Ledermann Jeremy P, Lorono-Pino Maria A, Ellis Christine, Saxton-Shaw Kali D, Blitvich Bradley J, Beaty Barry J, Bowen Richard A, Powers Ann M
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Division of Vector-Borne Infectious Diseases, 3150 Rampart Road, Fort Collins, CO 80521, USA.
Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2011 Apr;18(4):580-7. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00201-10. Epub 2011 Feb 23.
Primary West Nile virus (WNV) infections can be diagnosed using a number of tests that detect infectious particles, nucleic acid, and specific IgM and/or IgG antibodies. However, serological identification of the infecting agent in secondary or subsequent flavivirus infections is problematic due to the extensive cross-reactivity of flavivirus antibodies. This is particularly difficult in the tropical Americas where multiple flaviviruses cocirculate. A study of sequential flavivirus infection in horses was undertaken using three medically important flaviviruses and five widely utilized diagnostic assays to determine if WNV infection in horses that had a previous St. Louis encephalitis virus (SLEV) or dengue virus type 2 (DENV-2) infection could be diagnosed. Following the primary inoculation, 25% (3/12) and 75% (3/4) of the horses mounted antibody responses against SLEV and DENV-2, respectively. Eighty-eight percent of horses subsequently inoculated with WNV had a WNV-specific antibody response that could be detected with one of these assays. The plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT) was sensitive in detection but lacked specificity, especially following repeated flavivirus exposure. The WNV-specific IgM enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (IgM ELISA) was able to detect an IgM antibody response and was not cross-reactive in a primary SLEV or DENV response. The WNV-specific blocking ELISA was specific, showing positives only following a WNV injection. Of great importance, we demonstrated that timing of sample collection and the need for multiple samples are important, as the infecting etiology could be misdiagnosed if only a single sample is tested.
原发性西尼罗河病毒(WNV)感染可以通过多种检测方法进行诊断,这些检测方法能够检测出感染性颗粒、核酸以及特异性IgM和/或IgG抗体。然而,在继发性或后续黄病毒感染中,由于黄病毒抗体存在广泛的交叉反应性,对感染病原体进行血清学鉴定存在问题。在热带美洲地区,多种黄病毒共同流行,这一情况尤为困难。本研究使用三种具有医学重要性的黄病毒和五种广泛应用的诊断检测方法,对马的连续性黄病毒感染进行了研究,以确定先前感染过圣路易斯脑炎病毒(SLEV)或2型登革热病毒(DENV - 2)的马是否能被诊断出感染WNV。初次接种后,分别有25%(3/12)和75%(3/4)的马对SLEV和DENV - 2产生了抗体反应。随后接种WNV的马中,88%产生了可通过这些检测方法之一检测到的WNV特异性抗体反应。蚀斑减少中和试验(PRNT)检测灵敏,但缺乏特异性,尤其是在反复接触黄病毒之后。WNV特异性IgM酶联免疫吸附试验(IgM ELISA)能够检测到IgM抗体反应,并且在原发性SLEV或DENV反应中无交叉反应。WNV特异性阻断ELISA具有特异性,仅在注射WNV后呈阳性。非常重要的是,我们证明了样本采集的时间以及需要采集多个样本很重要,因为如果只检测单个样本,感染病因可能会被误诊。