Department of Physical Therapy, Toyohashi SOZO University, 20-1 Matsushita, Ushikawa-cho, Toyohashi 440-8511, Japan.
J Neurophysiol. 2011 May;105(5):2157-68. doi: 10.1152/jn.00569.2010. Epub 2011 Feb 23.
We examined whether individuals with spastic diplegic cerebral palsy (SDCP) have the ability to utilize lower leg muscles in anticipatory postural adjustments (APAs) associated with voluntary arm movement while standing, as well as the ability to modulate APAs with changes in the degree of postural perturbation caused by arm movement. Seven individuals with spastic diplegia (SDCP group, 12-22 yr of age) and seven age- and sex-matched individuals without disability (control group) participated in this study. Participants flexed both shoulders and lifted a load under two different load conditions, during which electromyographic activities of focal and postural muscles were recorded. Although the timing of anticipatory activation of the erector spinae and medial hamstring (MH) muscles was similar in the two participant groups, that of the gastrocnemius (GcM) muscle was significantly later in the SDCP group than in the control group. An increase in anticipatory postural muscle activity with an increase in load was observed in MH and GcM in the control group but not in GcM in the SDCP group. The degree of modulation in MH was significantly smaller in the SDCP group than in the control group. An additional experiment confirmed that these differences in APAs between the two participant groups were unlikely to be attributable to their differences in initial standing posture before load lift. The present findings suggest that lower leg muscles play a minor role in APAs in individuals with spastic diplegia. In addition, it is likely that these individuals have difficulty modulating anticipatory postural muscle activity with changes in the degree of postural perturbation.
我们研究了痉挛性双瘫脑瘫(SDCP)患者在站立时进行主动手臂运动时,是否具有利用小腿肌肉进行预期姿势调整(APAs)的能力,以及是否能够根据手臂运动引起的姿势干扰程度的变化来调节 APAs。7 名痉挛性双瘫患者(SDCP 组,12-22 岁)和 7 名年龄和性别匹配的无残疾个体(对照组)参加了这项研究。参与者在两种不同的负载条件下弯曲双肩并抬起负载,在此过程中记录了焦点和姿势肌肉的肌电图活动。虽然两组参与者的竖脊肌和内侧半腱肌(MH)肌肉的预期激活时间相似,但 SDCP 组的比目鱼肌(GcM)肌肉的激活时间明显晚于对照组。在对照组中,MH 和 GcM 的预期姿势肌肉活动随着负载的增加而增加,但在 SDCP 组中,GcM 则不然。SDCP 组 MH 的调节程度明显小于对照组。一项额外的实验证实,这两组参与者之间的 APAs 差异不太可能归因于他们在负载提起前的初始站立姿势差异。本研究结果表明,痉挛性双瘫患者的小腿肌肉在 APAs 中作用较小。此外,这些个体可能难以根据姿势干扰程度的变化来调节预期姿势肌肉活动。