• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胃癌标本处理技术的描述性分析。

A descriptive analysis of gastric cancer specimen processing techniques.

机构信息

Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Surg Oncol. 2011 Mar 1;103(3):248-56. doi: 10.1002/jso.21827.

DOI:10.1002/jso.21827
PMID:21337553
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Adherence to guidelines for adequate gastric cancer specimen assessment is poor in North America. Inadequate staging and poor prognosis were noted in some series when these guidelines are not met. Recent advances have been made in standardizing cancer pathology reports in Canada; however, the uptake of these reporting systems is unknown for gastric cancer. A survey of pathologists in Ontario was performed to outline the processing techniques and practices for assessing gastric cancer specimens.

METHODS

A survey was designed through a collaboration of surgical oncologists, general surgeons, pathologists, and research staff. Pathologists were identified using the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario and MD Select databases. Participants were surveyed online or by mail-out.

RESULTS

The response rate was 40.2% (147/366). Vascular invasion, perineural invasion, and signet ring cells were all reported as being examined for by the majority of pathologists. Fat clearing solution and keratin immunohistochemical techniques were not reported as being consistently utilized. Less than 70% of pathologists indicated using a form of synoptic report.

CONCLUSION

Variations in practice and technique were observed. This may or may not reflect differences in quality of care or simply preferences for achieving equivalent results in the absence of standardized procedures. Education, evidence-based procedural guidelines and further research are required to provide infrastructure and support for pathologists and surgeons involved in the care of gastric cancer patients.

摘要

背景

在北美,胃癌标本评估指南的遵循情况不佳。在某些系列中,如果不遵守这些指南,就会出现分期不足和预后不良的情况。加拿大在癌症病理报告标准化方面取得了一些进展;然而,这些报告系统在胃癌中的采用情况尚不清楚。对安大略省的病理学家进行了一项调查,以概述评估胃癌标本的处理技术和实践。

方法

通过外科肿瘤学家、普通外科医生、病理学家和研究人员的合作设计了一项调查。使用安大略省医师和外科医生学院和 MD Select 数据库来确定参与者。参与者通过在线或邮寄方式进行调查。

结果

回复率为 40.2%(147/366)。大多数病理学家都报告检查了血管侵犯、神经周围侵犯和印戒细胞。脂肪清除溶液和角蛋白免疫组织化学技术并未被报告为一致使用。不到 70%的病理学家表示使用了一种综合报告形式。

结论

观察到实践和技术存在差异。这可能反映了护理质量的差异,也可能仅仅是在缺乏标准化程序的情况下对达到等效结果的偏好。需要教育、基于证据的程序指南和进一步的研究,为参与胃癌患者护理的病理学家和外科医生提供基础设施和支持。

相似文献

1
A descriptive analysis of gastric cancer specimen processing techniques.胃癌标本处理技术的描述性分析。
J Surg Oncol. 2011 Mar 1;103(3):248-56. doi: 10.1002/jso.21827.
2
Quality indicators for gastric cancer surgery: a survey of practicing pathologists in Ontario.胃癌手术质量指标:安大略省执业病理学家的一项调查
Ann Surg Oncol. 2009 Jul;16(7):1883-9. doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0468-7. Epub 2009 May 7.
3
Improving the quality of processing gastric cancer specimens: the pathologist's perspective.提高胃癌标本处理质量:病理学家的视角。
J Surg Oncol. 2010 Mar 1;101(3):195-9. doi: 10.1002/jso.21468.
4
Variance of surgeons versus pathologists in staging of colorectal cancer.结直肠癌分期中外科医生与病理学家之间的差异
Minerva Chir. 2006 Oct;61(5):385-91.
5
Handling and reporting of nephrectomy specimens for adult renal tumours: a survey by the European Network of Uropathology.成人肾肿瘤肾切除术标本的处理和报告:欧洲泌尿病理网络的调查。
J Clin Pathol. 2012 Feb;65(2):106-13. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2011-200339. Epub 2011 Sep 30.
6
Compliance with breast-conservation standards for patients with early-stage breast carcinoma.早期乳腺癌患者对保乳标准的依从性。
Cancer. 2003 Feb 15;97(4):893-904. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11141.
7
Inadequate documentation and resection for gastric cancer in the United States: a preliminary report.美国胃癌的记录与切除不充分:初步报告
Am Surg. 1998 Jul;64(7):680-5.
8
Current practice patterns among pathologists in the assessment of venous invasion in colorectal cancer.当前病理学家在评估结直肠癌静脉侵犯中的实践模式。
J Clin Pathol. 2011 Nov;64(11):983-9. doi: 10.1136/jclinpath-2011-200156. Epub 2011 Jun 22.
9
Barriers to optimal assessment of lymph nodes in colorectal cancer specimens.结直肠癌标本中淋巴结最佳评估的障碍。
Am J Clin Pathol. 2004 May;121(5):663-70. doi: 10.1309/17VK-M33B-FXF9-T8WD.
10
Management of gastric cancer in Ontario.安大略省胃癌的管理。
J Surg Oncol. 2010 Jul 1;102(1):54-63. doi: 10.1002/jso.21561.

引用本文的文献

1
Prognostic value of number of examined lymph nodes in patients with node-negative gastric cancer.淋巴结阴性胃癌患者中检查的淋巴结数量的预后价值
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Apr 7;20(13):3640-8. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i13.3640.