1Musculoskeletal and Neurological Rehabilitation Research Group, Institute for Applied Health Research, School of Health, Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2011 Jul;50(7):1315-9. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/ker003. Epub 2011 Feb 23.
To translate the foot impact scale for RA (FIS-RA) to the dutch target language and to evaluate its internal construct validity using rasch analysis.
Forward and backward translations of the original English version of the FIS-RA scale, combined with synthesis techniques and expert committee review, were undertaken to produce a final Dutch version with two subscales for impairment/footwear (FIS-RA(IF)) and activity/participation (FIS-RA(AP)). The pre-final version was field tested in RA patients to investigate face and content validity. FIS-RA questionnaires were completed by 207 Dutch RA patients. Rasch analysis tested the data for overall fit to the model, item and person fit, unidimensionality, differential item function (DIF) by age, gender and disease duration, targeting, reliability and local response dependency. Item deletion and re-analysis were planned, where Rasch model assumptions were violated.
The FIS-RA(IF) (P < 0.0001) and FIS-RA(AP) (P < 0.0001) subscales did not fit the overall Rasch model. Misfitting items, DIF by age, gender and disease duration, and local response dependency were observed in both subscales. Item thresholds showed good coverage over both scales although a floor effect was observed for the FIS-RA(AP) subscale. The person separation index was 0.81 and 0.92 for the FIS-RA(IF) and FIS-RA(AP) subscales, respectively. Both subscales were not unidimensional. Item deletion and repeat Rasch analysis produced two subscales that fitted the Rasch model and were unidimensional.
A Dutch language version of the FIS-RA questionnaire was successfully developed using Rasch analysis. Subscales for impairment/footwear and activity/participation showed good construct validity and were unidimensional.
将类风湿关节炎足部影响量表(FIS-RA)翻译为荷兰语,并使用 Rasch 分析评估其内部结构效度。
对 FIS-RA 量表的原始英文版本进行正向和反向翻译,结合综合技术和专家委员会审查,生成最终的荷兰语版本,包括两个子量表:损伤/鞋类(FIS-RA(IF))和活动/参与(FIS-RA(AP))。预终版在 RA 患者中进行了现场测试,以评估其表面效度和内容效度。207 名荷兰 RA 患者完成了 FIS-RA 问卷。Rasch 分析测试了数据对模型、项目和个体拟合、单维性、年龄、性别和疾病持续时间的差异项目功能(DIF)、目标、可靠性和局部反应依赖性的整体拟合情况。计划对违反 Rasch 模型假设的项目进行删除和重新分析。
FIS-RA(IF)(P < 0.0001)和 FIS-RA(AP)(P < 0.0001)子量表均不符合总体 Rasch 模型。在两个子量表中均观察到不拟合项目、年龄、性别和疾病持续时间的 DIF 以及局部反应依赖性。虽然在 FIS-RA(AP)子量表中观察到地板效应,但项目阈值在两个量表上均有良好的覆盖范围。个体分离指数分别为 FIS-RA(IF)和 FIS-RA(AP)子量表的 0.81 和 0.92。两个子量表均非单维。项目删除和重复 Rasch 分析生成了两个符合 Rasch 模型且单维的子量表。
使用 Rasch 分析成功开发了 FIS-RA 问卷的荷兰语版本。损伤/鞋类和活动/参与子量表具有良好的结构效度和单维性。