Ochi Kensuke, Horiuchi Yukio, Tanabe Aya, Morita Kozo, Takeda Kentaro, Ninomiya Ken
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kawasaki Municipal Kawasaki Hospital, Kawasaki City, Kanagawa, Japan.
J Hand Surg Am. 2011 May;36(5):782-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2010.12.019. Epub 2011 Feb 23.
To compare the shoulder internal rotation test-a new, provocative test-with the elbow flexion test in the diagnosis of cubital tunnel syndrome (CubTS).
Twenty-five patients with CubTS were examined before and after surgery with 10 seconds each of the elbow flexion and shoulder internal rotation tests. Fifty-four asymptomatic individuals and 14 neuropathy patients with a diagnosis other than CubTS were also examined as control cases. For the shoulder internal rotation test, the patient's upper extremity was kept at 90° abduction, maximum internal rotation, and 10° flexion at the shoulder, with 90° elbow flexion and neutral position of the forearm and wrist, with finger extension. Test results were considered positive if any slight symptom attributable to CubTS occurred within 10 seconds. Extraneural pressure inside the cubital tunnel was intraoperatively measured with the positions of both the elbow flexion and shoulder internal rotation tests, in 15 of the CubTS cases. Statistical analyses were performed using Student's t-test with a confidence level of 95%.
The preoperative sensitivity in CubTS cases was 80% in the 10-second shoulder internal rotation test and 36% in the 10-second elbow flexion test, and these differences were significant. None of the control cases had positive results in either test. All the CubTS cases improved with surgery; after surgery, neither test provoked symptoms in any surgical patient. The extraneural pressure increased in both provocative positions with no significant difference.
Positive results for the 10-second shoulder internal rotation test were more sensitive than that for the elbow flexion test of the same duration and seemed specific to CubTS.
比较一种新的激发试验——肩部内旋试验与屈肘试验在诊断肘管综合征(CubTS)中的效果。
25例肘管综合征患者在手术前后分别进行了10秒的屈肘试验和肩部内旋试验。另外,54名无症状个体和14名诊断为非肘管综合征的神经病变患者作为对照病例也接受了检查。对于肩部内旋试验,患者上肢保持在肩部外展90°、最大内旋、屈曲10°,肘部屈曲90°,前臂和手腕处于中立位,手指伸展。如果在10秒内出现任何可归因于肘管综合征的轻微症状,则试验结果被视为阳性。在15例肘管综合征病例中,术中测量了屈肘试验和肩部内旋试验两种体位下肘管内的神经外压力。采用置信水平为95%的学生t检验进行统计分析。
在肘管综合征病例中,10秒肩部内旋试验的术前敏感性为80%,10秒屈肘试验的术前敏感性为36%,这些差异具有统计学意义。所有对照病例在两种试验中均未出现阳性结果。所有肘管综合征病例术后均有改善;术后,两种试验均未在任何手术患者中诱发症状。在两种激发体位下,神经外压力均升高,但差异无统计学意义。
10秒肩部内旋试验的阳性结果比相同持续时间的屈肘试验更敏感,且似乎对肘管综合征具有特异性。