New York University, Steinhardt School of Culture, Education, & Human Development, 35 West 4th Street, Suite 1200, New York, NY 10003, USA.
J Sch Health. 2011 Mar;81(3):123-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2010.00570.x.
Concerns about a coordinated accreditation system for professional preparation programs in school health education were raised by Clark in a commentary published in the October 2009 issue of the Journal of School Health. The purpose of this article is to clarify information presented by Clark as well as offer alternative views to some of his opinions.
To provide context, an overview is provided about efforts to strengthen quality assurance systems for school and community health education. Additional topics address the Dallas II conference, generic competencies, unification of the profession, National Council on Accreditation of Teacher Education/Teacher Education Accreditation Council, competency-based vs settings approach, and CUP implications.
In the discussion, the authors address several key points raised by Clark and note areas of agreement, alternative views, and clarification of facts.
The conclusion summarizes the benefits of accreditation for school health education and the health education profession.
在 2009 年 10 月的《学校健康杂志》上，克拉克发表了一篇评论，对学校健康教育专业准备计划的协调认证系统表示担忧。本文的目的是澄清克拉克所提出的信息，并对他的一些观点提出替代意见。
为了提供背景，概述了加强学校和社区健康教育质量保证体系的努力。其他主题包括达拉斯 II 会议、通用能力、专业统一、国家认证委员会/教师教育认证委员会、基于能力的方法与环境方法以及 CUP 的影响。
在讨论中，作者讨论了克拉克提出的几个关键点，并指出了一些共识、替代观点和事实澄清的领域。
结论总结了学校健康教育和健康教育专业认证的好处。
