Suppr超能文献

在基层医疗环境中评估睡眠障碍:病史询问与问卷比较。

Evaluation of sleep disorders in the primary care setting: history taking compared to questionnaires.

机构信息

Department of Family Medicine, MetroHealth Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA.

出版信息

J Clin Sleep Med. 2011 Feb 15;7(1):41-8.

Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to determine if primary care providers (PCPs) screen for sleep disorders during clinical evaluation of new patients, and to compare this to likely sleep diagnoses as assessed by validated questionnaires.

METHODS

Adult patients evaluated as new patients in a primary care clinic at a tertiary care center were included in a prospective study. Following their appointment, patients completed the Cleveland Sleep Habits questionnaire (CSHQ), Berlin questionnaire, Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), and STOP questionnaire. The encounters were subsequently reviewed for elements of a sleep history, sleep review of systems, and/or sleep workup.

RESULTS

101 patients participated in the study.

DEMOGRAPHICS

58 (52%) females, mean age 38 ± 12.9 years, body mass index (BMI) 29.5 ± 8.3 kg/m² (BMI > 30 kg/m² in 44%), 46% Caucasian, 38% African American, 11% Hispanic, and 5% other. House staff evaluated 57.4%; faculty evaluated the remainder. The ESS was > 10 in 28% of subjects. High risk for obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) risk was found in 33% (Berlin) and 34% (STOP) (24.8% by both). The CSHQ suggested possible diagnoses of insomnia in 30% and restless legs syndrome in 22%. In the clinic encounters, a limited sleep history was found in 24.8%, documentation of a sleep disorder in 8.9%, referral to sleep clinic in 2%, and referral to psychiatry clinic in 6.9%.

CONCLUSION

Symptoms suggestive of sleep disorders are common but are not routinely screened for in the primary care setting. Validated questionnaires can efficiently identify patients at risk for common sleep disorders in this setting.

摘要

研究目的

本研究旨在确定初级保健提供者(PCP)在对新患者进行临床评估时是否筛查睡眠障碍,并将其与通过验证问卷评估的可能睡眠诊断进行比较。

方法

在三级保健中心的初级保健诊所评估的成年新患者被纳入前瞻性研究。在预约后,患者完成克利夫兰睡眠习惯问卷(CSHQ)、柏林问卷、Epworth 嗜睡量表(ESS)和 STOP 问卷。随后对这些就诊进行回顾,以评估睡眠史、睡眠系统回顾和/或睡眠检查的相关内容。

结果

共有 101 名患者参与了这项研究。

人口统计学

58 名女性(52%),平均年龄 38 ± 12.9 岁,体重指数(BMI)29.5 ± 8.3 kg/m²(BMI > 30 kg/m² 占 44%),46%为白种人,38%为非裔美国人,11%为西班牙裔,5%为其他族裔。住院医师评估了 57.4%;其余由教员评估。ESS 评分> 10 的占 28%。33%(柏林)和 34%(STOP)发现阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停(OSA)风险高(两种方法的 24.8%)。CSHQ 提示可能患有失眠症的占 30%,不安腿综合征的占 22%。在就诊过程中,24.8%的患者存在睡眠史有限,8.9%的患者有睡眠障碍记录,2%的患者转诊至睡眠诊所,6.9%的患者转诊至精神科诊所。

结论

睡眠障碍的症状很常见,但在初级保健环境中并未常规筛查。在这种情况下,验证过的问卷可以有效地识别出有常见睡眠障碍风险的患者。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

8
Insomnia in primary care: Considerations for screening, assessment, and management.基层医疗中的失眠:筛查、评估及管理的考量因素
J Med Access. 2023 Mar 15;7:27550834231156727. doi: 10.1177/27550834231156727. eCollection 2023 Jan-Dec.
10
International Consensus Statement on Obstructive Sleep Apnea.国际阻塞性睡眠呼吸暂停共识声明。
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2023 Jul;13(7):1061-1482. doi: 10.1002/alr.23079. Epub 2023 Mar 30.

本文引用的文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验