• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[Evaluation of an asthma control program in family health units].

作者信息

Carmo Tatiane Almeida do, Andrade Selma Maffei de, Cerci Neto Alcindo

机构信息

Diretoria de Ações em Saúde, Autarquia Municipal de Saúde, Londrina, Brasil.

出版信息

Cad Saude Publica. 2011 Jan;27(1):162-72. doi: 10.1590/s0102-311x2011000100017.

DOI:10.1590/s0102-311x2011000100017
PMID:21340115
Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the asthma control program in Londrina, Paraná State, Brazil. This is a cross-sectional study, comparing a family health unit (USF) with a consolidated program with two USFs without one. Interviews were performed with 313 asthma patients, 168 from the USF with a consolidated program and 145 from the USFs without one. In the studied sample, there were significant differences (p < 0.001) in the use of bronchodilators and in the number of emergency department visits between the USF with and without a consolidated program. Among the patients enrolled in the USF with a consolidated program, 55.4% reported the use of bronchodilator, in comparison with 74.5% of those enrolled in the two USF without a consolidated program. Respectively 29.2% and 55.9% of the patients from the USFs with and without a consolidated program needed emergency department care. A well-organized asthma control program may result in reduction of emergency department visits due to asthma exacerbation, thus contributing to improving health indicators and quality of life.

摘要

相似文献

1
[Evaluation of an asthma control program in family health units].
Cad Saude Publica. 2011 Jan;27(1):162-72. doi: 10.1590/s0102-311x2011000100017.
2
Evaluation of New York State's Child Health Plus: children who have asthma.纽约州儿童健康加护计划评估:患有哮喘的儿童。
Pediatrics. 2000 Mar;105(3 Suppl E):719-27.
3
Reduction in the number of asthma-related hospital admissions after the implementation of a multidisciplinary asthma control program in the city of Londrina, Brazil.在巴西隆德里纳市实施多学科哮喘控制项目后,与哮喘相关的住院人数减少。
J Bras Pneumol. 2008 Sep;34(9):639-45. doi: 10.1590/s1806-37132008000900002.
4
Effects of increased primary care access on process of care and health outcomes among patients with asthma who frequent emergency departments.增加基层医疗服务可及性对频繁就诊于急诊科的哮喘患者的医疗过程及健康结局的影响。
Am J Med. 2004 Oct 1;117(7):479-83. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.04.011.
5
Use of primary care services by elderly people with chronic conditions, Brazil.巴西慢性病老年人对初级保健服务的利用情况。
Rev Saude Publica. 2009 Aug;43(4):604-12. doi: 10.1590/s0034-89102009005000037. Epub 2009 Jun 19.
6
Assessment of primary health care from the perspective of patients hospitalized for ambulatory care sensitive conditions.从因非住院医疗敏感病症住院患者的角度评估初级卫生保健。
Fam Pract. 2016 Jun;33(3):243-8. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmv096. Epub 2015 Nov 30.
7
Association of an Asthma Improvement Collaborative With Health Care Utilization in Medicaid-Insured Pediatric Patients in an Urban Community.城市社区中医疗补助保险的儿科患者哮喘改善协作组织与医疗保健利用的关联
JAMA Pediatr. 2017 Nov 1;171(11):1072-1080. doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.2600.
8
Coordinated Asthma Program Improves Asthma Outcomes in High-Risk Children.协作哮喘项目改善高危儿童的哮喘治疗效果。
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2017 Sep;56(10):934-941. doi: 10.1177/0009922817705186. Epub 2017 Apr 24.
9
Family Health Program and ambulatory care-sensitive conditions in Southern Brazil.巴西南部的家庭健康计划与门诊护理敏感型疾病
Rev Saude Publica. 2008 Dec;42(6):1041-52. doi: 10.1590/s0034-89102008000600010.
10
Community asthma initiative: evaluation of a quality improvement program for comprehensive asthma care.社区哮喘计划:全面哮喘护理质量改进计划的评估。
Pediatrics. 2012 Mar;129(3):465-72. doi: 10.1542/peds.2010-3472. Epub 2012 Feb 20.

引用本文的文献

1
The economic impact of asthma on private healthcare system in Brazil: Economic impact of asthma in Brazil.巴西私人医疗体系中哮喘的经济负担:巴西哮喘的经济负担。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Mar 24;102(12):e33077. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000033077.
2
Time trend of Brazilian hospital admissions and deaths due to asthma among children and teenagers, 1998-2019.1998-2019 年巴西儿童和青少年因哮喘住院和死亡的时间趋势。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 15;16(3):e0248472. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248472. eCollection 2021.
3
Exposure to secondhand smoke among patients with asthma: a cross-sectional study.
哮喘患者二手烟暴露情况:一项横断面研究。
Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2020 Jan 27;18:eAO4781. doi: 10.31744/einstein_journal/2020AO4781. eCollection 2020.
4
Adding non-randomised studies to a Cochrane review brings complementary information for healthcare stakeholders: an augmented systematic review and meta-analysis.将非随机研究纳入Cochrane综述可为医疗保健利益相关者带来补充信息:增强的系统综述和荟萃分析。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Oct 21;16(1):598. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1816-5.
5
Chronic disease management programmes for adults with asthma.针对成年哮喘患者的慢性病管理项目。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 May 27;2015(5):CD007988. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007988.pub2.
6
Asthma and the socio-economic reality in Brazil.哮喘与巴西的社会经济现实。
World Allergy Organ J. 2013 Nov 12;6(1):20. doi: 10.1186/1939-4551-6-20.