• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

快速诊断和治疗结直肠癌计划对患者护理时间和肿瘤分期的影响。

Impact on patient care time and tumor stage of a program for fast diagnostic and treatment of colorectal cancer.

机构信息

Universidad Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona. Spain.

出版信息

Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2011 Jan;103(1):13-9. doi: 10.4321/s1130-01082011000100003.

DOI:10.4321/s1130-01082011000100003
PMID:21341932
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness of a fast track diagnosis and treatment program for colorectal cancer (CRC) in reducing the diagnosis to treatment interval (DTI) and tumor stage. To analyze the association between DTI and tumor stage.

METHODS

A quasi-experimental study with a control group was conducted, and 156 incident cases of CRC referred through a preferential pathway between July 2005 and December 2008 in a tertiary hospital were included, after excluding those treated urgently, treated by endoscopic polypectomy only or having periodic colonoscopies. A control group of 156 patients was randomly selected from all the patients referred through habitual pathways, frequency matched by tumor location, age and year of entry. Data was analyzed with multivariate linear and logistic regression.

RESULTS

Mean DTI was 39.20 days (95% CI: 36.21-42.42) for fast track patients and 63.40 days (95% CI: 57.08-70.41) for controls (p < 0.001), and this difference persisted after multivariate analysis. The odds of having a DTI longer than 30 days was 4.79 (95% CI: 2.19-10.51) higher for controls. There were no significant differences in tumor stage according to the pathway followed. Independently of the track followed, a DTI longer than 30 days was associated with advanced tumor stages for colon cancer, while it was associated with low stages for rectal cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

The PDTR strategy is effective in reducing DTI and may reduce patients' and relatives' anxiety. However, it is far from reaching the DTI recommended. The achieved reduction of the delay has no impact on tumor stage.

摘要

目的

评估快速诊断和治疗结直肠癌(CRC)方案在缩短诊断至治疗时间(DTI)和肿瘤分期方面的效果。分析 DTI 与肿瘤分期之间的关系。

方法

采用准实验性对照研究,纳入 2005 年 7 月至 2008 年 12 月期间通过一家三级医院优先途径就诊的 156 例 CRC 新发病例,排除紧急治疗、仅内镜下息肉切除术治疗或定期结肠镜检查的患者。从所有通过常规途径就诊的患者中随机选择了 156 例对照组患者,按照肿瘤位置、年龄和进入年份进行频数匹配。采用多元线性和逻辑回归进行数据分析。

结果

快速通道患者的平均 DTI 为 39.20 天(95%CI:36.21-42.42),对照组为 63.40 天(95%CI:57.08-70.41)(p<0.001),多变量分析后仍存在差异。对照组 DTI 超过 30 天的可能性比快速通道患者高 4.79 倍(95%CI:2.19-10.51)。肿瘤分期与就诊途径无关。独立于就诊途径,DTI 超过 30 天与结肠癌的晚期肿瘤分期相关,而与直肠癌的低分期相关。

结论

PDTR 策略可有效缩短 DTI,减轻患者和家属的焦虑。然而,远未达到推荐的 DTI。所实现的延迟缩短对肿瘤分期没有影响。

相似文献

1
Impact on patient care time and tumor stage of a program for fast diagnostic and treatment of colorectal cancer.快速诊断和治疗结直肠癌计划对患者护理时间和肿瘤分期的影响。
Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2011 Jan;103(1):13-9. doi: 10.4321/s1130-01082011000100003.
2
Should a colonoscopy be recommended for healthy individuals with increased carcinoembryonic antigen levels? A case-control study.对于癌胚抗原水平升高的健康人群,是否应推荐进行结肠镜检查?一项病例对照研究。
Dig Dis Sci. 2011 Aug;56(8):2396-403. doi: 10.1007/s10620-011-1606-1. Epub 2011 Feb 17.
3
The evaluation of diagnostic value of the tumor markers: CCSA-2 and CEA in colorectal cancer.肿瘤标志物CCSA-2和癌胚抗原在结直肠癌诊断价值中的评估。
Pol Przegl Chir. 2012 Feb;84(2):86-92. doi: 10.2478/v10035-012-0014-3.
4
[Endoscopic polypectomy in benign adenoma and in early colo-rectal lesions].[内镜下切除良性腺瘤及早期结直肠病变]
G Chir. 1999 Oct;20(10):436-9.
5
Colonoscopy in symptomatic patients with positive family history of colorectal cancer.对有结直肠癌家族史的有症状患者进行结肠镜检查。
Anticancer Res. 2000 May-Jun;20(3B):1991-4.
6
Safety of cold polypectomy for small colorectal neoplastic lesions: a prospective cohort study in Japan.小的结直肠肿瘤性病变冷圈套息肉切除术的安全性:日本的一项前瞻性队列研究
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017 Sep;32(9):1261-1266. doi: 10.1007/s00384-017-2856-y. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
7
Accuracy of the Narrow-Band Imaging International Colorectal Endoscopic Classification System in Identification of Deep Invasion in Colorectal Polyps.窄带成像国际结直肠内镜分类系统对结直肠息肉浸润深度的识别准确性。
Gastroenterology. 2019 Jan;156(1):75-87. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.10.004. Epub 2018 Oct 6.
8
Early Colonoscopy Improves the Outcome of Patients With Symptomatic Colorectal Cancer.早期结肠镜检查可改善有症状的结直肠癌患者的预后。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2017 Aug;60(8):837-844. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000863.
9
[Analysis of 643 colorectal cancer patients diagnosed by total colonoscopy].[经全结肠镜检查确诊的643例结直肠癌患者分析]
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2008 Feb;30(2):151-3.
10
Factors related to colorectal cancer in advanced adenomas and serrated polyps: a further step toward individualized surveillance.进展期腺瘤和锯齿状息肉中与结直肠癌相关的因素:迈向个体化监测的进一步进展
Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Nov;30(11):1337-1343. doi: 10.1097/MEG.0000000000001227.

引用本文的文献

1
Introduction of a systematic examination framework for chronic cough: a before-after cohort study in a clinical setting.慢性咳嗽系统检查框架的引入:一项临床环境中的前后队列研究。
Eur Clin Respir J. 2023 Oct 31;10(1):2273026. doi: 10.1080/20018525.2023.2273026. eCollection 2023.
2
The effect of time before diagnosis and treatment on colorectal cancer outcomes: systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis.诊断和治疗前时间对结直肠癌结局的影响:系统评价和剂量反应荟萃分析。
Br J Cancer. 2023 Oct;129(6):993-1006. doi: 10.1038/s41416-023-02377-w. Epub 2023 Aug 1.
3
Conflicting Guidelines: A Systematic Review on the Proper Interval for Colorectal Cancer Treatment.
相互冲突的指南:关于结直肠癌治疗适当间隔的系统评价
World J Surg. 2021 Jul;45(7):2235-2250. doi: 10.1007/s00268-021-06075-7. Epub 2021 Apr 3.
4
Cancer diagnostic tools to aid decision-making in primary care: mixed-methods systematic reviews and cost-effectiveness analysis.癌症诊断工具辅助初级保健决策:混合方法系统评价和成本效益分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Nov;24(66):1-332. doi: 10.3310/hta24660.
5
Factors Contributing to Delay in Specialist Care After Colorectal Cancer Diagnosis in Kentucky.肯塔基州结直肠癌诊断后专科治疗延误的相关因素。
J Surg Res. 2021 Mar;259:420-430. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2020.09.012. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
6
Delays in referral from primary care worsen survival for patients with colorectal cancer: a retrospective cohort study.初级保健转诊延误使结直肠癌患者的生存恶化:一项回顾性队列研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2020 Jun 25;70(696):e463-e471. doi: 10.3399/bjgp20X710441. Print 2020 Jul.
7
Prognostic consequences of implementing cancer patient pathways in Denmark: a comparative cohort study of symptomatic cancer patients in primary care.丹麦实施癌症患者路径的预后后果:初级保健中症状性癌症患者的对比队列研究。
BMC Cancer. 2017 Sep 6;17(1):627. doi: 10.1186/s12885-017-3623-8.
8
Factors that influence treatment delay in patients with colorectal cancer.影响结直肠癌患者治疗延迟的因素。
Oncotarget. 2017 May 30;8(22):36728-36742. doi: 10.18632/oncotarget.13574.
9
Tumour stage and implementation of standardised cancer patient pathways: a comparative cohort study.肿瘤分期与标准化癌症患者诊疗路径的实施:一项队列对比研究。
Br J Gen Pract. 2016 Jun;66(647):e434-43. doi: 10.3399/bjgp16X684805. Epub 2016 Mar 29.
10
Long-term effects of a regional care pathway for patients with rectal cancer.直肠癌患者区域护理路径的长期效果
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015 Jun;30(6):787-95. doi: 10.1007/s00384-015-2209-7. Epub 2015 Apr 14.