• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关怀伦理:医疗保健中的角色义务与适度偏爱。

The ethics of care: role obligations and moderate partiality in health care.

机构信息

Section for Medical Ethics, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, PO 1130, Blindern, NO-0318 Oslo, Norway.

出版信息

Nurs Ethics. 2011 Mar;18(2):192-200. doi: 10.1177/0969733010388926.

DOI:10.1177/0969733010388926
PMID:21372232
Abstract

This article contends that an ethics of care has a particular moral ontology that makes it suitable to argue for the normative significance of relational responsibilities within professional health care. This ontology is relational. It means that moral choices always have to account for the web of relationships, the relational networks and responsibilities that are an essential part of particular moral circumstances. Given this ontology, the article investigates the conditions for health care professionals to be partial and to act on the basis of particular responsibilities to their patients. We will argue that priorities could be partial in three ways: first, because there may be exceptional circumstances that allow for giving priority to one patient over another; second, because the integrity of the patient and a health care worker may be connected in special ways; and, finally, even if impartiality is essential, the institutional basis of health care must always give ample space for an ethically qualified individual and personal care for patients. Even if difficult priorities may be necessary, the conditions of institutional health care should always seek to create the prerequisites for nurses and doctors to administer proper care.

摘要

本文认为,关怀伦理有一种特殊的道德本体论,使其适合在专业医疗保健中论证关系责任的规范性意义。这种本体论是关系性的。这意味着道德选择必须考虑到关系网络,以及作为特定道德情境的重要组成部分的关系网络和责任。鉴于这种本体论,本文探讨了医疗保健专业人员偏袒和根据对患者的特殊责任采取行动的条件。我们将认为,优先次序可以从以下三个方面偏倚:第一,因为可能存在特殊情况,允许优先考虑一个病人而不是另一个病人;第二,因为病人和医疗工作者的完整性可能以特殊的方式联系在一起;最后,即使公正性是必不可少的,医疗保健机构的基础也必须始终为有道德资质的个人和对病人的个人护理提供充分的空间。即使需要做出艰难的优先选择,机构医疗保健的条件也应该始终寻求为护士和医生提供适当护理创造前提。

相似文献

1
The ethics of care: role obligations and moderate partiality in health care.关怀伦理:医疗保健中的角色义务与适度偏爱。
Nurs Ethics. 2011 Mar;18(2):192-200. doi: 10.1177/0969733010388926.
2
Commentary: Care tactics--arguments, absences and assumptions in relational ethics.评论:关怀策略——关系伦理学中的论点、缺失与假设
Nurs Ethics. 2011 Mar;18(2):243-54; discussion 262-71. doi: 10.1177/0969733010393070.
3
A personalist approach to care ethics.关怀伦理的人格主义进路。
Nurs Ethics. 2011 Mar;18(2):161-73. doi: 10.1177/0969733010388924.
4
Researching lived experience in health care: significance for care ethics.研究医疗保健中的生活体验:关怀伦理的意义。
Nurs Ethics. 2011 Mar;18(2):232-42. doi: 10.1177/0969733010389253.
5
Care transformations: attentiveness, professional ethics and thoughts towards differentiation.护理转变:专注、职业道德与差异化思考
Nurs Ethics. 2011 Mar;18(2):258-61. doi: 10.1177/0969733010396818.
6
Is there a distinctive care ethics?是否存在独特的关怀伦理学?
Nurs Ethics. 2011 Mar;18(2):184-91. doi: 10.1177/0969733010389431.
7
Three versions of an ethics of care.关怀伦理学的三个版本。
Nurs Philos. 2009 Oct;10(4):231-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-769X.2009.00415.x.
8
Caring, objectivity and justice: an integrative view.关爱、客观公正:综合视角。
Nurs Ethics. 2011 Mar;18(2):149-60. doi: 10.1177/0969733010388927.
9
Towards a strong virtue ethics for nursing practice.迈向适用于护理实践的强大美德伦理学。
Nurs Philos. 2006 Jul;7(3):110-24. doi: 10.1111/j.1466-769X.2006.00268.x.
10
Mature care in professional relationships and health care prioritizations.专业关系中的成熟关怀和医疗保健优先级。
Nurs Ethics. 2011 Mar;18(2):209-16. doi: 10.1177/0969733010389257.

引用本文的文献

1
The experience of nurses when providing care across acts that may be perceived as death hastening: A qualitative evidence synthesis.护士在提供可能被视为加速死亡行为的护理时的经历:一项定性证据综合分析。
Palliat Med. 2025 Jun;39(6):644-664. doi: 10.1177/02692163251331162. Epub 2025 Apr 29.
2
A care ethical perspective on family caregiver burden and support.从关怀伦理学视角看家庭照顾者的负担与支持
Nurs Ethics. 2025 Mar 4;32(6):9697330251324294. doi: 10.1177/09697330251324294.
3
Towards an ethical multiplicity in low back pain care: Practising beyond the biopsychosocial model.
迈向腰痛治疗中的伦理多元性:超越生物心理社会模式的实践。
Sociol Health Illn. 2023 Mar;45(3):522-541. doi: 10.1111/1467-9566.13598. Epub 2022 Dec 21.
4
I Am Not Just a Nurse: The Need for a Boundaried Ethic of Care in the Context of Prolific Relationality.我不只是一名护士:在多产关系背景下对有界限的护理伦理的需求。
J Bus Ethics. 2022 Sep 10:1-18. doi: 10.1007/s10551-022-05246-3.
5
Professionals' narratives of interactions with patients' families in intensive care.专业人员对与重症监护病房患者家属互动的叙述。
Nurs Ethics. 2022 Jun;29(4):885-898. doi: 10.1177/09697330211050995. Epub 2022 Feb 24.
6
Real-world ethics in palliative care: A systematic review of the ethical challenges reported by specialist palliative care practitioners in their clinical practice.姑息治疗中的现实世界伦理:对姑息治疗专科从业者在临床实践中报告的伦理挑战的系统评价。
Palliat Med. 2021 Feb;35(2):315-334. doi: 10.1177/0269216320974277. Epub 2020 Dec 10.
7
Will my patients get their residence permit? A critical analysis of the ethical dilemmas involved in writing medical certificates for residence permits in France.我的患者能拿到居留许可吗?对法国为居留许可开具医疗证明所涉及的伦理困境的批判性分析。
BMC Med Ethics. 2020 Jul 13;21(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s12910-020-00500-7.
8
Implementation of a training program to increase knowledge, improve attitudes and reduce nursing care omissions towards patients with dementia in hospital settings: a mixed-method study protocol.在医院环境中实施培训计划以提高知识、改善态度和减少对痴呆症患者护理疏忽的执行情况:一项混合方法研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 19;9(7):e030459. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030459.
9
Ethical challenges of integration across primary and secondary care: a qualitative and normative analysis.初级和二级保健整合的伦理挑战:定性和规范分析。
BMC Med Ethics. 2019 Jul 3;20(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12910-019-0386-6.
10
Thoughts of creation and the discipline of nursing.创造的思想与护理学科
Nurs Open. 2019 Feb 6;6(2):566-573. doi: 10.1002/nop2.239. eCollection 2019 Apr.