ECM) scaffolds. However, experimental studies that demonstrate the effects of implanted ECMs on important biomechanical properties such as total bladder capacity (TBC) and compliance (C) are lacking. In the current study, the effects of ECM scaffold surface area (SA) on TBC and C was assessed, ex vivo, in an ovine model (n=5). TBC and C were measured at pressures (P) of 5, 10, 15 and 20 mm Hg prior to performing a 3×3 cm (9 cm(2)) partial cystectomy defect. Equal-sized 3×3 cm (9 cm(2)) and larger 6×6 cm (36 cm(2)) urinary bladder matrix (UBM) scaffolds of porcine origin replaced the 3×3 cm cystectomy defect, and TBC and C were re-recorded for comparative analysis. The results showed that TBC decreased by 39.6%±0.005% (122.9 ml±15 ml, p<0.05) and C by 38.9%±0.51%, (ΔP=0-5mmHg, p<0.05) in ovine bladders reconstructed with 3×3 cm UBM scaffolds compared to their native values. It was also found that TBC increased by 25.6±0.64% (64.2 ml ± 8.8 ml, p>0.05) and C by 24.5±0.43% (ΔP=0-5mmHg, p>0.05) in the 6×6 cm UBM scaffold group compared to the 3×3 cm UBM scaffold group; however, these values were not statistically significant. The present work demonstrates that a fourfold increase in ECM scaffold SA relative to its intended defect does not lead to a significant improvement in TBC and C values.

摘要

已尝试通过用组织工程化的异种细胞外基质 (ECM) 支架替代有缺陷的膀胱组织来实现人类膀胱的功能重建。然而,缺乏实验研究来证明植入 ECM 对总膀胱容量 (TBC) 和顺应性 (C) 等重要生物力学特性的影响。在本研究中,我们在绵羊模型中(n=5),通过离体实验评估 ECM 支架表面积 (SA) 对 TBC 和 C 的影响。在进行 3×3cm(9cm²)部分膀胱切除术缺陷之前,在 5、10、15 和 20mmHg 的压力 (P) 下测量 TBC 和 C。用尺寸相同的 3×3cm(9cm²)和更大的 6×6cm(36cm²)猪源膀胱基质 (UBM) 支架替代 3×3cm 的膀胱切除术缺陷,并重新记录 TBC 和 C 进行比较分析。结果表明,与天然值相比,用 3×3cm UBM 支架重建的绵羊膀胱的 TBC 降低了 39.6%±0.005%(122.9ml±15ml,p<0.05),C 降低了 38.9%±0.51%(ΔP=0-5mmHg,p<0.05)。还发现,与 3×3cm UBM 支架组相比,6×6cm UBM 支架组的 TBC 增加了 25.6%±0.64%(64.2ml±8.8ml,p>0.05),C 增加了 24.5%±0.43%(ΔP=0-5mmHg,p>0.05);然而,这些值没有统计学意义。本研究表明,与预期缺陷相比,ECM 支架表面积增加四倍并不会导致 TBC 和 C 值的显著改善。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验