Department of Psychology, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA.
Alcohol Clin Exp Res. 2011 Jun;35(6):1160-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-0277.2011.01449.x. Epub 2011 Feb 25.
Alcohol exposure in the rat on postnatal days (PD) 4 to 9 is known to partially damage the hippocampus and to impair hippocampus-dependent behavioral tasks. We previously reported that PD4 to 9 alcohol exposure eliminated the context preexposure facilitation effect (CPFE) in juvenile rats, a hippocampus-dependent variant of contextual fear conditioning. In the CPFE, context exposure and immediate shock occur on successive occasions and this produces conditioned freezing relative to a control group that is not preexposed to the training context. Here, we extend our earlier findings by examining the effects of neonatal alcohol administered at multiple doses or over different neonatal exposure periods.
Rat pups (male and female) were exposed to a single binge dose of alcohol at one of 3 doses (2.75, 4.00, or 5.25 g/kg/d) over PD4 to 9 (Experiment 1) or to 5.25 g over PD4 to 6 or PD7 to 9 (Experiment 2). Sham-intubated (SI) and undisturbed (UD) rats served as controls. On PD31, rats were preexposed to either the training context (Pre) or an alternate context (No-Pre). On PD32, rats received an immediate unsignaled footshock (1.5 mA, 2 seconds) in the training context. Finally, on PD33, all rats were returned to the training context and tested for contextual freezing over a 5-minute period.
Undisturbed- and SI-Pre rats showed the CPFE, i.e., context preexposure facilitated contextual conditioning, relative to their No-Pre counterparts. The immediate shock deficit was present in all No-Pre groups, regardless of previous alcohol exposure. In Experiment 1, blood alcohol level was negatively correlated with contextual freezing. Group 2.75 g-Pre did not differ from controls. Group 4.00 g-Pre froze significantly less than Groups UD- and SI-Pre but more than Group 5.25-Pre, which showed the immediate shock deficit. In Experiment 2, alcohol exposure limited to PD7 to 9, but not PD4 to 6, disrupted the CPFE.
This is the first demonstration of dose-related impairment on a hippocampus-dependent task produced by neonatal alcohol exposure in the rat. Exposure period effects support previous studies of alcohol and spatial learning. The CPFE is a more sensitive behavioral task that can be used to elucidate developmental alcohol-induced deficits over a range of alcohol doses that are more relevant to human exposure levels.
已知在大鼠出生后第 4 至 9 天内暴露于酒精会部分损害海马体,并损害依赖海马体的行为任务。我们之前报道过,PD4 至 9 天的酒精暴露消除了幼年大鼠的情景预暴露促进效应(CPFE),这是情景恐惧条件反射的一种依赖海马体的变体。在 CPFE 中,情景暴露和即时电击在连续的情况下发生,这会导致相对于未暴露于训练情景的对照组产生条件性冻结。在这里,我们通过检查在多个剂量或不同的新生儿暴露期内给予新生酒精的影响来扩展我们早期的发现。
雄性和雌性大鼠幼崽在 PD4 至 9 天期间接受单次 binge 剂量的酒精,剂量为 3 种(2.75、4.00 或 5.25 g/kg/d)(实验 1)或 PD4 至 6 或 PD7 至 9 期间接受 5.25 g 酒精(实验 2)。假插管(SI)和未干扰(UD)大鼠作为对照。在 PD31 时,大鼠预暴露于训练情景(Pre)或替代情景(No-Pre)。在 PD32 时,大鼠在训练情景中接受立即无信号的足底电击(1.5 mA,2 秒)。最后,在 PD33 时,所有大鼠返回训练情景,并在 5 分钟内进行情景冻结测试。
UD- 和 SI-Pre 大鼠相对于 No-Pre 大鼠表现出 CPFE,即情景预暴露促进了情景条件反射,而所有 No-Pre 组均出现即时电击缺陷,无论之前是否暴露于酒精。在实验 1 中,血液酒精水平与情景冻结呈负相关。2.75 g 组与对照组无差异。4.00 g 组的冻结明显少于 UD- 和 SI-Pre 组,但多于 5.25-Pre 组,后者表现出即时电击缺陷。在实验 2 中,仅限于 PD7 至 9 天的酒精暴露而不是 PD4 至 6 天的酒精暴露破坏了 CPFE。
这是首次证明大鼠新生期酒精暴露对依赖海马体的任务产生剂量相关损伤。暴露期效应支持以前关于酒精和空间学习的研究。CPFE 是一种更敏感的行为任务,可以用于阐明在与人类暴露水平更相关的一系列酒精剂量下,发育性酒精引起的缺陷。