Emergency Department, Saint-Antoine Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Pierre et Marie Curie-Paris 6 University, Paris, France.
Ann Emerg Med. 2011 Jun;57(6):582-9. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2011.01.001. Epub 2011 Feb 17.
The quality of endoscopy depends on the quality of upper gastrointestinal tract preparation. We determine whether in acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding the frequency of satisfactory stomach visualization was different after intravenous erythromycin, a nasogastric tube with gastric lavage, or both.
We performed a prospective, randomized, multicenter (6 emergency departments) study in patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding presenting with hematemesis or melena. The patients were randomized into 3 groups: (1) intravenous erythromycin infusion without nasogastric tube placement (erythromycin group), (2) nasogastric tube placement without erythromycin (nasogastric group), and (3) intravenous erythromycin infusion combined with nasogastric tube placement (nasogastric-erythromycin group). The main outcome measure was the proportion of satisfactory stomach visualization.
Two hundred fifty-three patients (181 men, mean age 61 years [SD 15 years], 84 with cirrhosis) were randomized: 84 (erythromycin group), 85 (nasogastric group), and 84 (nasogastric-erythromycin group). Overall, there was 85% satisfactory stomach visualization; between-group differences were not significant: -4% (95% confidence interval [CI] -15% to 6%) for the erythromycin group and nasogastric-erythromycin group, 2% (95% CI -14% to 9%) for the erythromycin group and nasogastric group, and -6.5% (95% CI -17% to 4%) for the nasogastric group and nasogastric-erythromycin group. The duration of the endoscopic procedure, rebleeding frequency, the need for a second endoscopy, the number of transfused blood units, and mortality at days 2, 7, and 30 did not differ significantly between groups.
In acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding, administration of intravenous erythromycin provides satisfactory endoscopic conditions, without the need for a nasogastric tube and gastric lavage.
上消化道内镜检查的质量取决于上消化道准备的质量。我们旨在确定在急性上消化道出血中,静脉内给予红霉素、放置鼻胃管进行洗胃或两者联合应用后,胃内可视度满意的频率是否存在差异。
我们进行了一项前瞻性、随机、多中心(6 个急诊室)研究,纳入了呕血或黑便的急性上消化道出血患者。患者被随机分为 3 组:(1)静脉内给予红霉素输注而不放置鼻胃管(红霉素组),(2)放置鼻胃管而不给红霉素(鼻胃管组),以及(3)静脉内给予红霉素输注联合放置鼻胃管(鼻胃管-红霉素组)。主要观察指标为胃可视度满意的比例。
253 例患者(181 例男性,平均年龄 61 岁[标准差 15 岁],84 例伴有肝硬化)被随机分组:84 例(红霉素组)、85 例(鼻胃管组)和 84 例(鼻胃管-红霉素组)。总体而言,胃可视度满意的比例为 85%;组间差异无统计学意义:红霉素组与鼻胃管-红霉素组之间相差-4%(95%置信区间[-15%,6%]),红霉素组与鼻胃管组之间相差 2%(95%置信区间[-14%,9%]),鼻胃管组与鼻胃管-红霉素组之间相差-6.5%(95%置信区间[-17%,4%])。内镜操作时间、再出血频率、需要再次内镜检查、输注的血单位数以及 2、7 和 30 天时的死亡率在组间无显著差异。
在急性上消化道出血中,静脉内给予红霉素可提供满意的内镜条件,无需放置鼻胃管和洗胃。