• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Statement of the Uterus Commission of the Gynecological Oncology Working Group (AGO) on Surgical Therapy for Patients with Stage IA2-IIB1 Cervical Cancer.妇科肿瘤学工作组(AGO)子宫委员会关于IA2-IIB1期宫颈癌患者手术治疗的声明。
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2023 Oct 5;83(10):1199-1204. doi: 10.1055/a-2160-3279. eCollection 2023 Oct.
2
Updated Opinion of the Uterus Commission of the Gynecological Oncology Working Group (AGO) and the Gynecological Endoscopy Working Group (AGE) of the German Society of Gynecology and Obstetrics (DGGG) on the Randomized Study Comparing Minimally Invasive with Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Early-stage Cervical Cancer (LACC).德国妇产科学会(DGGG)妇科肿瘤学工作组(AGO)和妇科内镜工作组(AGE)子宫委员会关于比较早期宫颈癌微创根治性子宫切除术与腹式根治性子宫切除术的随机研究的最新意见(LACC)
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2019 Feb;79(2):145-147. doi: 10.1055/a-0824-7929. Epub 2019 Feb 18.
3
Statement of the Uterus Commission of the Gynecological Oncology Working Group (AGO) on Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Prior to Definitive Radiochemotherapy in Patients with Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer.妇科肿瘤学工作组(AGO)子宫委员会关于局部晚期宫颈癌患者在确定性放化疗前新辅助化疗的声明。
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2024 Apr 15;84(6):523-528. doi: 10.1055/a-2279-3163. eCollection 2024 Jun.
4
Class I hysterectomy in stage Ia2-Ib1 cervical cancer.Ia2-Ib1期宫颈癌的Ⅰ类子宫切除术。
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2018 Dec;13(4):494-500. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2018.76832. Epub 2018 Jun 29.
5
Comparison of laparoscopic and open radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients with tumor size ≤2 cm.比较肿瘤大小≤2cm 的宫颈癌患者行腹腔镜与开腹广泛子宫切除术的疗效。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2020 May;30(5):564-571. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-000994. Epub 2020 Apr 9.
6
Postoperative nomogram for the prediction of disease-free survival in lymph node-negative stage I-IIA cervical cancer patients treated with radical hysterectomy.淋巴结阴性Ⅰ期-ⅡA 期宫颈癌根治性子宫切除术后无病生存预测的术后列线图。
J Obstet Gynaecol. 2020 Jul;40(5):699-704. doi: 10.1080/01443615.2019.1652888. Epub 2019 Oct 12.
7
Quality of life in patients with cervical cancer after open versus minimally invasive radical hysterectomy (LACC): a secondary outcome of a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3, non-inferiority trial.接受开腹与微创根治性子宫切除术(LACC)的宫颈癌患者的生活质量:一项多中心、随机、开放标签、3 期、非劣效性试验的次要结局。
Lancet Oncol. 2020 Jun;21(6):851-860. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30081-4.
8
Less radical surgery for early-stage cervical cancer: a systematic review.早期宫颈癌的非根治性手术:系统评价。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Apr;224(4):348-358.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.11.041. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
9
Outcomes of Minimally Invasive versus Open Radical Hysterectomy for Early Stage Cervical Cancer Incorporating 2018 FIGO Staging.2018 年 FIGO 分期中微创与开腹根治性子宫切除术治疗早期宫颈癌的结局比较。
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2021 Apr;28(4):824-828. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2020.07.021. Epub 2020 Jul 28.
10
International radical trachelectomy assessment: IRTA study.国际广泛子宫颈切除术评估:IRTA 研究。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2019 Mar;29(3):635-638. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2019-000273. Epub 2019 Feb 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Investigating the impact of persistent HPV infection on recurrence of lesions post-surgery for early-stage cervical cancer and related influencing factors.探讨持续性人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)感染对早期宫颈癌术后病灶复发的影响及相关影响因素。
Front Oncol. 2025 Feb 4;15:1506521. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1506521. eCollection 2025.
2
Clinical analysis of 314 patients with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion who underwent total hysterectomy directly: a multi-center, retrospective cohort study.314 例高级别鳞状上皮内病变患者行全子宫切除术的临床分析:一项多中心、回顾性队列研究。
BMC Cancer. 2024 May 9;24(1):575. doi: 10.1186/s12885-024-12342-2.

本文引用的文献

1
SUCCOR cone study: conization before radical hysterectomy.SUCCOR 锥形研究:根治性子宫切除术前行锥形切除术。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2022 Feb;32(2):117-124. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2021-002544. Epub 2022 Jan 17.
2
Cervical conization before primary radical hysterectomy has a protective effect on disease recurrence in early cervical cancer: A two-center matched cohort study according to surgical approach.原发性根治性子宫切除术前行宫颈锥切术对早期宫颈癌疾病复发具有保护作用:一项根据手术方式进行的两中心配对队列研究。
Gynecol Oncol. 2022 Mar;164(3):535-542. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.12.023. Epub 2021 Dec 27.
3
ConCerv: a prospective trial of conservative surgery for low-risk early-stage cervical cancer.ConCerv:低危早期宫颈癌保守性手术的前瞻性研究。
Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2021 Oct;31(10):1317-1325. doi: 10.1136/ijgc-2021-002921. Epub 2021 Sep 7.
4
Association of preoperative cone biopsy with recurrences after radical hysterectomy.术前锥形活检与根治性子宫切除术后复发的关系。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2022 Jan;305(1):215-222. doi: 10.1007/s00404-021-06145-0. Epub 2021 Jul 21.
5
Less radical surgery for early-stage cervical cancer: a systematic review.早期宫颈癌的非根治性手术:系统评价。
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021 Apr;224(4):348-358.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2020.11.041. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
6
Predictors of recurrence following laparoscopic radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: A multi-institutional study.早期宫颈癌腹腔镜根治性子宫切除术后复发的预测因素:一项多机构研究。
Gynecol Oncol. 2020 Oct;159(1):164-170. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.06.508. Epub 2020 Jul 12.
7
Recurrence Rates in Patients With Cervical Cancer Treated With Abdominal Versus Minimally Invasive Radical Hysterectomy: A Multi-Institutional Retrospective Review Study.接受腹式与微创根治性子宫切除术治疗的宫颈癌患者的复发率:一项多机构回顾性研究。
J Clin Oncol. 2020 Apr 1;38(10):1030-1040. doi: 10.1200/JCO.19.03012. Epub 2020 Feb 7.
8
Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer.微创与经腹根治性子宫切除术治疗宫颈癌的比较。
N Engl J Med. 2018 Nov 15;379(20):1895-1904. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1806395. Epub 2018 Oct 31.
9
Sensitivity and negative predictive value for sentinel lymph node biopsy in women with early-stage cervical cancer.早期宫颈癌女性前哨淋巴结活检的敏感性和阴性预测值。
Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Apr;145(1):96-101. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.02.005. Epub 2017 Feb 8.
10
Conservative management of early stage cervical cancer: is there a role for less radical surgery?早期宫颈癌的保守治疗:是否有必要采用较少激进的手术?
Gynecol Oncol. 2011 Mar;120(3):321-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2010.12.352.

妇科肿瘤学工作组(AGO)子宫委员会关于IA2-IIB1期宫颈癌患者手术治疗的声明。

Statement of the Uterus Commission of the Gynecological Oncology Working Group (AGO) on Surgical Therapy for Patients with Stage IA2-IIB1 Cervical Cancer.

作者信息

Fehm Tanja, Beckmann Matthias W, Mahner Sven, Denschlag Dominik, Brucker Sara, Hillemanns Peter, Tempfer Clemens

机构信息

Universitätsfrauenklinik der Universität Düsseldorf, CIO ABCD, Düsseldorf, Germany.

Frauenklinik, Comprehensive Cancer Center ER-EMN, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.

出版信息

Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2023 Oct 5;83(10):1199-1204. doi: 10.1055/a-2160-3279. eCollection 2023 Oct.

DOI:10.1055/a-2160-3279
PMID:37808259
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10556864/
Abstract

The presentation of the results of the prospective randomized international multicenter study AGO-OP.8 - CCTG CX.5 - SHAPE at the annual conference of the American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in 2023 will affect the surgical treatment of early-stage cervical cancer. In the SHAPE study, simple total hysterectomy (experimental arm) was found to be non-inferior to radical hysterectomy (standard arm) to treat patients with early-stage cervical cancer (FIGO stages [2018] IA2 - IB1 ≤ 2 cm with an infiltration depth of < 1 cm); after 3 years' follow-up the pelvic recurrence rate was 2.52% (experimental arm) compared to 2.17% (standard arm) with no statistically significant difference with regards to recurrence-free survival and overall survival rates. After weighing up the results of the SHAPE study published at the conference, the Uterus Organ Commission of AGO is of the opinion that, in addition to the use of radical hysterectomy to treat patients with invasive cervical cancer which is FIGO stage IA2 - IB1 ≤ 2 cm with an infiltration depth of < 1 cm, simple total hysterectomy may also be considered for primary surgical therapy on a case-by-case basis after suitable explanation of the associated risks. It will be necessary to wait for the data of the full publication before discussing whether this approach should be included in official guidelines and defining it as a new therapy standard.

摘要

前瞻性随机国际多中心研究AGO-OP.8 - CCTG CX.5 - SHAPE的结果在2023年美国临床肿瘤学会(ASCO)年会上的展示将影响早期宫颈癌的外科治疗。在SHAPE研究中,发现单纯全子宫切除术(试验组)在治疗早期宫颈癌患者(国际妇产科联盟[2018年]IA2 - IB1期,≤2 cm,浸润深度<1 cm)方面不劣于根治性子宫切除术(标准组);经过3年随访,试验组盆腔复发率为2.52%,标准组为2.17%,无病生存率和总生存率方面无统计学显著差异。在权衡会议上公布的SHAPE研究结果后,AGO子宫器官委员会认为,除了使用根治性子宫切除术治疗国际妇产科联盟IA2 - IB1期、≤2 cm、浸润深度<1 cm的浸润性宫颈癌患者外,在对相关风险进行适当解释后,也可逐案考虑将单纯全子宫切除术作为主要手术治疗方法。在讨论这种方法是否应纳入官方指南并将其定义为新的治疗标准之前,有必要等待完整发表的数据。