Sönksen Ute Wolff, Christensen Jens Jørgen, Nielsen Lisbeth, Hesselbjerg Annemarie, Hansen Dennis Schrøder, Bruun Brita
Department of Clinical Microbiology, Hillerød Hospital, Hillerød, Denmark.
Open Microbiol J. 2010 Dec 31;4:123-31. doi: 10.2174/1874285801004010123.
Taxonomy and identification of fastidious Gram negatives are evolving and challenging. We compared identifications achieved with the Vitek 2 Neisseria-Haemophilus (NH) card and partial 16S rRNA gene sequence (526 bp stretch) analysis with identifications obtained with extensive phenotypic characterization using 100 fastidious Gram negative bacteria. Seventy-five strains represented 21 of the 26 taxa included in the Vitek 2 NH database and 25 strains represented related species not included in the database. Of the 100 strains, 31 were the type strains of the species. Vitek 2 NH identification results: 48 of 75 database strains were correctly identified, 11 strains gave `low discrimination´, seven strains were unidentified, and nine strains were misidentified. Identification of 25 non-database strains resulted in 14 strains incorrectly identified as belonging to species in the database. Partial 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis results: For 76 strains phenotypic and sequencing identifications were identical, for 23 strains the sequencing identifications were either probable or possible, and for one strain only the genus was confirmed. Thus, the Vitek 2 NH system identifies most of the commonly occurring species included in the database. Some strains of rarely occurring species and strains of non-database species closely related to database species cause problems. Partial 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis performs well, but does not always suffice, additional phenotypical characterization being useful for final identification.
苛养革兰氏阴性菌的分类学和鉴定方法不断发展且颇具挑战性。我们使用100株苛养革兰氏阴性菌,将Vitek 2奈瑟菌-嗜血杆菌(NH)卡和部分16S rRNA基因序列(526 bp片段)分析的鉴定结果与通过广泛表型特征分析获得的鉴定结果进行了比较。75株菌株代表了Vitek 2 NH数据库中26个分类单元中的21个,25株菌株代表了数据库中未包含的相关物种。在这100株菌株中,31株是该物种的模式菌株。Vitek 2 NH鉴定结果:75株数据库菌株中有48株被正确鉴定,11株给出“低鉴别度”结果,7株未被鉴定,9株被错误鉴定。对25株非数据库菌株的鉴定导致14株被错误鉴定为数据库中的物种。部分16S rRNA基因序列分析结果:76株菌株的表型和测序鉴定结果一致,23株菌株的测序鉴定结果为可能或有可能,1株菌株仅确认了属。因此,Vitek 2 NH系统可鉴定数据库中大多数常见物种。一些罕见物种的菌株以及与数据库物种密切相关的非数据库物种的菌株会导致问题。部分16S rRNA基因序列分析表现良好,但并不总是足够的,额外的表型特征分析对最终鉴定很有用。