Suppr超能文献

一项比较粒细胞集落刺激因子给药部位以动员血液恶性肿瘤患者自体造血干细胞移植患者外周血干细胞的随机临床试验。

A randomized clinical trial comparing granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor administration sites for mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells for patients with hematologic malignancies undergoing autologous stem cell transplantation.

机构信息

Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.

出版信息

Transfusion. 2011 Aug;51(8):1779-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2010.03052.x. Epub 2011 Feb 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

A study was undertaken to investigate whether granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) injection in lower adipose tissue-containing sites (arms and legs) would result in a lower exposure and reduced stem cell collection efficiency compared with injection into abdominal skin.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

We completed a prospective randomized study to determine the efficacy and tolerability of different injection sites for patients with multiple myeloma or lymphoma undergoing stem cell mobilization and apheresis. Primary endpoints were the number of CD34+ cells collected and the number of days of apheresis. Forty patients were randomly assigned to receive cytokine injections in their abdomen (Group A) or extremities (Group B). Randomization was stratified based on diagnosis (myeloma, n=29 vs. lymphoma, n=11), age, and mobilization strategy and balanced across demographic factors and body mass index.

RESULTS

Thirty-five subjects were evaluable for the primary endpoint: 18 in Group A and 17 in Group B. One evaluable subject in each group failed to collect a minimum dose of at least 2.0×10(6) CD34+ cells/kg. The mean numbers of CD34+ cells (±SD) collected were not different between Groups A and B (9.15×10(6)±4.7×10(6) /kg vs. 9.85×10(6) ±5×10(6) /kg, respectively; p=NS) after a median of 2 days of apheresis. Adverse events were not different between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

The site of G-CSF administration does not affect the number of CD34+ cells collected by apheresis or the duration of apheresis needed to reach the target cell dose.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在探讨粒细胞集落刺激因子(G-CSF)注射于含脂肪组织较低的部位(手臂和腿部)与注射于腹部皮肤相比,是否会导致更低的暴露度和降低干细胞采集效率。

研究设计和方法

我们完成了一项前瞻性随机研究,以确定多发性骨髓瘤或淋巴瘤患者进行干细胞动员和单采时不同注射部位的疗效和耐受性。主要终点是采集的 CD34+细胞数量和单采天数。40 名患者被随机分配到腹部(A 组)或四肢(B 组)接受细胞因子注射。随机分组基于诊断(骨髓瘤,n=29 与淋巴瘤,n=11)、年龄和动员策略,并根据人口统计学因素和体重指数进行平衡。

结果

35 名受试者可评估主要终点:A 组 18 名,B 组 17 名。每组各有 1 名可评估的受试者未能采集到至少 2.0×106 CD34+细胞/kg 的最低剂量。接受 G-CSF 治疗后,两组之间采集的 CD34+细胞数量(±SD)无显著差异(分别为 9.15×106±4.7×106/kg 和 9.85×106±5×106/kg;p=NS),采集天数中位数为 2 天。两组之间的不良反应无显著差异。

结论

G-CSF 给药部位不会影响单采采集的 CD34+细胞数量或达到目标细胞剂量所需的单采时间。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1fca/4878908/ca1697ade80e/nihms785887f1.jpg

相似文献

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验