Suppr超能文献

琼斯第五跖骨骨折的空心螺钉固定:钛合金与不锈钢螺钉固定的比较

Cannulated screw fixation of Jones fifth metatarsal fractures: a comparison of titanium and stainless steel screw fixation.

作者信息

DeVries J George, Cuttica Daniel J, Hyer Christopher F

机构信息

Ripon Medical Center, Ripon, WI, USA.

出版信息

J Foot Ankle Surg. 2011 Mar-Apr;50(2):207-12. doi: 10.1053/j.jfas.2010.12.019.

Abstract

The classic Jones fracture involves the fifth metatarsal at the level of the proximal diaphyseal-metaphyseal junction. The mainstay of surgical treatment for the Jones fracture is intramedullary screw fixation. There is no consensus of the type or material of screw that should be used. The purpose of this retrospective cohort study was to test the hypothesis that there is no clinical difference in the incidence of healing, or complications, when comparing stainless steel to titanium cannulated screws used in Jones fracture open-reduction internal fixation (ORIF). Data were collected on a total of 53 patients (fractures) that were fixed with either cannulated titanium screws (Ti group) or cannulated stainless steel screws (SS group). The postoperative protocol was standardized. The mean time to radiographic union was 11.7 ± 5.1 weeks in the Ti group and 13.4 ± 5.7 weeks in the SS group (P = .333). The overall union rate for the Ti group was 36/37 (97%) and 14/16 (88%) in the SS group (P = .213). Complications were rare in both groups, and the prevalence was not statistically significantly different (P > .05). There was 1 patient with an asymptomatic radiographic nonunion in the Ti group, and this patient elected not to undergo revision. There were 2 nonunions in the SS group. One was revised and went on to heal and the other is awaiting revision. Our study has demonstrated the decision to use stainless steel or titanium can be left to patient constraints, such as allergies, or physician preference without compromising the clinical result.

摘要

经典的琼斯骨折累及第五跖骨近端骨干-干骺端交界处。琼斯骨折手术治疗的主要方法是髓内螺钉固定。对于应使用的螺钉类型或材料尚无共识。这项回顾性队列研究的目的是检验以下假设:在比较用于琼斯骨折切开复位内固定(ORIF)的不锈钢空心螺钉和钛空心螺钉时,愈合率或并发症发生率在临床上没有差异。总共收集了53例使用空心钛螺钉(钛组)或空心不锈钢螺钉(不锈钢组)固定的患者(骨折)的数据。术后方案标准化。钛组影像学愈合的平均时间为11.7±5.1周,不锈钢组为13.4±5.7周(P = 0.333)。钛组的总体愈合率为36/37(97%),不锈钢组为14/16(88%)(P = 0.213)。两组并发症均少见,发生率无统计学显著差异(P>0.05)。钛组有1例患者影像学显示无症状骨不连,该患者选择不接受翻修手术。不锈钢组有2例骨不连。1例进行了翻修并愈合,另1例等待翻修。我们的研究表明,使用不锈钢或钛的决定可以根据患者的限制因素,如过敏情况,或医生的偏好来做出,而不会影响临床结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验