Department of Health Care Organization and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1720 2(nd) Ave South RPHB 320, Birmingham, AL, 35294.
Department of Health Care Organization and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 1720 2(nd) Ave South RPHB 320, Birmingham, AL, 35294.
Contraception. 2019 Jan;99(1):48-51. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2018.09.006. Epub 2018 Oct 1.
To compare pregnancy options counseling and referral practices at state- and Title X-funded family planning organizations in Texas after enforcement of a policy restricting abortion referrals for providers participating in state-funded programs, which differed from Title X guidelines to provide referrals for services upon request.
Between November 2014 and February 2015, we conducted in-depth interviews with administrators at publicly funded family planning organizations in Texas about how they integrated primary care and family planning services, including pregnancy options counseling and referrals for unplanned pregnancies. We conducted a thematic analysis of transcripts related to organizations' pregnancy options counseling and referral practices, and compared themes across organizations that did and did not receive Title X funding.
Of the 37 organizations with transcript segments on options counseling and referrals, 15 received Title X and 22 relied on state funding only. All Title X-funded organizations but only nine state-funded organizations reported offering pregnancy options counseling. Respondents at state-only-funded organizations often described directing pregnant women exclusively to prenatal care. Regardless of funding source, most organizations provided women a list of agencies offering abortion, adoption and prenatal care. However, some respondents expressed concern that providing other information about abortion would threaten their state funding. In contrast, respondents indicated staff would make appointments for prenatal care, assist with Medicaid applications and, in some instances, directly connect women with adoption-related services.
Pregnancy options counseling varied by organizations' funding guidelines. Additionally, abortion referrals were less common than referrals for other pregnancy-related care.
Programmatic guidelines restricting information on abortion counseling and referrals may adversely affect care for pregnant women at publicly funded family planning organizations.
在德克萨斯州对参与州立项目的提供者实施限制堕胎转介的政策后,比较州和 X 标题资助的计划生育组织在妊娠选择咨询和转介实践方面的情况,该政策与 X 标题指南不同,要求根据请求提供服务转介。
在 2014 年 11 月至 2015 年 2 月期间,我们对德克萨斯州公共资助计划生育组织的管理人员进行了深入访谈,了解他们如何整合初级保健和计划生育服务,包括妊娠选择咨询和意外怀孕转介。我们对与组织妊娠选择咨询和转介实践相关的转录本进行了主题分析,并比较了接受和不接受 X 标题资助的组织之间的主题。
在有选择咨询和转介转录片段的 37 个组织中,有 15 个组织接受了 X 标题资助,有 22 个组织仅依赖州资助。所有接受 X 标题资助的组织都报告提供了妊娠选择咨询,但只有 9 个州资助的组织提供了妊娠选择咨询。仅依赖州资助的组织的受访者通常描述将孕妇仅转介到产前护理。无论资金来源如何,大多数组织都会为女性提供提供堕胎、收养和产前护理机构的名单。然而,一些受访者表示担心提供有关堕胎的其他信息会威胁到他们的州资助。相比之下,受访者表示工作人员会为产前护理预约,协助申请医疗补助,并在某些情况下直接为妇女提供与收养相关的服务。
妊娠选择咨询因组织的资助指南而异。此外,堕胎转介的情况比其他与妊娠相关的护理转介要少。
限制有关堕胎咨询和转介信息的项目指南可能会对公共资助计划生育组织中孕妇的护理产生不利影响。