Ibis Reproductive Health, 17 Dunster Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
Womens Health Issues. 2011 Mar-Apr;21(2):104-9. doi: 10.1016/j.whi.2010.11.006.
In the United States, ectopic pregnancies are relatively common and associated with significant maternal morbidity and mortality. The Ethical and Religious Directives for Catholic Health Care Services (the Directives) govern the provision of care in Catholic-affiliated hospitals and prohibit the provision of abortion in almost all circumstances. Although ectopic pregnancies are not viable, some Catholic ethicists have argued that the Directives preclude physicians at Catholic hospitals from managing tubal pregnancies with methods and procedures that involve "direct" action against the embryo.
We undertook this qualitative study to explore the relationship between the Directives, hospital policies regarding ectopic pregnancy management, and clinical practices. We recruited participants at non-Catholic, longstanding Catholic, and recently merged facilities and conducted focused interviews with 24 physicians at 16 hospitals in 10 states.
Participants from three Catholic facilities reported that medical therapy with methotrexate was not offered because of their hospitals' religious affiliation. The lack of methotrexate resulted in changes in counseling and practice patterns, including managing ectopic pregnancies expectantly, providing the medication surreptitiously, and transferring patients to other facilities. Further, several physicians reported that, before initiating treatment, they were required to document nonviability through what they perceived as unnecessary paperwork, tests, and imaging studies.
Our findings suggest that some interpretations of the Directives are precluding physicians from providing women with ectopic pregnancies with information about and access to a full range of treatment options and are resulting in practices that delay care and may expose women to unnecessary risks.
在美国,宫外孕较为常见,且会导致产妇出现严重的发病率和死亡率。《天主教医疗保健服务的伦理与宗教指令》(以下简称《指令》)规范了天主教学院附属医院的护理服务,并禁止在几乎所有情况下提供堕胎服务。尽管宫外孕无法存活,但一些天主教伦理学家认为,《指令》禁止天主教医院的医生采用涉及“直接”针对胚胎的方法和程序来治疗输卵管妊娠。
我们进行了这项定性研究,旨在探讨《指令》、医院关于宫外孕管理的政策以及临床实践之间的关系。我们在非天主教、长期的天主教和最近合并的机构中招募参与者,并在 10 个州的 16 家医院对 24 名医生进行了重点访谈。
来自 3 家天主教机构的参与者报告说,由于他们医院的宗教背景,他们的医院不提供甲氨蝶呤的药物治疗。缺乏甲氨蝶呤导致咨询和实践模式发生变化,包括期待治疗宫外孕、秘密提供药物以及将患者转移到其他机构。此外,一些医生报告说,在开始治疗之前,他们需要通过他们认为不必要的文书工作、检查和成像研究来记录胚胎的非存活状态。
我们的研究结果表明,对《指令》的某些解释可能会阻止医生向宫外孕患者提供全面治疗选择的信息和机会,并导致延迟护理的做法,使患者面临不必要的风险。