• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

GSTP1 多态性与乳腺癌化疗反应和毒性的差异有关。

Polymorphisms of GSTP1 is associated with differences of chemotherapy response and toxicity in breast cancer.

机构信息

Center of Breast Diseases and Department of Abdominal Surgery, Cancer Institute and Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100021, China.

出版信息

Chin Med J (Engl). 2011 Jan;124(2):199-204.

PMID:21362365
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although chemotherapy is one of the most important treatments of breast cancer, it is limited by significant inter-individual variations in response and toxicity. The metabolism of epirubicin (EPI) and cyclophosphamide (CTX) is mainly mediated by cytochrome P450s (CYPs) and glutathione S-transferases (GSTs). It has been well-known that the activities of these enzymes are polymorphic in population due to their genetic polymorphisms. The aim of this research was to examine the effects of genetic polymorphisms in CYP3A, GSTP1 and MDR1 genes on treatment response and side-effects of breast cancer patients receiving EPI/CTX chemotherapy.

METHODS

One hundred and twenty patients with stage II or III invasive breast cancer were recruited and treated with three to four cycles of EPI 80 mg/m(2) and CTX 600 mg/m(2) every two weeks. The AJCC TNM staging system (sixth edition) was used to evaluate the pathological response of primary tumor and axillary lymph nodes. The genotypes of gene polymorphisms were determined by using PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism methods.

RESULTS

Patients carrying GSTP1 (105)Ile/Val or (105)Ile/Ile genotype were more likely to have good response (OR, 0.40; 95%CI, 0.16 - 0.96; P = 0.024) and light toxicity (OR, 0.35; 95%CI, 0.13 - 0.78; P = 0.006) than those carrying (105)Val/Val genotypes. The response to the treatment was not correlated with estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor and Her2/neu status of tumors. No correlation was found between toxicity effect and patient's age, tumor staging, menopause status, and dose intensity of the drugs.

CONCLUSION

GSTP1 polymorphism was associated with the chemotherapy response or adverse effects of EPI and CTX regimens.

摘要

背景

尽管化疗是乳腺癌最重要的治疗方法之一,但由于个体间反应和毒性存在显著差异,其应用受到限制。表阿霉素(EPI)和环磷酰胺(CTX)的代谢主要由细胞色素 P450 酶(CYPs)和谷胱甘肽 S-转移酶(GSTs)介导。由于其遗传多态性,这些酶的活性在人群中呈多态性,这一点早已为人所知。本研究旨在探讨 CYP3A、GSTP1 和 MDR1 基因的遗传多态性对接受 EPI/CTX 化疗的乳腺癌患者治疗反应和不良反应的影响。

方法

招募了 120 名 II 期或 III 期浸润性乳腺癌患者,每 2 周接受 3 至 4 个周期的 EPI 80 mg/m²和 CTX 600 mg/m²治疗。采用 AJCC TNM 分期系统(第六版)评估原发肿瘤和腋窝淋巴结的病理反应。采用 PCR-限制性片段长度多态性方法确定基因多态性的基因型。

结果

携带 GSTP1(105)Ile/Val 或(105)Ile/Ile 基因型的患者更有可能获得良好的反应(OR,0.40;95%CI,0.16 - 0.96;P = 0.024)和较轻的毒性(OR,0.35;95%CI,0.13 - 0.78;P = 0.006),而携带(105)Val/Val 基因型的患者则不然。治疗反应与肿瘤的雌激素受体、孕激素受体和 Her2/neu 状态无关。未发现毒性作用与患者年龄、肿瘤分期、绝经状态和药物剂量强度之间存在相关性。

结论

GSTP1 多态性与 EPI 和 CTX 方案的化疗反应或不良反应相关。

相似文献

1
Polymorphisms of GSTP1 is associated with differences of chemotherapy response and toxicity in breast cancer.GSTP1 多态性与乳腺癌化疗反应和毒性的差异有关。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2011 Jan;124(2):199-204.
2
GSTT1, GSTM1, and GSTP1 polymorphisms and chemotherapy response in locally advanced breast cancer.谷胱甘肽S-转移酶T1、M1和P1基因多态性与局部晚期乳腺癌化疗反应的关系
Genet Mol Res. 2010 Jun 11;9(2):1045-53. doi: 10.4238/vol9-2gmr726.
3
[Establishment of a multiplex ligation-dependent SNP genotyping method and its application in the detection of genes related to chemotherapeutic drugs in breast cancer].
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi. 2009 Feb;31(2):108-13.
4
Effect of GSTP1 and ABCC4 gene polymorphisms on response and toxicity of cyclophosphamide-epirubicin-5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy in Bangladeshi breast cancer patients.谷胱甘肽S-转移酶P1(GSTP1)和ATP结合盒转运体C4(ABCC4)基因多态性对孟加拉乳腺癌患者环磷酰胺-表柔比星-5-氟尿嘧啶化疗疗效及毒性的影响
Tumour Biol. 2015 Jul;36(7):5451-7. doi: 10.1007/s13277-015-3211-y. Epub 2015 Feb 13.
5
Detection and relevance of germline genetic polymorphisms in glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) in breast cancer patients from northern Indian population.印度北部人群乳腺癌患者谷胱甘肽S-转移酶(GSTs)种系基因多态性的检测及其相关性
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009 Jun;115(3):537-43. doi: 10.1007/s10549-008-0098-y. Epub 2008 Jun 24.
6
Multiple Genetic Polymorphisms of GSTP1 313AG, MDR1 3435CC, and MTHFR 677CC highly correlated with early relapse of breast cancer patients in Taiwan.谷胱甘肽S-转移酶P1(GSTP1)313AG、多药耐药基因1(MDR1)3435CC和亚甲基四氢叶酸还原酶(MTHFR)677CC的多个基因多态性与台湾乳腺癌患者的早期复发高度相关。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 Mar;15(3):872-80. doi: 10.1245/s10434-007-9719-7. Epub 2007 Dec 19.
7
Polymorphisms in p53, GSTP1 and XRCC1 predict relapse and survival of gastric cancer patients treated with oxaliplatin-based adjuvant chemotherapy.p53、GSTP1和XRCC1基因多态性可预测接受奥沙利铂辅助化疗的胃癌患者的复发和生存情况。
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2009 Oct;64(5):1001-7. doi: 10.1007/s00280-009-0956-2. Epub 2009 Feb 27.
8
Polymorphisms in manganese superoxide dismutase, myeloperoxidase and glutathione-S-transferase and survival after treatment for metastatic breast cancer.锰超氧化物歧化酶、髓过氧化物酶和谷胱甘肽-S-转移酶的多态性与转移性乳腺癌治疗后的生存率
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008 Sep;111(1):93-101. doi: 10.1007/s10549-007-9764-8. Epub 2007 Oct 7.
9
Pharmacogenetic association between GSTP1 genetic polymorphism and febrile neutropenia in Japanese patients with early breast cancer.日本早期乳腺癌患者中谷胱甘肽S-转移酶P1(GSTP1)基因多态性与发热性中性粒细胞减少症之间的药物遗传学关联
Breast Cancer. 2016 Mar;23(2):195-201. doi: 10.1007/s12282-014-0547-x. Epub 2014 Jul 10.
10
Glutathione S-transferase M1, T1 and P1 polymorphisms: susceptibility and outcome in lung cancer patients.谷胱甘肽S-转移酶M1、T1和P1基因多态性:肺癌患者的易感性及预后
J Exp Ther Oncol. 2008;7(1):73-85.

引用本文的文献

1
Influence of Genetic Variation of GST, CYP, and ABC on the Safety and Efficacy of Cyclophosphamide-Based Therapy.谷胱甘肽S-转移酶、细胞色素P450和ATP结合盒转运蛋白的基因变异对环磷酰胺治疗安全性和有效性的影响
Clin Transl Sci. 2025 Jul;18(7):e70301. doi: 10.1111/cts.70301.
2
Gene variants, oxidative stress and inflammation in Colombian populations.哥伦比亚人群中的基因变异、氧化应激与炎症
Biomedica. 2025 May 30;45(2):244-266. doi: 10.7705/biomedica.7220.
3
Advances in drug resistance of triple negative breast cancer caused by pregnane X receptor.
孕烷X受体导致的三阴性乳腺癌耐药性研究进展
World J Clin Oncol. 2023 Sep 24;14(9):335-342. doi: 10.5306/wjco.v14.i9.335.
4
Investigating the Role of Glutathione S- Transferase Genes, Histopathological and Molecular Subtypes, Gene-Gene Interaction and Its Susceptibility to Breast Carcinoma in Ethnic North- Indian Population.探讨谷胱甘肽 S-转移酶基因、组织病理学和分子亚型、基因-基因相互作用及其对印度北部族群乳腺癌易感性的作用。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2022 Oct 1;23(10):3481-3490. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2022.23.10.3481.
5
GSTP1 c.313A > G mutation is an independent risk factor for neutropenia hematotoxicity induced by anthracycline-/paclitaxel-based chemotherapy in breast cancer patients.GSTP1 c.313A>G 突变是蒽环类/紫杉醇为基础的化疗引起乳腺癌患者中性粒细胞减少性血液毒性的一个独立危险因素。
World J Surg Oncol. 2022 Jun 22;20(1):212. doi: 10.1186/s12957-022-02679-y.
6
An Example of Personalized Treatment in HR+ HER2+ Long Survivor Breast Cancer Patient (Case Report).一例 HR+/HER2+ 长生存乳腺癌患者的个体化治疗(病例报告)。
Curr Oncol. 2021 May 25;28(3):1980-1987. doi: 10.3390/curroncol28030184.
7
Genetic Influences in Breast Cancer Drug Resistance.乳腺癌耐药中的遗传影响
Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press). 2021 Feb 9;13:59-85. doi: 10.2147/BCTT.S284453. eCollection 2021.
8
Impact of xenobiotic-metabolizing gene polymorphisms on breast cancer risk in South Indian women.外源性代谢基因多态性对印度南部妇女乳腺癌风险的影响。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2021 Apr;186(3):823-837. doi: 10.1007/s10549-020-06028-z. Epub 2021 Jan 4.
9
The Identification of Admixture Patterns Could Refine Pharmacogenetic Counseling: Analysis of a Population-Based Sample in Mexico.混合模式的识别可优化药物遗传学咨询:对墨西哥一个基于人群的样本的分析。
Front Pharmacol. 2020 Apr 22;11:324. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2020.00324. eCollection 2020.
10
The Relation between Polymorphisms in Exon 5 and Exon 6 of GSTP1 Gene and the Risk of Lung Cancer in Iranian People.谷胱甘肽S-转移酶P1基因第5外显子和第6外显子多态性与伊朗人群肺癌风险的关系
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2019 May 25;20(5):1503-1509. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2019.20.5.1503.