Strong K A, Lipworth W, Kerridge I
Centre for Values, Ethics and the Law in Medicine, University of Sydney, Australia.
J Law Med. 2010 Dec;18(2):316-9.
The past two decades have been witness to an "empirical turn" in bioethics. Whereas once this field of study concerned itself purely with theoretical analysis of ethical issues emerging in the design and delivery of health care, increasingly bioethics has embraced a range of empirical research methods from the social sciences and humanities. The emergence of "empirical bioethics" has, however, been the subject of enormous debate, both in regard to its methods and its purpose. For the most part these criticisms fail to appreciate the assumptions that underpin empirical bioethics or misrepresent the claims that are made about its moral utility. This article provides a brief account of the assumptions, strengths and limitations of empirical bioethics.
在过去二十年里,生物伦理学经历了一场“实证转向”。曾经,这一研究领域仅仅专注于对医疗保健设计与提供过程中出现的伦理问题进行理论分析,而如今,生物伦理学越来越多地采用了一系列来自社会科学和人文学科的实证研究方法。然而,“实证生物伦理学”的出现引发了广泛的争论,涉及到其方法和目的。在很大程度上,这些批评没有理解支撑实证生物伦理学的假设,或者歪曲了关于其道德效用的主张。本文简要介绍了实证生物伦理学的假设、优势和局限性。