Muraszko K M, Oldfield E H
Section of Neurosurgery, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor.
Neurosurg Clin N Am. 1990 Jul;1(3):631-52.
Current techniques of diagnosis and treatment allow for earlier detection, precise delineation of the vascular anatomy, and, most important, successful treatment of most patients with spinal AVMs. Magnetic resonance imaging is useful in the initial assessment of patients with progressive myelopathy but cannot replace myelography or arteriography in screening patients who may have a spinal AVM. The most common variety of spinal AVM is a dural arteriovenous fistula. Dural arteriovenous fistulas cause cord injury by producing venous congestion, and symptoms can be reversed by elimination of venous congestion of the spinal cord. Dural arteriovenous fistulas can be treated successfully by interrupting the arteriovenous fistula either in the dura or by disconnecting the dural fistula from the coronal venous plexus in the subarachnoid space. This can be done by interrupting the medullary vein that drains the arterial blood from the dural fistula into the coronal venous plexus of the spinal cord. Stripping of the engorged venous network on the surface of the spinal cord is unwarranted and may cause further cord injury. In dural arteriovenous fistulas embolization is often beneficial in patients with acute neurologic deterioration, to permit time for stabilization and improvement in spinal cord hemodynamics and in cord function before neurosurgical intervention is undertaken. Embolization also may be indicated in patients with intradural spinal AVMs in which surgery cannot be performed safely. Although embolic occlusion does not permanently occlude most intradural AVMs, it often permits stabilization of neurologic function and may be repeated later if neurologic dysfunction returns or progresses. Although the outcome after treatment is dependent on the type and location of the spinal AVM, as in most treatable neurologic disorders the functional outcome of patients with spinal AVMs is directly related to their neurologic condition at the time of treatment. Patients with minimal dysfunction, and with easily accessible AVMs, such as dural arteriovenous fistulas, have the greatest chance for useful recovery or stabilization. Since these patients represent the largest number of patients with spinal AVMs, they must be diagnosed and treated early to achieve the best possible outcome.
目前的诊断和治疗技术能够实现早期检测、精确描绘血管解剖结构,最重要的是,能成功治疗大多数脊髓动静脉畸形(AVM)患者。磁共振成像(MRI)在进行性脊髓病患者的初始评估中很有用,但在筛查可能患有脊髓AVM的患者时,它无法替代脊髓造影或动脉造影。最常见的脊髓AVM类型是硬脊膜动静脉瘘。硬脊膜动静脉瘘通过导致静脉充血引起脊髓损伤,消除脊髓静脉充血可使症状逆转。硬脊膜动静脉瘘可通过在硬脊膜内中断动静脉瘘或在蛛网膜下腔将硬脊膜瘘与冠状静脉丛分离来成功治疗。这可以通过中断将硬脊膜瘘的动脉血引流到脊髓冠状静脉丛的髓静脉来实现。剥离脊髓表面充血的静脉网络是不必要的,而且可能会导致进一步的脊髓损伤。对于急性神经功能恶化的硬脊膜动静脉瘘患者,栓塞术通常有益,以便在进行神经外科干预之前,有时间使脊髓血流动力学和脊髓功能稳定并改善。对于无法安全进行手术的硬脊膜内脊髓AVM患者,也可能需要进行栓塞术。虽然栓塞闭塞不能永久性地闭塞大多数硬脊膜内AVM,但它通常能使神经功能稳定,如果神经功能障碍复发或进展,以后还可再次进行栓塞。尽管治疗后的结果取决于脊髓AVM的类型和位置,但与大多数可治疗的神经系统疾病一样,脊髓AVM患者的功能结局直接与其治疗时的神经状况相关。功能障碍最小且AVM易于接近的患者,如硬脊膜动静脉瘘患者,最有可能获得有效的恢复或病情稳定。由于这些患者占脊髓AVM患者的大多数,因此必须早期诊断和治疗,以获得最佳结果。