• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[急诊科严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者对脓毒症集束化治疗的依从率研究]

[A study of rate of compliance with sepsis bundle in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock in emergency department].

作者信息

Zhu Ying, Tao Ran-jun, Shi Wen, Tong Jian-jing, Lu Yi-ming

机构信息

Department of Emergency of Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China.

出版信息

Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2011 Mar;23(3):138-41.

PMID:21366940
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the occurrence of severe sepsis and septic shock and the rate of compliance with sepsis bundle in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock in emergency department.

METHODS

A prospective study was conducted on consecutive adult patients who were sent to Emergency Department of Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine by ambulance from May to June in 2009. The occurrence of severe sepsis and septic shock, and the number of the patients in whom who met the criteria of compliance with sepsis bundle were analyzed.

RESULTS

Nine hundred and seventeen patients who were sent to the emergency department by ambulance in that period were enrolled in the study. The number of patients with severe sepsis and septic shock was 96. The incidence of severe sepsis and septic shock was 10.47%. Among these patients, the number of patients in whom the sepsis bundle was complied, i.e. sepsis bundle, appropriate cultures were taken before antimicrobial therapy, placement of central venous catheter and monitoring of central venous pressure (CVP) as well as central venous oxygen saturation (ScvO₂) within 2 hours, antibiotic therapy within 3 hours, early goal directed therapy (EGDT) within 6 hours, and lactate clearance in 12 hours reached 1.04%, 3.12%, 2.08%, 83.33%, 1.04%, 23.96%. The Results were 1.19%, 3.57%, 2.38%, 83.33%, 1.19%, 26.19% and 0, 0, 0, 83.33%, 0, 8.33% in medical and surgical emergency department respectively. There was no statistical difference between the two divisions (all P>0.05).

CONCLUSION

The incidence of severe sepsis and septic shock was high in emergency department, but the rate of recognition of it and the compliance with sepsis bundle were inadequate. It is urgently necessary to enhance the learning and implementation of the guideline.

摘要

目的

评估急诊科严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克的发生率以及脓毒症集束化治疗的依从率。

方法

对2009年5月至6月由救护车送至上海交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院急诊科的成年连续患者进行前瞻性研究。分析严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克的发生情况以及符合脓毒症集束化治疗标准的患者数量。

结果

该时期内917例由救护车送至急诊科的患者纳入研究。严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者96例,发生率为10.47%。这些患者中,符合脓毒症集束化治疗标准,即脓毒症集束化治疗、在抗菌治疗前采集合适的培养标本、在2小时内放置中心静脉导管并监测中心静脉压(CVP)以及中心静脉血氧饱和度(ScvO₂)、在3小时内进行抗生素治疗、在6小时内进行早期目标导向治疗(EGDT)以及在12小时内实现乳酸清除的患者比例分别为1.04%、3.12%、2.08%、83.33%、1.04%、23.96%。在内科和外科急诊科的结果分别为1.19%、3.57%、2.38%、83.33%、1.19%、26.19%以及0、0、0、83.33%、0、8.33%。两个科室之间无统计学差异(所有P>0.05)。

结论

急诊科严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克的发生率较高,但对其的识别率和脓毒症集束化治疗的依从率不足。迫切需要加强指南的学习与实施。

相似文献

1
[A study of rate of compliance with sepsis bundle in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock in emergency department].[急诊科严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者对脓毒症集束化治疗的依从率研究]
Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2011 Mar;23(3):138-41.
2
Implementation of a bundle of quality indicators for the early management of severe sepsis and septic shock is associated with decreased mortality.实施一系列用于严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克早期管理的质量指标与死亡率降低相关。
Crit Care Med. 2007 Apr;35(4):1105-12. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000259463.33848.3D.
3
Early goal-directed therapy, corticosteroid, and recombinant human activated protein C for the treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock in the emergency department.急诊科早期目标导向治疗、皮质类固醇及重组人活化蛋白C治疗严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克
Acad Emerg Med. 2006 Jan;13(1):109-13. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2005.08.005. Epub 2005 Dec 19.
4
[The impact of sepsis bundles on mortality in patients with sepsis shock: a prospective clinical study].[脓毒症集束化治疗对脓毒症休克患者死亡率的影响:一项前瞻性临床研究]
Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2008 Sep;20(9):534-7.
5
Factors influencing compliance with early resuscitation bundle in the management of severe sepsis and septic shock.影响严重脓毒症和感染性休克早期复苏包管理依从性的因素。
Shock. 2012 Nov;38(5):474-9. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0b013e31826eea2b.
6
Resuscitation bundle compliance in severe sepsis and septic shock: improves survival, is better late than never.严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克中复苏集束化治疗的依从性:可提高生存率,亡羊补牢,为时未晚。
J Intensive Care Med. 2011 Sep-Oct;26(5):304-13. doi: 10.1177/0885066610392499. Epub 2011 Jan 10.
7
An audit of compliance with the sepsis resuscitation care bundle in patients admitted to A&E with severe sepsis or septic shock.对因严重脓毒症或脓毒性休克入住急诊科的患者进行脓毒症复苏护理集束方案依从性审计。
Int Emerg Nurs. 2008 Oct;16(4):250-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ienj.2008.05.008. Epub 2008 Aug 8.
8
[Adherence to international guidelines on early management in severe sepsis and septic shock].[遵循严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克早期管理的国际指南]
Biomedica. 2012 Sep;32(3):449-56. doi: 10.1590/S0120-41572012000300015.
9
Early goal-directed therapy (EGDT) for severe sepsis/septic shock: which components of treatment are more difficult to implement in a community-based emergency department?针对严重脓毒症/脓毒性休克的早期目标导向治疗(EGDT):在社区急诊科中,治疗的哪些组成部分更难以实施?
J Emerg Med. 2012 May;42(5):503-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2011.03.024. Epub 2011 May 5.
10
Comparison of Predisposition, Insult/Infection, Response, and Organ dysfunction, Acute Physiology And Chronic Health Evaluation II, and Mortality in Emergency Department Sepsis in patients meeting criteria for early goal-directed therapy and the severe sepsis resuscitation bundle.比较符合早期目标导向治疗和严重脓毒症复苏包标准的急诊脓毒症患者的易感性、损伤/感染、反应和器官功能障碍、急性生理学和慢性健康评估 II 以及死亡率。
J Crit Care. 2012 Aug;27(4):362-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2011.08.013. Epub 2011 Oct 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Early goal-directed resuscitation for patients with severe sepsis and septic shock: a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis.严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者的早期目标导向性复苏:一项荟萃分析和试验序贯分析
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2016 Mar 5;24:23. doi: 10.1186/s13049-016-0214-7.