Suppr超能文献

一项卡马西平辅助治疗部分发作性癫痫患者的疗效、安全性和耐受性的随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究。

A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of adjunctive carisbamate treatment in patients with partial-onset seizures.

机构信息

Medical University of South Carolina, Charlestown, South Carolina, USA.

出版信息

Epilepsia. 2011 Apr;52(4):816-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1528-1167.2010.02960.x. Epub 2011 Feb 14.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of adjunctive carisbamate treatment at 800 mg/day and 1,200 mg/day in patients with partial-onset seizures (POS).

METHODS

Patients ≥ 16 years of age with an established diagnosis of POS for ≥ 1 year and uncontrolled on one to three antiepileptic drugs were enrolled. Eligible patients remained on stable doses of prescribed antiepileptic drugs for an 8-week pretreatment baseline phase and were then randomized (1:1:1) to receive carisbamate (800 mg/day or 1,200 mg/day), or placebo, for a 14-week double-blind phase. Primary efficacy endpoints were percentage reduction in POS frequency and responder rate (patients with ≥ 50% reduction in POS frequency) during the double-blind versus baseline phase.

KEY FINDINGS

Five hundred forty-seven patients were randomized; 540 composed the intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis. Four hundred thirty-four patients (79%) completed the study. The median percent reduction from baseline to treatment phase in POS frequency was: 21% (placebo); 30% (carisbamate 800 mg); 36% (carisbamate 1,200 mg), and 32% (combined carisbamate doses). The combined carisbamate dose group was not significantly different from placebo for the median percent reduction of POS frequency (p = 0.20) or responder rate (p = 0.18). Therefore, the difference from placebo for the individual carisbamate dose groups was also considered nonsignificant, based on a prespecified step-down analysis. Dizziness was the most common treatment-emergent adverse event, with a higher incidence (≥ 5% difference) in the combined carisbamate group (31%) than placebo (9%); the incidence was higher with carisbamate 1,200 mg (32%, n = 58) than with carisbamate 800 mg (30%, n = 53).

SIGNIFICANCE

Adjunctive carisbamate therapy in patients with POS did not demonstrate efficacy across the dose range assessed versus placebo. No new safety findings were observed.

摘要

目的

评估卡马西平附加治疗在部分发作性癫痫(POS)患者中每日 800mg 和 1200mg 的疗效、安全性和耐受性。

方法

纳入年龄≥16 岁、POS 诊断≥1 年且一种至三种抗癫痫药物治疗未控制的患者。符合条件的患者在 8 周的预处理基线期内继续服用稳定剂量的处方抗癫痫药物,然后随机(1:1:1)接受卡马西平(800mg/天或 1200mg/天)或安慰剂治疗 14 周的双盲期。主要疗效终点是双盲期与基线期相比,POS 频率的降低百分比和应答率(POS 频率降低≥50%的患者)。

主要发现

547 名患者被随机分组;540 名患者构成意向治疗(ITT)分析。434 名患者(79%)完成了研究。POS 频率从基线到治疗阶段的中位数降低百分比为:21%(安慰剂);30%(卡马西平 800mg);36%(卡马西平 1200mg)和 32%(联合卡马西平剂量)。联合卡马西平剂量组与安慰剂相比,POS 频率降低的中位数百分比(p=0.20)或应答率(p=0.18)无显著差异。因此,基于预设的逐步分析,认为个体卡马西平剂量组与安慰剂相比的差异也无统计学意义。头晕是最常见的治疗后不良事件,联合卡马西平组(31%)的发生率(≥5%差异)高于安慰剂组(9%);卡马西平 1200mg 组(32%,n=58)的发生率高于卡马西平 800mg 组(30%,n=53)。

意义

在评估的剂量范围内,POS 患者的附加卡马西平治疗与安慰剂相比没有显示出疗效。未观察到新的安全性发现。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验