Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow G12 0YN, United Kingdom.
Department of Nuclear Medicine, Gartnavel Hospital, Glasgow G12 0YN, United Kingdom.
Eur J Cancer. 2014 Mar;50(5):944-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2013.12.021. Epub 2014 Jan 17.
Single cycle carboplatin, dosed by glomerular filtration rate (GFR), is standard adjuvant therapy for stage 1 seminoma. Accurate measurement of GFR is essential for correct dosing. Isotopic methods remain the gold standard for the determination of GFR. Formulae to estimate GFR have improved the assessment of renal function in non-oncological settings. We assessed the utility of these formulae for carboplatin dosing.
We studied consecutive subjects receiving adjuvant carboplatin for stage 1 seminoma at our institution between 2007 and 2012. Subjects underwent 51Cr-ethylene diamine tetra-acetic acid (EDTA) measurement of GFR with carboplatin dose calculated using the Calvert formula. Theoretical carboplatin doses were calculated from estimated GFR using Chronic Kidney Disease-Epidemiology (CKD-EPI), Management of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) and Cockcroft-Gault (CG) formulae with additional correction for actual body surface area (BSA). Carboplatin doses calculated by formulae were compared with dose calculated by isotopic GFR; a difference <10% was considered acceptable.
115 patients were identified. Mean isotopic GFR was 96.9 ml/min/1.73 m(2). CG and CKD-EPI tended to overestimate GFR whereas MDRD tended to underestimate GFR. The CKD-EPI formula had greatest accuracy. The CKD-EPI formula, corrected for actual BSA, performed best; 45.9% of patients received within 10% of correct carboplatin dose. Patients predicted as underdosed (13.5%) by CKD-EPI were more likely to be obese (p=0.013); there were no predictors of the 40.5% receiving an excess dose.
Our data support further evaluation of the CKD-EPI formula in this patient population but clinically significant variances in carboplatin dosing occur using non-isotopic methods of GFR estimation. Isotopic determination of GFR should remain the recommended standard for carboplatin dosing when accuracy is essential.
根据肾小球滤过率(GFR)给药的单周期卡铂是 1 期精原细胞瘤的标准辅助治疗。准确测量 GFR 对于正确给药至关重要。同位素方法仍然是 GFR 测定的金标准。公式可改善非肿瘤环境下肾功能的评估。我们评估了这些公式在卡铂给药中的作用。
我们研究了 2007 年至 2012 年在我们机构接受 1 期精原细胞瘤辅助卡铂治疗的连续患者。患者接受 51Cr-乙二胺四乙酸(EDTA)GFR 测量,并用卡铂剂量计算 Calvert 公式。使用慢性肾脏病-流行病学(CKD-EPI)、肾脏病饮食管理(MDRD)和 Cockcroft-Gault(CG)公式并对实际体表面积(BSA)进行额外校正,从估计的 GFR 计算理论卡铂剂量。公式计算的卡铂剂量与同位素 GFR 计算的剂量进行比较;差值<10%被认为是可以接受的。
共确定了 115 例患者。平均同位素 GFR 为 96.9 ml/min/1.73 m2。CG 和 CKD-EPI 倾向于高估 GFR,而 MDRD 倾向于低估 GFR。CKD-EPI 公式最准确。经实际 BSA 校正的 CKD-EPI 公式表现最佳;45.9%的患者接受的卡铂剂量在 10%以内。CKD-EPI 预测的剂量不足(13.5%)的患者更有可能肥胖(p=0.013);没有任何预测指标可以预测 40.5%的患者接受过量剂量。
我们的数据支持在该患者人群中进一步评估 CKD-EPI 公式,但使用非同位素方法估计 GFR 会导致卡铂剂量出现临床显著差异。当准确性至关重要时,同位素测定 GFR 应仍然是卡铂给药的推荐标准。