Gallieni Maurizio, Saxena Ramesh, Davidson Ingemar
Nephrology and Dialysis Unit, S. Paolo Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Semin Intervent Radiol. 2009 Jun;26(2):96-105. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1222452.
Large differences in dialysis access exist between Europe, Canada, and the United States, even after adjustment for patient characteristics. Vascular access care is characterized by similar issues, but with a different magnitude. Obesity, type 2 diabetes, and peripheral vascular disease, independent predictors of central venous catheter use, are growing problems globally, which could lead to more difficulties in native arteriovenous fistula placement and survival. Creation of dedicated dialysis access teams, including a vascular access coordinator, is a fundamental step in improving vascular access care; however, it might not be sufficient. The possibility that factors other than patient characteristics and surgical skills are important in determining outcomes is likely; it might explain apparent contradictions of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) practices (kidney transplant, peritoneal dialysis, patterns of vascular access use in hemodialysis), where some countries excel in one area and score poorly in another. We are on the same path, but we have a long way to go.
即便在对患者特征进行调整之后,欧洲、加拿大和美国在透析通路方面仍存在巨大差异。血管通路护理存在类似问题,但程度有所不同。肥胖、2型糖尿病和外周血管疾病是中心静脉导管使用的独立预测因素,在全球范围内这些问题日益严重,这可能导致自体动静脉内瘘的建立和存活面临更多困难。组建包括血管通路协调员在内的专门透析通路团队是改善血管通路护理的基本步骤;然而,这可能并不够。除患者特征和手术技能之外的其他因素在决定治疗结果方面很重要,这种可能性很大;这或许可以解释终末期肾病(ESRD)治疗实践(肾移植、腹膜透析、血液透析中血管通路的使用模式)中明显的矛盾之处,即一些国家在某一领域表现出色而在另一领域得分较低。我们走在同一条道路上,但仍有很长的路要走。