Inuzuka K
Department of Pediatric Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Aichi-Gakuin University, Nagoya, Japan.
Aichi Gakuin Daigaku Shigakkai Shi. 1990 Sep;28(3):803-27.
Growth process was analyzed on the primary dentition having bilateral distal step of the terminal plane. Plaster models and cephalometrics of 32 cases were examined. They were taken in the following five developmental periods: Hellman's Dental Ages IIA, eruption of the first molars, eruption of the maxillary central incisors, eruption of the maxillary lateral incisors, and half a year past the eruption of the maxillary lateral incisors. The measurement of plaster models was taken on the mesiodistal crown diameter, the interdental spaces in the primary dentition, the traverse width of the dental arches, and the arch length. Cephalometric analysis was made on 21 linear items together with 6 proportional items, 18 angular items, and coordinates. For a control group, plaster models and cephalometrics of 12 cases having normal occlusion were also analyzed in the same areas as the examined group. These normal cases were chosen according to Kito's criteria of normal occlusion. Comparisons were made between the two groups and the results were as follows: 1. Growth process data obtained from the plaster models 1) There was no significant difference between the mesiodistal crown diameter of the two groups except in the mandibular deciduous central incisors. 2) Concerning the total interdental spaces from the primary canine to the opposite canine, the examined group showed longer spaces in the mandibular dentition (3.03 millimeters on the average) than the control group (1.83 millimeters on the average) (p less than 0.05). 3) Concerning the transverse width of the arches, in the maxillary dentition, the examined group showed a narrower width than the control group through all developmental periods (p less than 0.05), and in the mandibular dentition, the examined group showed wider intercanine width than the control group. However, there was no significant difference between the two groups in the growth process of the transverse width. 4) The examined group showed a longer arch length than the control group in the mandibular dentition in the period of Dental Age IIA (p less than 0.05). 2. Growth process data obtained from cephalometrics 1) Linear growth data in the skeletal pattern (1) The examined group showed a larger dimension in the total cranial base length (N-Ar), the posterior cranial base length (S-Ar), and the posterior facial height (S-Go) than the control group through all developmental periods (p less than 0.05). However, there was no significant difference between the two groups in the quantitative growth.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
对具有双侧终末平面远中台阶的乳牙列生长过程进行了分析。检查了32例患者的石膏模型和头影测量数据。这些数据采集于以下五个发育阶段:赫尔曼牙龄IIA期、第一恒磨牙萌出期、上颌中切牙萌出期、上颌侧切牙萌出期以及上颌侧切牙萌出半年后。对石膏模型的测量包括近远中牙冠直径、乳牙列中的牙间隙、牙弓的横向宽度和牙弓长度。对头影测量进行了21项线性指标、6项比例指标、18项角度指标及坐标的分析。对于对照组,还对12例咬合正常患者的石膏模型和头影测量数据在与研究组相同的区域进行了分析。这些正常病例是根据木户正常咬合标准选取的。对两组进行了比较,结果如下:1. 从石膏模型获得的生长过程数据 1)除下颌乳中切牙外,两组的近远中牙冠直径无显著差异。2)关于从乳尖牙到对侧尖牙的总牙间隙,研究组下颌牙列的间隙(平均3.03毫米)比对照组(平均1.83毫米)长(p<0.05)。3)关于牙弓的横向宽度,在上颌牙列中,研究组在所有发育阶段的宽度均比对照组窄(p<0.05),在下颌牙列中,研究组的尖牙间宽度比对照组宽。然而,两组在横向宽度的生长过程中无显著差异。4)在牙龄IIA期,研究组下颌牙列的牙弓长度比对照组长(p<0.05)。2. 从头影测量获得的生长过程数据 1)骨骼模式的线性生长数据 (1)研究组在所有发育阶段的颅底全长(N-Ar)、后颅底长度(S-Ar)和后面高(S-Go)尺寸均比对照组大(p<0.05)。然而,两组在定量生长方面无显著差异。(摘要截断于400字)