Koch Karen A, Woodcock Michael W, Harris Marcelline R
Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2010 Nov 13;2010:397-401.
The machineable representation and execution of clinical guidelines has been the focus of research efforts for some time, however there is less examination of whether the methods and techniques for guidelines are sufficient for clinical protocols. The objective of this study was to test the feasibility of using the Guideline Elements Model II (GEM II) and GEM Cutter for the representation of clinical protocols, specifically clinical protocols commonly used by nurses. After downloading the GEM Cutter 2.5, we decomposed a set of clinical protocols and analyzed the completeness in which elemental protocol data was represented. One of the most complicated of these protocols (extravasations of infused medication) is presented as an example. While GEM II adequately represents core elements of clinical protocols at the high level, it was not possible to adequately represent sequence and associated role based permissions via use of conditional criteria at branching and procedural levels. Functionality of the tool would also be enhanced with more robust terminology management and support for multi-authoring.
一段时间以来,临床指南的可机器处理表示和执行一直是研究工作的重点,然而,对于指南的方法和技术是否足以用于临床方案的研究较少。本研究的目的是测试使用指南要素模型II(GEM II)和GEM切割器来表示临床方案的可行性,特别是护士常用的临床方案。下载GEM切割器2.5后,我们分解了一组临床方案,并分析了基本方案数据表示的完整性。其中最复杂的一个方案(输注药物外渗)作为示例呈现。虽然GEM II在高层次上充分表示了临床方案的核心要素,但通过在分支和程序级别使用条件标准,无法充分表示顺序和基于角色的相关权限。通过更强大的术语管理和对多作者的支持,该工具的功能也将得到增强。