Department of Cardiopulmonary Bypass, Fuwai Cardiovascular Hospital, Beijing, China.
Artif Organs. 2011 Mar;35(3):E54-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.2010.01172.x. Epub 2011 Mar 6.
Although benefits of pulsatile flow during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in pediatric heart surgery remain controversial and nonpulsatile CPB is still widely used in clinical cardiac surgery, pulsatile CPB must be reconsidered due to its physiologic features. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the effects of pulsatile perfusion (PP) and nonpulsatile perfusion (NP) on cerebral regional oxygen saturation (rSO₂) and endothelin-1 (ET-1) in pediatric tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) patients undergoing open heart surgery with CPB. Forty pediatric patients were randomly divided into the PP group (n = 20) and the NP group (n = 20). Pulsatile patients used a modified roller pump during the cross-clamp period in CPB, while NP patients used a roller pump with continuous flat flow perfusion. The subjects were monitored for rSO₂ from the beginning of the operation until 6 h after returning to the intensive care unit (ICU). We also monitored the hemodynamic status and ET-1 concentration and plasma free hemoglobin (PFH) in blood samples of all patients over time. Effective PP was monitored in PP patients, and pulse pressure was significantly higher in the PP group than in the NP group (P < 0.01). rSO₂ of the PP group was higher than that of the NP group (P < 0.01) during the cross-clamp period, and this advantage of PP would be maintained until 2 h after patients returned to the ICU (P < 0.05). ET-1 level in blood samples was lower at clamping off and CPB weaning and early ICU period in the PP group than in the NP group (P < 0.01), and ET-1 concentration remained at a normal level after patients were transferred to the ICU 24 h in all patients. PFH levels in the PP group at pre-clamp off and CPB weaned off were higher than those of the NP group (P < 0.05) in these cyanotic patients. PP can increase rSO₂ and improve microcirculation during cross-clamping period in TOF pediatric patients, while PP resulted in more severe hemolysis in these cyanotic patients than NP.
虽然心肺转流(CPB)期间搏动性血流的益处在儿科心脏手术中仍存在争议,并且非搏动性 CPB 仍广泛用于临床心脏手术,但由于其生理特性,必须重新考虑搏动性 CPB。在这项研究中,我们旨在评估搏动性灌注(PP)和非搏动性灌注(NP)对接受 CPB 体外循环心脏手术的小儿法洛四联症(TOF)患者脑局部氧饱和度(rSO₂)和内皮素-1(ET-1)的影响。40 名小儿患者被随机分为 PP 组(n = 20)和 NP 组(n = 20)。CPB 夹闭期间,搏动性患者使用改良滚压泵,而非搏动性患者使用连续平流灌注的滚压泵。从手术开始到返回重症监护病房(ICU)后 6 小时,监测所有患者的 rSO₂。我们还随时间监测所有患者的血流动力学状态和 ET-1 浓度及血浆游离血红蛋白(PFH)。在 PP 患者中监测有效 PP,并且 PP 组的脉压明显高于 NP 组(P < 0.01)。夹闭期间,PP 组的 rSO₂高于 NP 组(P < 0.01),并且这种 PP 的优势将持续到患者返回 ICU 后 2 小时(P < 0.05)。PP 组在夹闭和 CPB 脱机及早期 ICU 期间的 ET-1 水平低于 NP 组(P < 0.01),并且所有患者在转入 ICU 24 小时后 ET-1 浓度保持在正常水平。夹闭前和 CPB 脱机时,PP 组的 PFH 水平高于 NP 组(P < 0.05)。PP 可增加 TOF 小儿患者夹闭期间的 rSO₂并改善微循环,而在这些发绀患者中,PP 导致比 NP 更严重的溶血。