Suppr超能文献

经喉罩插管型快速气管内插管(Fastrach™)与 Air-Q™ 盲探气管插管的比较。

Comparison of blind tracheal intubation through the intubating laryngeal mask airway (LMA Fastrach™) and the Air-Q™.

机构信息

Department of Anesthesia, The University of Iowa Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine, Iowa City, IA, USA.

出版信息

Anaesthesia. 2011 Mar;66(3):185-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06625.x.

Abstract

This study assessed two disposable devices, the LMA Fastrach™ and the newly developed supraglottic airway device, the Air-Q™, as a conduit for tracheal intubation in 154 healthy adults undergoing elective surgery. Using a non-inferiority approach, the primary outcome measure was successful tracheal intubation within two blind insertion attempts. Successful blind intubation after two attempts was achieved in 75/76 (99%) of the patients in the LMA Fastrach group vs 60/78 (77%) in the Air-Q group (95% CI for the difference 12-32%, p<0.0001). Fibreoptic intubation was used to assist the third attempt. The rate of successful intubation after three attempts was 100% in the LMA Fastrach group and 95% in Air-Q group. The single-use LMA Fastrach appears superior compared with the Air-Q, as a conduit to facilitate blind tracheal intubation.

摘要

本研究评估了两种一次性设备,即 LMA Fastrach™ 和新开发的声门上气道装置 Air-Q™,作为 154 名接受择期手术的健康成年人进行气管插管的导管。采用非劣效性方法,主要结局指标是两次盲插尝试内成功进行气管插管。在 LMA Fastrach 组中,76 例患者中有 75 例(99%)在两次尝试后成功进行了盲插,而在 Air-Q 组中,78 例患者中有 60 例(77%)(差值 95%CI 为 12-32%,p<0.0001)。使用纤维支气管镜插管辅助第三次尝试。在 LMA Fastrach 组中,三次尝试后的插管成功率为 100%,在 Air-Q 组中为 95%。与 Air-Q 相比,一次性使用的 LMA Fastrach 似乎更优,可作为辅助盲插的导管。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验