• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

它会叫,但会咬人吗?虽然美国卫生与公众服务部(HHS)可以审查拟议的保险费上涨情况,但它没有实际阻止这些上涨的权力。

It barks, but will it bite? While HHS can review proposed insurance premium increases, it lacks the authority to actually stop them.

作者信息

Vesely Rebecca

出版信息

Mod Healthc. 2011 Jan 3;41(1):6-7, 14, 1.

PMID:21322334
Abstract

HHS has new authority to review proposed insurance premium increases, but no real power to stop them. But at least some states without a rate review process say they welcome any support. "We are borderline at market failure," says Michael McRaith, left, director of the Illinois Department of Insurance. "The expectation is not that rates are going to dramatically or miraculously decline. But that rates will be more stable".

摘要

美国卫生与公众服务部(HHS)拥有审查拟议保险费上调的新权力,但却没有实际权力阻止这些上调。不过,至少一些没有费率审查程序的州表示,它们欢迎任何支持。伊利诺伊州保险部主任迈克尔·麦克雷思(Michael McRaith)表示:“我们正处于市场失灵的边缘。预期并非费率会大幅或奇迹般地下调,而是费率将更加稳定。”

相似文献

1
It barks, but will it bite? While HHS can review proposed insurance premium increases, it lacks the authority to actually stop them.它会叫,但会咬人吗?虽然美国卫生与公众服务部(HHS)可以审查拟议的保险费上涨情况,但它没有实际阻止这些上涨的权力。
Mod Healthc. 2011 Jan 3;41(1):6-7, 14, 1.
2
Truth and consequences--insurance-premium rate regulation and the ACA.真相与后果——保险费率监管与《平价医疗法案》
N Engl J Med. 2010 Sep 2;363(10):899-901. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1006344. Epub 2010 Jul 21.
3
Amping up oversight. HHS announces state grants for health plan rate review as insurers seek delay.
Mod Healthc. 2011 Feb 28;41(9):10.
4
Knowledge meetup. HHS offers guidance for insurance exchanges.
Mod Healthc. 2010;40(51):10.
5
Missing benefits? Rule on medical loss ratios has some worried.福利缺失?医疗损失率规定让一些人忧心忡忡。
Mod Healthc. 2010 Nov 29;40(48):8-9.
6
States with stronger health insurance rate review authority experienced lower premiums in the individual market in 2010-13.在 2010-13 年期间,具有更强健康保险费率审查权的州,其个人市场的保费更低。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2015 Aug;34(8):1358-67. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2014.1463.
7
States balk at premium hikes; health plans may face a squeeze.各州对保费上涨犹豫不决;健康保险计划可能面临压力。
Manag Care. 2010 May;19(5):5-6, 9.
8
Rate increase disclosure and review. Final rule with comment period.利率上调披露与审查。有意见征求期的最终规则。
Fed Regist. 2011 May 23;76(99):29964-88.
9
HHS challenged over demand billing change.美国卫生与公众服务部因需求计费变更面临挑战。
Contemp Longterm Care. 1989 Nov;12(13):22-3.
10
Consumer savings. HHS report: ACA provisions saved $2.1 billion.消费者储蓄。美国卫生与公众服务部报告:《平价医疗法案》条款节省了21亿美元。
Mod Healthc. 2012 Sep 17;42(38):8-9.