Suppr超能文献

脊髓损伤后的收入和死亡率风险。

Income and risk of mortality after spinal cord injury.

机构信息

College of Health Professions, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Mar;92(3):339-45. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.09.032.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the association of household income and formal education with risk of mortality after spinal cord injury (SCI).

DESIGN

Cohort study.

SETTING

Twenty hospitals designated as Model SCI Systems of care in the United States.

PARTICIPANTS

Adults (N=8027) with traumatic SCI, seen in one of the Model SCI Systems, who had at least 1 follow-up assessment between 1995 and 2006. All participants were at least 1 year postinjury at the time of assessment. There were 57,957 person-years and 1036 deaths. The follow-up period started with the first assessment between 1995 and 2006 and went until either the date of death or March 2009.

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Mortality status was determined by routine follow-up supplemented by using the Social Security Death Index. A logistic regression model was developed to estimate the chance of dying in any given year.

RESULTS

Educational status and income were significantly predictive of mortality after adjusting for age, sex, race, and severity of injury. Compared with those with household income of $75,000 or greater, the odds of mortality was greater for those who had income between $25,000 and $75,000 (1.61) and still higher for those with less than $25,000 a year (2.41). Life expectancy differed more as a function of household income than the economic subscale of the Craig Handicap Assessment and Reporting Technique.

CONCLUSION

There was a clear gradation in survival based on familial income (high, middle, low), not just an effect of the lowest income.

摘要

目的

评估家庭收入和正规教育与脊髓损伤(SCI)后死亡率的关系。

设计

队列研究。

地点

美国 20 家指定为模范 SCI 护理系统的医院。

参与者

1995 年至 2006 年间在一家模范 SCI 护理系统中就诊的、患有创伤性 SCI 的成年人(N=8027),这些患者至少有 1 次在 1995 年至 2006 年期间进行了随访评估。所有患者在评估时均至少有 1 年的损伤后时间。共随访 57957 人年,有 1036 人死亡。随访期从 1995 年至 2006 年的首次评估开始,持续到死亡日期或 2009 年 3 月。

干预措施

无。

主要观察指标

通过常规随访和使用社会保障死亡索引确定死亡率状态。建立了一个逻辑回归模型来估计任何给定年份死亡的几率。

结果

在调整年龄、性别、种族和损伤严重程度后,教育程度和收入状况显著预测死亡率。与家庭收入在 75000 美元或以上的患者相比,家庭收入在 25000 至 75000 美元之间的患者的死亡率几率更高(1.61),家庭收入低于 25000 美元的患者的死亡率几率更高(2.41)。预期寿命的差异更多地取决于家庭收入,而不是 Craig 残疾评估和报告技术的经济子量表。

结论

基于家庭收入(高、中、低)存在明显的生存率梯度,而不仅仅是最低收入的影响。

相似文献

1
Income and risk of mortality after spinal cord injury.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Mar;92(3):339-45. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.09.032.
2
Health status, community integration, and economic risk factors for mortality after spinal cord injury.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 Nov;85(11):1764-73. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.06.062.
3
Risk and Protective Factors for Cause-Specific Mortality After Spinal Cord Injury.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Oct;97(10):1669-78. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.07.001. Epub 2016 Jul 20.
5
Risk factors for mortality after spinal cord injury in the USA.
Spinal Cord. 2013 May;51(5):413-8. doi: 10.1038/sc.2013.2. Epub 2013 Feb 5.
6
Association of race, socioeconomic status, and health care access with pressure ulcers after spinal cord injury.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Jun;93(6):972-7. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2012.02.004. Epub 2012 Apr 10.
7
Risk of mortality after spinal cord injury: an 8-year prospective study.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Oct;90(10):1708-15. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.04.020.
8
Comparison of Demographics Across the Burn, Spinal Cord Injury, and Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2024 Nov;105(11):2160-2165. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2024.07.012. Epub 2024 Aug 2.
10
Health, secondary conditions, and life expectancy after spinal cord injury.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Nov;92(11):1770-5. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.05.024.

引用本文的文献

3
Life expectancy and long-term survival after traumatic spinal cord injury: a systematic review.
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2024 Oct;60(5):822-831. doi: 10.23736/S1973-9087.24.08462-4. Epub 2024 Jun 5.
4
Delay of Surgery for Spinal Metastasis due to the COVID-19 Outbreak Affected Patient Outcomes.
Neurospine. 2023 Dec;20(4):1431-1442. doi: 10.14245/ns.2346726.363. Epub 2023 Dec 31.
6
Life Satisfaction Trend and Mortality After Traumatic Spinal Cord Injury: A Cohort Study.
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2023 Winter;29(1):33-41. doi: 10.46292/sci22-00090. Epub 2023 Feb 15.
7
Investigating the Challenges and Benefits of Engaging in Peer Support via Videoconferencing for People with Spinal Cord Injury.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 11;19(8):4585. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19084585.
8
A national survey of physical activity after spinal cord injury.
Sci Rep. 2022 Mar 15;12(1):4405. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-07927-5.
9
Socioeconomic consequences of traumatic and non-traumatic spinal cord injuries: a Danish nationwide register-based study.
Spinal Cord. 2022 Jul;60(7):647-654. doi: 10.1038/s41393-021-00724-3. Epub 2022 Jan 9.
10

本文引用的文献

2
Risk of mortality after spinal cord injury: an 8-year prospective study.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Oct;90(10):1708-15. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.04.020.
3
Risk of mortality after spinal cord injury: relationship with social support, education, and income.
Spinal Cord. 2009 Aug;47(8):592-6. doi: 10.1038/sc.2009.15. Epub 2009 Mar 3.
4
Economic factors and longevity in spinal cord injury: a reappraisal.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008 Mar;89(3):572-4. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2007.11.025.
5
Trends in life expectancy after spinal cord injury.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006 Aug;87(8):1079-85. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.04.022.
6
Widening socioeconomic inequalities in US life expectancy, 1980-2000.
Int J Epidemiol. 2006 Aug;35(4):969-79. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyl083. Epub 2006 May 9.
8
Allostatic load: a mechanism of socioeconomic health disparities?
Biol Res Nurs. 2005 Jul;7(1):7-15. doi: 10.1177/1099800405278216.
9
Accuracy of world-wide-web death searches for persons with traumatic brain injury.
Brain Inj. 2004 Nov;18(11):1155-62. doi: 10.1080/02699050410001672323.
10
Health status, community integration, and economic risk factors for mortality after spinal cord injury.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 Nov;85(11):1764-73. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2004.06.062.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验