Department of Health Policy & Management, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
BMC Palliat Care. 2011 Mar 3;10:3. doi: 10.1186/1472-684X-10-3.
The combined effects of the patient's and the family's preferences for death at home have in determining the actual site of death has not been fully investigated. We explored this issue on patients who had been receiving end-of-life care from Visiting Nurse Stations (VNS). In Japan, it has been the government's policy to promote end-of-life care at home by expanding the use of VNS services.
A retrospective national survey of a random sample of 2,000 out of the 5,224 VNS was made in January 2005. Questionnaires were mailed to VNS asking the respondents to fill in the questionnaire for each patient who had died either at home or at the hospital from July to December of 2004. Logistic regression analysis was respectively carried out to examine the factors related to dying at home for cancer and non-cancer patients.
We obtained valid responses from 1,016 VNS (50.8%). The total number of patients who had died in the selected period was 4,175 (cancer: 1,664; non-cancer: 2,511). Compared to cancer patients, non-cancer patients were older and had more impairment in activities of daily living (ADL) and cognitive performance, and a longer duration of care. The factor having the greatest impact for dying at home was that of both the patient and the family expressing such preferences [cancer: OR (95% CI) = 57.00 (38.79-83.76); non-cancer: OR (95% CI) = 12.33 (9.51-15.99)]. The Odds ratio was greater compared with cases in which only the family had expressed such a preference and in which only the patient had expressed such a preference. ADL or cognitive impairment and the fact that their physician was based at a clinic, and not at a hospital, had modest effects on dying at home.
Dying at home was more likely when both the patient and the family had expressed such preferences, than when the patient alone or the family alone had done so, in both cancer and non-cancer patients. Health care professionals should try to elicit the patient's and family's preferences on where they would wish to die, following which they should then take appropriate measures to achieve this outcome.
患者及其家属对在家中去世的偏好的综合影响在决定实际死亡地点方面尚未得到充分研究。我们对从临终关怀护士站(VNS)接受临终关怀的患者进行了此项研究。在日本,通过扩大 VNS 服务的使用,政府一直将促进在家中进行临终关怀作为其政策。
2005 年 1 月,对 VNS 的 5224 名随机样本中的 2000 名进行了回顾性全国性调查。向 VNS 发送了问卷,要求受访者为 2004 年 7 月至 12 月期间在 VNS 家中或医院死亡的每位患者填写问卷。分别进行逻辑回归分析,以检查与癌症和非癌症患者在家中死亡相关的因素。
我们从 1016 个 VNS(50.8%)中获得了有效回复。在选定的时间段内,死亡的患者总数为 4175 人(癌症:1664 人;非癌症:2511 人)。与癌症患者相比,非癌症患者年龄较大,日常生活活动(ADL)和认知能力受损程度更高,护理时间更长。对在家中死亡影响最大的因素是患者和家属都表达了这种偏好[癌症:OR(95%CI)= 57.00(38.79-83.76);非癌症:OR(95%CI)= 12.33(9.51-15.99)]。与仅家庭表达这种偏好以及仅患者表达这种偏好的情况相比,OR 值更大。ADL 或认知障碍以及其医生在诊所而不是医院工作的事实,对在家中死亡有一定影响。
在癌症和非癌症患者中,与仅患者或仅家庭表达这种偏好相比,当患者和家属都表达了这种偏好时,更有可能在家中死亡。卫生保健专业人员应尝试了解患者及其家属对希望死亡地点的偏好,然后采取适当的措施来实现这一目标。