Department of Gynecologic Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1155 Herman Pressler Drive, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Gynecol Oncol. 2011 Mar;120(3):321-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.12.352.
The utility of parametrial resection in women with early stage cervical cancer is controversial. In patients with favorable pathologic characteristics such as tumor size <2cm and the absence of lymphovascular space invasion, the rate of parametrial involvement is very low. More conservative surgical approaches have therefore been suggested. The objective of this report is to review the existing literature in this area and to describe an ongoing prospective study evaluating the safety and efficacy of conservative surgery in women with early stage cervical cancer.
We performed a search of PubMed for English language articles published between 1970 and 2010 using the MeSH terms "cervical cancer", "conservative surgery", and "cone biopsy".
Several retrospective studies have shown that <1% of patients with early stage cervical cancer with favorable pathologic characteristics have parametrial involvement. In addition, approximately 60% of patients undergoing radical trachelectomy have no residual disease in the final pathologic specimen. Recent studies have reported on the feasibility and safety of performing less radical surgery consisting of pelvic lymphadenectomy with cone biopsy, simple trachelectomy or simple hysterectomy in women with stage IA1 to IB1 cervical carcinoma. In addition, a prospective, multi-center, international trial is currently being performed to evaluate the outcomes of performing pelvic lymphadenectomy with conservative surgery (simple hysterectomy or cervical conization) in patients with favorable pathologic characteristics. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by conservative surgery is also being explored as an option for patients with larger tumors and other pathologic characteristics that do not meet the criteria to perform conservative surgery alone.
The rate of parametrial involvement in women with early stage cervical cancer with favorable pathologic characteristics is low. Should the results of ongoing studies be favorable, conservative surgery could become the standard of care for certain women with early stage cervical cancer.
子宫旁切除术在早期宫颈癌患者中的应用存在争议。对于肿瘤直径<2cm 和无脉管间隙浸润等有利病理特征的患者,宫旁侵犯的发生率非常低。因此,有学者建议采用更保守的手术方式。本研究旨在回顾该领域的现有文献,并描述一项正在进行的前瞻性研究,评估早期宫颈癌患者采用保守性手术的安全性和有效性。
我们使用“宫颈癌”、“保守性手术”和“锥形活检”的 MeSH 术语,在 PubMed 上检索了 1970 年至 2010 年期间发表的英文文献。
几项回顾性研究表明,在肿瘤直径<2cm 和无脉管间隙浸润等有利病理特征的早期宫颈癌患者中,<1%的患者发生宫旁侵犯。此外,约 60%行根治性子宫颈切除术的患者最终病理标本中无残留病灶。最近的研究报道了在具有 IA1 至 IB1 期宫颈癌的女性中,行较少侵袭性手术(包括盆腔淋巴结切除术联合锥形活检、单纯子宫颈切除术或单纯子宫切除术)的可行性和安全性。此外,目前正在进行一项前瞻性、多中心、国际临床试验,以评估对具有有利病理特征的患者行盆腔淋巴结切除术联合保守性手术(单纯子宫切除术或宫颈锥形切除术)的结局。新辅助化疗联合保守性手术也正在探索用于治疗肿瘤较大或其他不符合单独行保守性手术标准的患者。
具有有利病理特征的早期宫颈癌患者发生宫旁侵犯的比例较低。如果正在进行的研究结果是有利的,那么保守性手术可能成为某些早期宫颈癌患者的标准治疗方法。