The CRISMA Laboratory, Department of Critical Care Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, 3550 Terrace Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15261, USA.
Crit Care. 2011;15(1):205. doi: 10.1186/cc9411. Epub 2011 Feb 16.
Sepsis is the primary cause of death in the intensive care unit. Extracorporeal blood purification therapies have been proposed for patients with sepsis in order to improve outcomes since these therapies can alter the host inflammatory response by non-selective removal of inflammatory mediators or bacterial products or both. Recent technological progress has increased the number of techniques available for blood purification and their performance. In this overview, we report on the latest advances in blood purification for sepsis and how they relate to current concepts of disease, and we review the current evidence for high-volume hemofiltration, cascade hemofiltration, hemoadsorption, coupled plasma filtration adsorption, high-adsorption hemofiltration, and high-cutoff hemofiltration/hemodialysis. Promising results have been reported with all of these blood purification therapies, showing that they are well tolerated, effective in clearing inflammatory mediators or bacterial toxins (or both) from the plasma, and efficacious for improvement of various physiologic outcomes (for example, hemodynamics and oxygenation). However, numerous questions, including the timing, duration, and frequency of these therapies in the clinical setting, remain unanswered. Large multicenter trials evaluating the ability of these therapies to improve clinical outcomes (that is, mortality or organ failure), rather than surrogate markers such as plasma mediator clearance or transient improvement in physiologic variables, are required to define the precise role of blood purification in the management of sepsis.
脓毒症是重症监护病房患者死亡的主要原因。已经提出了体外血液净化疗法用于脓毒症患者,以改善预后,因为这些疗法可以通过非选择性清除炎症介质或细菌产物或两者兼而有之来改变宿主炎症反应。最近的技术进步增加了可用于血液净化的技术数量及其性能。在这篇综述中,我们报告了脓毒症血液净化的最新进展及其与当前疾病概念的关系,并回顾了大容量血液滤过、级联血液滤过、血液吸附、血浆滤过吸附、高吸附血液滤过和高截止血液滤过/血液透析的当前证据。所有这些血液净化疗法都报告了有希望的结果,表明它们具有良好的耐受性,能有效地从血浆中清除炎症介质或细菌毒素(或两者兼而有之),并能有效地改善各种生理结果(例如,血流动力学和氧合)。然而,仍有许多问题尚未得到解答,包括这些疗法在临床环境中的时机、持续时间和频率。需要进行大型多中心试验,评估这些疗法改善临床结局(即死亡率或器官衰竭)的能力,而不是评估血浆介质清除或生理变量的短暂改善等替代标志物,以确定血液净化在脓毒症管理中的确切作用。