Suppr超能文献

澳大利亚一肾脏中心估算肾小球滤过率的不准确性。

Inaccuracies in estimated glomerular filtration rate in one Australian renal centre.

机构信息

Department of Renal Medicine, St George Hospital and University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

Nephrology (Carlton). 2011 Jul;16(5):486-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1797.2011.01453.x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Early identification of true renal disease (glomerular filtration rate (GFR) < 60 mL/min) results in better patient outcomes. There is now routine reporting in Australia of estimated GFR (eGFR) in all patients over age 18 who have serum creatinine measured, calculated by the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) formula, which was validated in an American Caucasian cohort. Significant clinical decisions and prognosis are often made on the basis of this calculation.

AIM

To assess the accuracy of three estimates of GFR in an Australian population by comparing eGFR obtained by the abbreviated MDRD (aMDRD), Cockcroft-Gault corrected for body surface area (BSA) (CG) and Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology (CKD-Epi) formulae with a gold standard, isotopic (51) Cr-ethylenediaminetetra-acetic acid ((51) Cr-EDTA) GFR.

METHODS

Patients referred with an eGFR of <60 mL/min reported by the aMDRD formula underwent isotopic measurement of GFR (over 4 h) and had eGFR calculated using CG corrected for BSA, aMDRD and CKD-Epi formulae. Data were analysed using Bland-Altman plots and regression analysis to compare methods; bias, precision and the proportion of patients correctly stratified by stage of chronic kidney disease (CKD) were also compared according to the three estimates of GFR, using (51) Cr-EDTA GFR as the gold standard.

RESULTS

A total of 139 patients were recruited (female 45%), mean age 64 years and mean serum creatinine 212 µmol/L. The mean GFR (SD) (mL/min per m(2) ) for isotopic, CG, aMDRD and CKD-Epi were 47 (28), 37 (20), 32 (17) and 33 (18) (P = 0.001). CG (57%) was more likely to correctly stage CKD than aMDRD (37%) or CKD-Epi (37%), and absolute bias was significantly lower using CG than either other method (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In this small Australian population the CG formula corrected for BSA agreed more closely with isotopic GFR and correctly staged patients with CKD more often than the aMDRD or CKD-Epi formulae. It is important that each renal Unit considers the accuracy of estimates of GFR according to their population demographics.

摘要

背景

早期识别真正的肾脏疾病(肾小球滤过率(GFR)<60mL/min)可改善患者预后。目前,在澳大利亚,所有年龄超过 18 岁且血清肌酐测量值的患者都会常规报告估算的 GFR(eGFR),这些值是通过肾脏病饮食改良公式(MDRD)计算的,该公式在一个美国白种人队列中得到了验证。通常会根据该计算结果做出重要的临床决策和预后判断。

目的

通过比较三种 GFR 估算方法(简化 MDRD 公式(aMDRD)、按体表面积校正的 Cockcroft-Gault 公式(CG)和慢性肾脏病流行病学公式(CKD-Epi))与金标准同位素(51)Cr-乙二胺四乙酸((51)Cr-EDTA)GFR,评估这三种方法在澳大利亚人群中的准确性。

方法

通过 aMDRD 公式报告 eGFR<60mL/min 的患者,接受同位素(4 小时)GFR 测量,并使用 CG 校正的 BSA、aMDRD 和 CKD-Epi 公式计算 eGFR。使用 Bland-Altman 图和回归分析比较方法;还根据三种 GFR 估算方法,使用(51)Cr-EDTA GFR 作为金标准,比较各方法的偏差、精度和按慢性肾脏病(CKD)分期正确分层的患者比例。

结果

共纳入 139 例患者(女性 45%),平均年龄 64 岁,平均血清肌酐 212μmol/L。同位素、CG、aMDRD 和 CKD-Epi 的平均 GFR(SD)(mL/min per m2)分别为 47(28)、37(20)、32(17)和 33(18)(P=0.001)。CG(57%)比 aMDRD(37%)或 CKD-Epi(37%)更有可能正确分期 CKD,且 CG 比其他任何方法的绝对偏差均显著更小(P=0.001)。

结论

在这个小型澳大利亚人群中,与同位素 GFR 相比,按体表面积校正的 CG 公式更符合,并且比 aMDRD 或 CKD-Epi 公式更频繁地正确分期 CKD。每个肾脏单位都应根据其人群特征考虑 GFR 估算的准确性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验