• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

伊朗结直肠癌筛查方法的成本效益分析。

Cost-effectiveness analysis of colorectal cancer screening methods in Iran.

机构信息

Faculty of Pharmacy, Shaheed Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

Arch Iran Med. 2011 Mar;14(2):110-4.

PMID:21361717
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Screening can prevent colorectal cancer from becoming advanced by early detection of precancerous lesions. Cost-effectiveness analysis of colorectal cancer screening methods is highly necessary due to increased prevalence, decreased age at onset and the limited budget in Iran.

METHODS

Methods of screening currently available in Iran were selected. A systematic search revealed the sensitivity and specificity of each method. For this study, a model for a 20 year screening period of a population of 100,000 apparently healthy persons of ages 45-65 years in Isfahan Province was used. The cost-effectiveness of each method and the ratio of cost-effectiveness were calculated based on this model.

RESULTS

The most and the least effective methods were CT colonography and fecal occult blood test, respectively. The highest and lowest expenditures in the governmental sector were related to fecal occult blood test and flexible sigmoidoscopy and in the private sector, to CT colonography and fecal occult blood test, respectively. The cost per cancer detected in 20 years of screening in the governmental sector was 0.28, 0.22 and 0.42 billion Rials, respectively for screening by colonoscopy, flexible sigmoidoscopy and fecal occult blood test. In the private sector, these were 1.54 (colonoscopy), 1.68 (flexible sigmoidoscopy), and 1.60 (fecal occult blood test) billion and 2.58 billion Rials for CT colonography, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Although CT colonography is the most effective method, it needs a budget of 2.58 billion Rials for each screened patient. If costs in the governmental sector are considered, flexible sigmoidoscopy would be the most cost-effective method for screening the 45 - 65-year-old population in Iran.

摘要

简介

通过早期检测癌前病变,筛查可以预防结直肠癌的进展。由于伊朗结直肠癌的发病率增加、发病年龄降低以及预算有限,因此非常有必要对结直肠癌的筛查方法进行成本效益分析。

方法

选择了伊朗目前可用的筛查方法。系统搜索揭示了每种方法的敏感性和特异性。对于这项研究,使用了一个模型,对伊朗伊斯法罕省 10 万名年龄在 45-65 岁之间的貌似健康人群进行了 20 年的筛查。根据该模型,计算了每种方法的成本效益和成本效益比。

结果

最有效的方法和最不有效的方法分别是 CT 结肠成像和粪便潜血试验。在政府部门,粪便潜血试验和乙状结肠镜检查的支出最高,而在私营部门,CT 结肠成像和粪便潜血试验的支出最低。在政府部门,20 年筛查中每发现一个癌症的成本分别为结肠镜检查、乙状结肠镜检查和粪便潜血试验筛查的 2.8 亿、2.2 亿和 4.2 亿里亚尔。在私营部门,分别为 CT 结肠成像的 15.4 亿里亚尔(结肠镜检查)、16.8 亿里亚尔(乙状结肠镜检查)和 16 亿里亚尔(粪便潜血试验)和 25.8 亿里亚尔。

结论

虽然 CT 结肠成像检查是最有效的方法,但它需要为每个筛查患者提供 25.8 亿里亚尔的预算。如果考虑政府部门的成本,乙状结肠镜检查是伊朗 45-65 岁人群筛查最具成本效益的方法。

相似文献

1
Cost-effectiveness analysis of colorectal cancer screening methods in Iran.伊朗结直肠癌筛查方法的成本效益分析。
Arch Iran Med. 2011 Mar;14(2):110-4.
2
Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening colonoscopy vs. sigmoidoscopy and alternative strategies.筛查结肠镜检查与乙状结肠镜检查和其他策略的比较效果和成本效益。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Jan;108(1):120-32. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.380. Epub 2012 Dec 18.
3
Cost-effectiveness modeling of colorectal cancer: computed tomography colonography vs colonoscopy or fecal occult blood tests.结直肠癌的成本效益建模:计算机断层结肠成像与结肠镜检查或粪便潜血试验比较。
Eur J Radiol. 2012 Jul;81(7):1413-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2011.03.027. Epub 2011 Mar 27.
4
Health benefits and cost-effectiveness of a hybrid screening strategy for colorectal cancer.结直肠癌混合筛查策略的健康获益和成本效益。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Sep;11(9):1158-66. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.03.013. Epub 2013 Mar 28.
5
Clinical use of CT colonography for colorectal cancer screening in military training facilities and potential impact on HEDIS measures.CT 结肠成像在军事训练设施中用于结直肠癌筛查的临床应用及其对 HEDIS 措施的潜在影响。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2013 Jan;10(1):30-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2012.05.014.
6
Cost-effectiveness analysis on screening for colorectal neoplasm and management of colorectal cancer in Asia.亚洲结直肠肿瘤筛查及结直肠癌管理的成本效益分析
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008 Aug 1;28(3):353-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2008.03726.x.
7
A literature review of assumptions on test characteristics and adherence in economic evaluations of colonoscopy and CT-colonography screening.关于结肠镜检查和CT结肠成像筛查的经济评估中测试特征和依从性假设的文献综述。
Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jun;45(9):1554-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2009.01.032. Epub 2009 Mar 2.
8
Cost-effectiveness of colonoscopy in screening for colorectal cancer.结肠镜检查在结直肠癌筛查中的成本效益
Ann Intern Med. 2000 Oct 17;133(8):573-84. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-133-8-200010170-00007.
9
Comparative economic evaluation of data from the ACRIN National CT Colonography Trial with three cancer intervention and surveillance modeling network microsimulations.ACRIN 全国 CT 结肠成像试验数据与三个癌症干预和监测建模网络微观模拟的比较经济评估。
Radiology. 2011 Nov;261(2):487-98. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11102411. Epub 2011 Aug 3.
10
Cost effectiveness and projected national impact of colorectal cancer screening in France.法国结直肠癌筛查的成本效益和预期的全国影响。
Endoscopy. 2011 Sep;43(9):780-93. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1256409. Epub 2011 May 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Costs and outcomes of colorectal cancer screening program in Isfahan, Iran.伊朗伊斯法罕的结直肠癌筛查计划的成本和结果。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Jan 5;23(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-09010-1.
2
Cancer diagnostic tools to aid decision-making in primary care: mixed-methods systematic reviews and cost-effectiveness analysis.癌症诊断工具辅助初级保健决策:混合方法系统评价和成本效益分析。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Nov;24(66):1-332. doi: 10.3310/hta24660.
3
Cost-effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Screening and Treatment Methods: Mapping of Systematic Reviews.
结直肠癌筛查与治疗方法的成本效益:系统评价图谱
Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs. 2018 Jan-Mar;5(1):57-67. doi: 10.4103/apjon.apjon_50_17.
4
Quality Assessment of Published Articles in Iranian Journals Related to Economic Evaluation in Health Care Programs Based on Drummond's Checklist: A Narrative Review.基于德拉蒙德清单对伊朗期刊中与医疗保健项目经济评估相关的已发表文章的质量评估:一项叙述性综述
Iran J Med Sci. 2017 Sep;42(5):427-436.
5
A Pilot Study of CK19, CK20 and GCC mRNA in the Peripheral Blood as a Colorectal Cancer Biomarker Panel.一项关于外周血中CK19、CK20和GCC mRNA作为结直肠癌生物标志物组合的初步研究。
Int J Mol Cell Med. 2016 Winter;5(1):30-6.
6
Colorectal Cancer Screening Based on Age and Gender: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.基于年龄和性别的结直肠癌筛查:一项成本效益分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 Mar;95(10):e2739. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000002739.
7
National Guidelines for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Saudi Arabia with strength of recommendations and quality of evidence.沙特阿拉伯结直肠癌筛查国家指南,附推荐强度和证据质量说明。
Ann Saudi Med. 2015 May-Jun;35(3):189-95. doi: 10.5144/0256-4947.2015.189.
8
Do economic evaluation studies inform effective healthcare resource allocation in Iran? A critical review of the literature.经济评估研究是否为伊朗有效的医疗资源分配提供了信息?文献综述。
Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2014 Jul 11;12:15. doi: 10.1186/1478-7547-12-15. eCollection 2014.
9
Improved real-time rt-PCR assays of two colorectal cancer peripheral blood mRNA biomarkers: a pilot study.两种结直肠癌外周血mRNA生物标志物的实时rt-PCR检测方法改进:一项初步研究。
Iran Biomed J. 2013;17(1):15-21. doi: 10.6091/ibj.1104.2012.