Spinal Cord and Brain Injury Research Center, Department of Physiology, University of Kentucky College of Medicine, Lexington, Kentucky 40536-0509, USA.
J Neurotrauma. 2011 Nov;28(11):2245-62. doi: 10.1089/neu.2010.1499. Epub 2011 Apr 21.
Controlled cortical impact (CCI), one of the most common models of traumatic brain injury, is being increasingly used with mice for exploration of cell injury mechanisms and pre-clinical evaluation of therapeutic strategies. Although CCI brain injury was originally effected using an impactor with a rounded tip, the majority of studies with mouse CCI use a flat or beveled tip. Recent finite element modeling analyses demonstrate that tip geometry is a significant determinant of predicted cortical tissue strains in rat CCI, and that cell death is proportional to predicted tissue strains. In the current study, a three-dimensional finite element model of a C57BL/6J mouse brain predicted higher maximum principal strains during a simulated 1.0-mm, 3.5-m/s CCI injury with a flat tip when compared to a rounded tip. Consistent with this prediction, experimental CCI with a flat-tip impactor resulted in greater acute cortical hemorrhage and neuron loss in adult male C57BL/6J mice. The amount of neocortical tissue damage was equivalent for the two tip geometries at 9 days following injury, but the rate of neocortical neurodegeneration was markedly slower following CCI with a rounded-tip impactor, with damage reaching a plateau after 24?h as opposed to after 4?h for the flat tip. The flat-tip impactor was associated in general with more regional hippocampal neurodegeneration, especially at early time points such as 4?h. Impactor tip geometry did not have a notable effect on blood?brain barrier breakdown, traumatic axonal injury, or motor and cognitive dysfunction. Execution of CCI injury with a rounded-tip impactor is posited to provide a substantially enhanced temporal window for the study of cellular injury mechanisms and therapeutic intervention while maintaining critical aspects of the pathophysiological response to contusion brain injury.
皮质控制撞击(CCI)是一种常见的创伤性脑损伤模型,越来越多地被用于小鼠以探索细胞损伤机制和临床前评估治疗策略。尽管 CCI 脑损伤最初是使用带有圆形尖端的冲击器来实现的,但大多数使用小鼠 CCI 的研究都使用平或斜尖端。最近的有限元建模分析表明,尖端几何形状是大鼠 CCI 预测皮质组织应变的重要决定因素,细胞死亡与预测的组织应变成正比。在当前的研究中,与圆形尖端相比,使用平尖端进行模拟 1.0mm、3.5m/s 的 CCI 损伤时,C57BL/6J 小鼠大脑的三维有限元模型预测到的最大主应变更高。这一预测与实验结果一致,即使用平尖端冲击器进行 CCI 会导致成年雄性 C57BL/6J 小鼠急性皮质出血和神经元丢失增加。两种尖端几何形状在损伤后 9 天的新皮层组织损伤量相等,但使用圆形尖端冲击器进行 CCI 后的新皮层神经退行性变速度明显较慢,损伤在 24 小时后达到平台,而平尖端则在 4 小时后达到平台。一般来说,平尖端冲击器与更广泛的海马神经退行性变有关,尤其是在 4 小时等早期时间点。冲击器尖端几何形状对血脑屏障破裂、创伤性轴突损伤或运动和认知功能障碍没有明显影响。使用圆形尖端冲击器执行 CCI 损伤被认为提供了一个实质性增强的时间窗口,用于研究细胞损伤机制和治疗干预,同时保持对挫伤性脑损伤病理生理反应的关键方面。