Tassani Simone, Particelli Francesca, Perilli Egon, Traina Francesco, Baruffaldi Fabio, Viceconti Marco
Laboratorio di Tecnologia Medica, Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via di Barbiano 1/10, Bologna, Italy.
Clin Biomech (Bristol). 2011 Jul;26(6):632-9. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2011.01.010. Epub 2011 Feb 25.
The mechanical characterization of trabecular bone is related to its structure. In order to describe the trabecular structure and to study the mechanical behavior of the trabecular tissue, several parameters are presented in the literature. Some studies suggest a possible dependence of the structure on bone volume fraction; this dependence could bias the validity of previous studies. The problem increases its complexity when pathological bone such as osteoarthritic tissue is studied, where the organization of the trabecular structure could be different if compared to the non-pathological tissue. The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the dependence between trabecular structure and bone volume fraction. The secondary aim was to compare osteoarthritic and non-pathological bone considering the correlation between structure and bone volume fraction.
Sixty trabecular bone specimens were extracted from femoral heads of two groups of 30 Caucasian donors; an osteoarthritic group and a non-pathological group. Several structural parameters, such as bone volume fraction, direct trabecular thickness, fabric tensor eigenvalues and their normalizations, were calculated from micro-CT analysis. A statistical analysis was carried out to identify the dependences between structural parameters and bone volume fraction. The comparison between osteoarthritic bone and non-pathological bone was also performed.
Only the normalized eigenvalues of the fabric tensor were not correlated to bone volume fraction (R<0.5). The first and second normalized eigenvalues were significantly different between osteoarthritic bone and non-pathological bone (respectively P<0.05 and P<0.001).
In conclusion, orientation and anisotropy of the trabecular structure do not depend on bone volume fraction. Moreover, differences in the first and second normalized fabric tensor eigenvalues suggest in the osteoarthritic group a structure more oriented along the main trabecular direction.
松质骨的力学特性与其结构相关。为了描述松质骨结构并研究松质组织的力学行为,文献中提出了几个参数。一些研究表明结构可能依赖于骨体积分数;这种依赖性可能会使先前研究的有效性产生偏差。当研究诸如骨关节炎组织等病理性骨时,该问题会变得更加复杂,因为与非病理性组织相比,松质骨结构的组织可能不同。本研究的主要目的是评估松质骨结构与骨体积分数之间的依赖性。次要目的是考虑结构与骨体积分数之间的相关性,比较骨关节炎骨和非病理性骨。
从两组各30名白种人供体的股骨头中提取60个松质骨标本;一组为骨关节炎组,另一组为非病理性组。通过显微CT分析计算了几个结构参数,如骨体积分数、直接小梁厚度、结构张量特征值及其归一化值。进行了统计分析以确定结构参数与骨体积分数之间的依赖性。还对骨关节炎骨和非病理性骨进行了比较。
只有结构张量的归一化特征值与骨体积分数不相关(R<0.5)。骨关节炎骨和非病理性骨之间的第一和第二归一化特征值有显著差异(分别为P<0.05和P<0.001)。
总之,松质骨结构的取向和各向异性不依赖于骨体积分数。此外,第一和第二归一化结构张量特征值的差异表明骨关节炎组中的结构更沿主要小梁方向取向。