• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

被动抬腿可预测重症脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者的容量反应性

[Passive leg raising predicts volume responsiveness in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock].

作者信息

Huang Lei, Zhang Wei-xing, Cai Wen-xun, Zhu Zhong-sheng, Zhang Chi, Jiang Chun-ling

机构信息

Intensive Care Unit, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen 518036, Guangdong, China.

出版信息

Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2011 Mar;23(3):154-7.

PMID:21366944
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the role of passive leg raising (PLR) test in predicting volume responsiveness in severe sepsis and septic shock patients.

METHODS

Thirty severe sepsis and septic shock patients in intensive care unit (ICU) of Peking University Shenzhen Hospital were prospectively observed from February 2009 to January 2010. The hemodynamics including stroke volume (SV), cardiac output (CO) and systemic vascular resistance (SVR) were measured non invasively by ultrasonic cardiac output monitor (USCOM) device in the supine position, during PLR and after volume expansion (VE), and invasive arterial blood pressure and central venous pressure (CVP) were monitored consecutively. Responders were defined by the appearance of an increase in SV (ΔSV) ≥ 15% after VE. The role of PLR for predicting volume responsiveness was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

RESULTS

The CVP (cm H(2)O, 1 cm H(2)O=0.098 kPa) during PLR was increased compared with that at supine position in both responder group ( n =15) and non responder group ( n =15, 13.6 ± 6.6 vs. 12.1 ± 6.0, 11.9 ± 5.5 vs. 10.8 ± 5.2 , both P <0.01). ΔSV was higher in responder group than in non responder group during PLR [(16.6 ± 5.5)% vs. (3.8 ± 8.2)%, P=0.000].ΔSV during PLR was highly correlated to ΔSV after VE (r =0.681 , P =0.000).The area under the ROC curve (AUC) for PLR predicting volume responsiveness was 0.944 ± 0.039 ( P =0.000). The ΔSV>11% during PLR was found to predict volume responsiveness with a sensitivity of 86.7%, specificity of 93.3%, positive predictive value of 92.9% and negative predictive value of 87.5%.

CONCLUSION

PLR can be used generally to predict volume responsiveness accurately in severe sepsis and septic shock patients, and it can be used to direct clinical practice.

摘要

目的

评估被动抬腿(PLR)试验在预测严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者容量反应性中的作用。

方法

对2009年2月至2010年1月北京大学深圳医院重症监护病房(ICU)的30例严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者进行前瞻性观察。采用超声心输出量监测仪(USCOM)在仰卧位、PLR期间及容量扩充(VE)后无创测量包括每搏输出量(SV)、心输出量(CO)和全身血管阻力(SVR)在内的血流动力学指标,并连续监测有创动脉血压和中心静脉压(CVP)。以VE后SV增加(ΔSV)≥15%定义为反应者。通过受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线评估PLR预测容量反应性的作用。

结果

反应者组(n = 15)和非反应者组(n = 15)在PLR期间的CVP(cm H₂O,1 cm H₂O = 0.098 kPa)均高于仰卧位时(反应者组:13.6±6.6 vs. 12.1±6.0;非反应者组:11.9±5.5 vs. 10.8±5.2,均P < 0.01)。PLR期间反应者组的ΔSV高于非反应者组[(16.6±5.5)% vs.(3.8±8.2)%,P = 0.000]。PLR期间的ΔSV与VE后的ΔSV高度相关(r = 0.681,P = 0.000)。PLR预测容量反应性的ROC曲线下面积(AUC)为0.944±0.039(P = 0.000)。发现PLR期间ΔSV>11%预测容量反应性的敏感度为86.7%,特异度为93.3%,阳性预测值为92.9%,阴性预测值为87.5%。

结论

PLR可普遍用于准确预测严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者的容量反应性,并可指导临床实践。

相似文献

1
[Passive leg raising predicts volume responsiveness in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock].被动抬腿可预测重症脓毒症和脓毒性休克患者的容量反应性
Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2011 Mar;23(3):154-7.
2
[Clinical observation of non-invasive ultrasonic cardiac output monitor combined passive leg raising test in predicting the children volume responsiveness].无创超声心输出量监测联合被动抬腿试验预测儿童容量反应性的临床观察
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2014 Jan;26(1):46-50. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2014.01.010.
3
[Clinical observation of passive leg raising combined with non invasive cardiac output monitoring system in predicting volume responsiveness].被动抬腿联合无创心输出量监测系统预测容量反应性的临床观察
Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2011 Mar;23(3):146-9.
4
[Passive leg raising predicts volume responsiveness in patients with septic shock].被动抬腿试验可预测感染性休克患者的容量反应性
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2011 Jan 1;49(1):44-8.
5
[Passive leg raising combined with echocardiography could evaluate volume responsiveness in patients with septic shock].被动抬腿联合超声心动图可评估感染性休克患者的容量反应性
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2019 May;31(5):619-622. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2019.05.019.
6
[The value of passive leg raising test in predicting fluid responsiveness in patients with sepsis-induced cardiac dysfunction].[被动抬腿试验在预测脓毒症诱发心功能不全患者液体反应性中的价值]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2015 Sep;27(9):729-34.
7
Effect of two volume responsiveness evaluation methods on fluid resuscitation and prognosis in septic shock patients.两种容量反应性评估方法对感染性休克患者液体复苏及预后的影响。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2014;127(3):483-7.
8
[The value of changes in end-tidal carbon dioxide pressure induced by passive leg raising test in predicting fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients with septic shock].[被动抬腿试验诱导的呼气末二氧化碳分压变化在预测感染性休克机械通气患者液体反应性中的价值]
Zhonghua Nei Ke Za Zhi. 2013 Aug;52(8):646-50.
9
Brachial cuff measurements of blood pressure during passive leg raising for fluid responsiveness prediction.在被动抬腿期间进行肱动脉袖带血压测量以预测液体反应性。
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 2012 May;31(5):e67-72. doi: 10.1016/j.annfar.2012.01.032. Epub 2012 Mar 29.
10
[A prospective clinical study of pleth variability index in prediction of volume responsiveness in patients with septic shock].[脉搏波变异指数预测感染性休克患者容量反应性的前瞻性临床研究]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2015 Jan;27(1):17-21. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-4352.2015.01.005.