SOS Mains Orléans, Val-de-Loire, Polyclinique des Longues-Allées, 45800 Saint-Jean-de-Braye, France.
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2011 Apr;97(2):164-71. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2010.11.006. Epub 2011 Mar 2.
Chronic scapholunate instability can lead to functional deficits and radiocarpal osteoarthritis. A number of procedures, namely scapho-trapezio-trapezoid (STT) fusion, scaphocapitate (SC) fusion or soft tissue reconstruction procedures, aim to improve function while protecting the wrist from osteoarthritis.
Define the role of scaphocapitate fusion in comparison to STT fusion and capsulodesis and ligament reconstruction.
A clinical, radiographic and functional evaluation was performed on 31 SC fusion cases with an average follow-up of 5 years.
Range of motion was 41° in flexion and 39° in extension. Radial-ulnar deviation was 43°. Strength was 32.5 kgf (Jamar). The DASH was 27% and the PRWE was 25%. Fifty percent of the wrists were pain-free at rest. Ninety-four percent of patients were satisfied with the procedure. Seventy-eight percent of patients had returned to their occupation. Radiographic analysis revealed that consolidation was obtained at 10.1weeks. The postoperative radioscaphoid angle was 55° with good radioscaphoid congruence. There was no osteoarthritis in the radioscaphoid joint in 84% of the cases. The non-union rate was 13%.
These data are similar to the few series that exist. STT fusion leads the same clinical results, but it is technically more difficult and has a higher rate of complications. Capsulodesis and ligament reconstruction provide the same functional results as SC fusion, but with slightly less stiffening. However, these techniques do not seem to protect the wrist from arthritic degeneration at longer follow-up. SC fusion is superior to STT fusion for the treatment of chronic scapholunate instability. This is a pain-relieving intervention with good clinical results and preservation of scaphoid stability. As a component of the surgeon's armamentarium, it can be held in the same regard as capsulodesis and ligament reconstruction for cases of chronic scapholunate instability with a non-reducible scaphoid, or after failure of a soft tissue reconstruction procedure.
Level 4, retrospective study.
慢性舟月骨不稳定可导致功能障碍和腕骨关节炎。许多手术,如舟状骨-大多角骨-小多角骨(STT)融合、舟骨-头状骨(SC)融合或软组织重建手术,旨在改善功能的同时保护腕关节免受关节炎的影响。
定义 SC 融合与 STT 融合、囊内固定和韧带重建相比的作用。
对 31 例 SC 融合患者进行了临床、影像学和功能评估,平均随访 5 年。
掌屈 41°,背伸 39°。桡偏和尺偏 43°。握力为 32.5kgf(Jamar)。DASH 评分为 27%,PRWE 评分为 25%。50%的腕关节在休息时无痛。94%的患者对手术满意。78%的患者已恢复工作。影像学分析显示,10.1 周时获得了骨融合。术后舟状骨-桡骨角为 55°,舟状骨-桡骨吻合良好。84%的病例中舟状骨-桡骨关节无关节炎。骨不连率为 13%。
这些数据与现有的少数系列相似。STT 融合可取得相同的临床效果,但技术难度较大,并发症发生率较高。囊内固定和韧带重建可提供与 SC 融合相同的功能结果,但僵硬程度略低。然而,在更长的随访时间内,这些技术似乎并不能保护腕关节免受关节炎的退行性变。SC 融合治疗慢性舟月骨不稳定优于 STT 融合。这是一种缓解疼痛的干预措施,具有良好的临床效果,并能保持舟骨的稳定性。作为外科医生手术工具的一部分,它可以与囊内固定和韧带重建一样,用于治疗慢性舟月骨不稳定,舟骨不可复位,或软组织重建手术失败。
4 级,回顾性研究。