• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

脐部腹腔镜单部位手术与腹股沟精索静脉结扎术治疗双侧精索静脉曲张的对比研究。

Umbilical laparoendoscopic single site surgery versus inguinal varicocelectomy for bilateral varicocele: a comparative study.

机构信息

Medical Research Institute of Pusan National University, Busan, Korea.

出版信息

Int J Urol. 2011 Mar;18(3):250-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2010.02701.x. Epub 2011 Jan 10.

DOI:10.1111/j.1442-2042.2010.02701.x
PMID:21332819
Abstract

We aimed to determine the efficacy of umbilical laparoendoscopic single site surgery (LESS) bilateral varicocelectomy on the basis of a comparative study versus open inguinal bilateral varicocelectomy. We enrolled 39 patients who underwent bilateral varicocelectomy with predetermined surgical indications at two hospitals with either the LESS (n = 19) or the open inguinal approach (n = 20). Operative time, operation-related pain (10-point visual analog pain scale), catch-up growth of the testes, semen parameters, and complications after surgery between the LESS group and the open group at 3 months after surgery were compared. Operative times were 46.8 and 72.8 min (P < 0.001) in the LESS and open surgery groups, respectively. Patients in the LESS group reported lower surgery-related pain than those in the open surgery group at 3 months (2.5 vs 1.2, P = 0.029). A significant improvement in terms of semen concentration, motility, catch-up growth of the bilateral testes was observed in both groups, although no significant differences were detected between the groups. Postoperative complications were also similar between the two groups. LESS varicocelectomy required a shorter operative time than inguinal varicocelectomy for bilateral cases. In addition, the LESS procedure showed less postoperative pain and cosmetic benefits with similar seminal outcomes. Thus, LESS for patients undergoing bilateral varicocelectomy represents a promising surgical approach.

摘要

我们旨在通过与开放腹股沟双侧精索静脉曲张切除术的对比研究,确定脐腹腔镜单部位手术(LESS)双侧精索静脉曲张的疗效。我们招募了 39 名在两家医院因预定手术指征而接受双侧精索静脉曲张切除术的患者,其中 LESS 组(n=19)和开放腹股沟组(n=20)各 19 名。比较 LESS 组和开放组术后 3 个月的手术时间、与手术相关的疼痛(10 分视觉模拟疼痛量表)、睾丸追赶生长、精液参数和术后并发症。LESS 组和开放组的手术时间分别为 46.8 和 72.8 分钟(P<0.001)。LESS 组患者术后 3 个月与手术相关的疼痛明显低于开放手术组(2.5 对 1.2,P=0.029)。两组的精液浓度、活力和双侧睾丸追赶生长均有显著改善,但组间无显著差异。两组术后并发症也相似。LESS 精索静脉曲张切除术双侧病例的手术时间比腹股沟精索静脉曲张切除术短。此外,LESS 手术具有术后疼痛较轻、美容效果较好的优点,精液结果相似。因此,LESS 治疗双侧精索静脉曲张患者是一种有前途的手术方法。

相似文献

1
Umbilical laparoendoscopic single site surgery versus inguinal varicocelectomy for bilateral varicocele: a comparative study.脐部腹腔镜单部位手术与腹股沟精索静脉结扎术治疗双侧精索静脉曲张的对比研究。
Int J Urol. 2011 Mar;18(3):250-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2010.02701.x. Epub 2011 Jan 10.
2
Editorial comment to Umbilical laparoendoscopic single site surgery versus inguinal varicocelectomy for bilateral varicocele: a comparative study.脐部单孔腹腔镜手术与腹股沟精索静脉高位结扎术治疗双侧精索静脉曲张的比较研究:编者按
Int J Urol. 2011 Mar;18(3):254-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1442-2042.2011.02724.x.
3
Is adolescent varicocelectomy safe after previous inguinal surgery?青少年精索静脉曲张手术后再次行腹股沟手术是否安全?
J Urol. 2010 Oct;184(4 Suppl):1716-21. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.03.123. Epub 2010 Aug 21.
4
Varicocelectomy for male infertility: a comparative study of open, laparoscopic and microsurgical approaches.精索静脉曲张切除术治疗男性不育症:开放手术、腹腔镜手术及显微外科手术方法的比较研究
J Urol. 2008 Jul;180(1):266-70. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.03.050. Epub 2008 May 21.
5
Microsurgical inguinal varicocelectomy with and without testicular delivery.有和没有睾丸提出的显微外科腹股沟精索静脉曲张切除术。
Urology. 2006 Dec;68(6):1323-6. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2006.08.1113.
6
Comparison of outcomes of different varicocelectomy techniques: open inguinal, laparoscopic, and subinguinal microscopic varicocelectomy: a randomized clinical trial.不同精索静脉曲张切除术技术的疗效比较:开放腹股沟、腹腔镜及腹股沟下显微镜下精索静脉曲张切除术:一项随机临床试验
Urology. 2007 Mar;69(3):417-20. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.01.057.
7
Comparison of open and laparoscopic varicocelectomies in terms of operative time, sperm parameters, and complications.开放手术与腹腔镜精索静脉结扎术在手术时间、精子参数及并发症方面的比较。
Urol J. 2009 Summer;6(3):170-5.
8
Comparing three different surgical techniques used in adult bilateral varicocele.比较用于成人双侧精索静脉曲张的三种不同手术技术。
Asian J Endosc Surg. 2012 Feb;5(1):12-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1758-5910.2011.00109.x. Epub 2011 Nov 2.
9
Testicular catch-up growth after varicocelectomy: does surgical technique make a difference?精索静脉曲张结扎术后睾丸的追赶生长:手术技术有影响吗?
Urology. 2009 Feb;73(2):289-92. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2008.07.039. Epub 2008 Sep 25.
10
Bilateral spermatic cord en bloc ligation by laparoendoscopic single-site surgery: preliminary experience compared to conventional laparoscopy.经腹腔镜单孔手术双侧精索静脉整块结扎术:与传统腹腔镜手术相比的初步经验
BMC Urol. 2014 Oct 23;14:83. doi: 10.1186/1471-2490-14-83.

引用本文的文献

1
Surgical or radiological treatment for varicoceles in subfertile men.对不育男性精索静脉曲张的手术或放射治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 23;4(4):CD000479. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000479.pub6.
2
Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery varicocelectomy versus conventional laparoscopic varicocele ligation: A meta-analysis.腹腔镜单孔手术精索静脉曲张切除术与传统腹腔镜精索静脉结扎术的Meta分析
J Int Med Res. 2016 Oct;44(5):985-993. doi: 10.1177/0300060516659824. Epub 2016 Sep 29.
3
Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery for benign urologic disease with a homemade single port device: design and tips for beginners.
使用自制单孔装置进行良性泌尿系统疾病的腹腔镜单孔手术:设计及给初学者的技巧
Korean J Urol. 2012 Mar;53(3):165-70. doi: 10.4111/kju.2012.53.3.165. Epub 2012 Mar 19.
4
Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery versus conventional laparoscopic varicocele ligation in men with palpable varicocele: a randomized, clinical study.腹腔镜单部位手术与传统腹腔镜精索静脉曲张结扎术治疗可触及精索静脉曲张男性患者的随机对照临床研究。
Surg Endosc. 2012 Apr;26(4):1056-62. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1997-2. Epub 2011 Nov 15.