• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过利用情况审查减少医院使用和支出。一项结果评估的发现。

Reducing hospital use and expenditures through utilization review. Findings from an outcome evaluation.

作者信息

Wickizer T M, Feldstein P J, Wheeler J R, McDonald M C

机构信息

Department of Health Services, University of Washington, Seattle 98195.

出版信息

Qual Assur Util Rev. 1990 Aug;5(3):80-5. doi: 10.1177/0885713x9000500303.

DOI:10.1177/0885713x9000500303
PMID:2136669
Abstract

Utilization review (UR) has become a prominent approach to cost containment now used by almost 65% of private group insurance plans. Although insurers have increasingly relied on UR to contain health care costs, until recently little was known about the effects of this cost containment approach. This article reviews some of the key findings of a UR evaluation, based on analysis of claims data on 223 insured groups for the years 1984 through 1986. The evaluation found that UR reduced admissions by 12%, inpatient expenditures by 8%, and total expenditures by 6%. It was estimated that UR generated net savings of $115 per employee per year. Groups adopting UR with high baseline rates of hospital use had larger expenditure reductions and greater net savings. It appears that UR can play an important role in private cost containment and help improve medical care resource consumption.

摘要

利用审查(UR)已成为一种重要的成本控制方法,目前近65%的私人团体保险计划都在使用。尽管保险公司越来越依赖利用审查来控制医疗保健成本,但直到最近,人们对这种成本控制方法的效果知之甚少。本文基于对1984年至1986年223个参保团体的索赔数据的分析,回顾了利用审查评估的一些关键发现。评估发现,利用审查使住院率降低了12%,住院支出降低了8%,总支出降低了6%。据估计,利用审查每年为每位员工节省了115美元的净成本。采用利用审查且医院使用基线率较高的团体,其支出降幅更大,净节省成本更多。看来,利用审查在私人成本控制中可以发挥重要作用,并有助于改善医疗资源的消耗。

相似文献

1
Reducing hospital use and expenditures through utilization review. Findings from an outcome evaluation.通过利用情况审查减少医院使用和支出。一项结果评估的发现。
Qual Assur Util Rev. 1990 Aug;5(3):80-5. doi: 10.1177/0885713x9000500303.
2
The effects of utilization review on hospital use and expenditures: a covariance analysis.利用审查对医院使用情况和支出的影响:协方差分析
Health Serv Res. 1992 Apr;27(1):103-21.
3
Have hospital inpatient cost containment programs contributed to the growth in outpatient expenditures? Analysis of the substitution effect associated with hospital utilization review.医院住院费用控制计划是否推动了门诊支出的增长?与医院利用审查相关的替代效应分析。
Med Care. 1991 May;29(5):442-51. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199105000-00005.
4
Private cost containment. The effects of utilization review programs on health care use and expenditures.私人成本控制。利用审查计划对医疗保健使用和支出的影响。
N Engl J Med. 1988 May 19;318(20):1310-4. doi: 10.1056/NEJM198805193182006.
5
Does utilization review reduce unnecessary hospital care and contain costs?利用审查是否能减少不必要的住院治疗并控制成本?
Med Care. 1989 Jun;27(6):632-47. doi: 10.1097/00005650-198906000-00006.
6
Utilization review savings at the micro level.微观层面的利用情况审查节省费用。
Med Care. 1992 Nov;30(11):1043-52. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199211000-00007.
7
Utilization management as a cost-containment strategy.
Health Care Financ Rev Annu Suppl. 1991:87-93.
8
The effects of UR on hospital use.尿酸(UR)对医院医疗使用情况的影响。
Bus Health. 1988 Jul;5(9):28-30.
9
Hospital utilization review: past experience, future directions.医院利用情况审查:过去的经验,未来的方向。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1988 Winter;13(4):683-704. doi: 10.1215/03616878-13-4-683.
10
The impact of utilization review on costs and utilization.
Dev Health Econ Public Policy. 1992;1:47-62. doi: 10.1007/978-94-011-2392-1_3.

引用本文的文献

1
Decision support for concurrent utilization review using a HELP-embedded expert system.使用嵌入 HELP 的专家系统进行并发利用审查的决策支持。
Proc Annu Symp Comput Appl Med Care. 1993:176-82.
2
Computerized decision support for concurrent utilization review using the HELP system.使用 HELP 系统进行并发利用审查的计算机化决策支持。
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 1994 Jul-Aug;1(4):339-52. doi: 10.1136/jamia.1994.95236169.