Suppr超能文献

临床判断与治疗决策

Clinical judgment and therapeutic decision making.

作者信息

Hlatky M A, Califf R M, Harrell F E, Lee K L, Mark D B, Muhlbaier L H, Pryor D B

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina.

出版信息

J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990 Jan;15(1):1-14. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(90)90167-n.

Abstract

Clinical decision making is under increased scrutiny due to concerns about the cost and quality of medical care. Variability in physician decision making is common, in part because of deficiencies in the knowledge base, but also due to the difference in physicians' approaches to clinical problem solving. Evaluation of patient prognosis is a critical factor in the selection of therapy, and careful attention to methodology is essential to provide reliable information. Randomized controlled clinical trials provide the most solid basis for the establishment of broad therapeutic principles. Because randomized studies cannot be performed to address every question, observational studies will continue to play a complementary role in the evaluation of therapy. Randomized studies in progress, meta analyses of existing data, and increased use of administrative and collaborative clinical data bases will improve the knowledge base for decision making in the future.

摘要

由于对医疗成本和质量的担忧,临床决策受到了越来越多的审视。医生决策的差异性很常见,部分原因是知识库存在缺陷,但也由于医生解决临床问题的方法不同。对患者预后的评估是治疗选择的关键因素,仔细关注方法对于提供可靠信息至关重要。随机对照临床试验为确立广泛的治疗原则提供了最坚实的基础。由于无法进行随机研究来解决每一个问题,观察性研究将继续在治疗评估中发挥补充作用。正在进行的随机研究、对现有数据的荟萃分析以及行政和协作临床数据库的更多使用,将改善未来决策的知识库。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验