Suppr超能文献

在使用非搏动性泵和主动脉内球囊泵联合进行搏动性心肺转流灌注期间的微血管液体交换。

Microvascular fluid exchange during pulsatile cardiopulmonary bypass perfusion with the combined use of a nonpulsatile pump and intra-aortic balloon pump.

机构信息

Section for Cardiothoracic Surgery, Department of Heart Disease, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.

出版信息

J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Nov;146(5):1275-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2013.06.002. Epub 2013 Jul 30.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate how pulsed versus nonpulsed cardiopulmonary bypass influences microvascular fluid exchange in an experimental setup combining a nonpulsatile perfusion pump and an intra-aortic balloon pump.

METHODS

A total of 16 pigs were randomized to pulsatile cardiopulmonary bypass perfusion with an intra-aortic balloon pump switched to an automatic 80 beats/min mode after the start of cardiopulmonary bypass (pulsatile perfusion [PP] group, n = 8) or to nonpulsatile cardiopulmonary bypass with the pump switched to the off position (nonpulsatile [NP] group, n = 8). Normothermic cardiopulmonary bypass was initiated after 60 minutes of stabilization and continued for 3 hours. The fluid needs, plasma volume, colloid osmotic pressure in plasma, colloid osmotic pressure in interstitial fluid, hematocrit, and total tissue water content were recorded, and the protein masses and fluid extravasation rates were calculated.

RESULTS

After cardiopulmonary bypass was started, the mean arterial pressure increased in the PP group and decreased in the NP group. At 180 minutes, the mean arterial pressure of the PP and NP groups was 70.9 ± 2.7 mm Hg and 55.9 ± 2.7 mm Hg, respectively (P = .004). The central venous pressure (right atrium) had decreased in the NP group (P = .002). A decreasing trend was seen in the PP group. No between-group differences were present. The hematocrit and colloid osmotic pressure in plasma and interstitial fluid had decreased similarly in both study groups during cardiopulmonary bypass. The plasma volume of the PP group had decreased initially but then returned gradually to precardiopulmonary bypass levels. In the NP group, the plasma volume remained contracted (P = .02). No significant differences in the fluid extravasation rate were obtained. The fluid extravasation rate of the PP group tended to stay slightly higher than the fluid extravasation rate of the NP group at all measurement intervals. The total tissue water content increased significantly in a number of organs compared with that in the control animals. However, differences in the total tissue water content between pulsed and nonpulsed perfusion were absent.

CONCLUSIONS

No significant differences in the fluid extravasation rates were present between pulsed and nonpulsed cardiopulmonary bypass perfusion in the present experimental setup.

摘要

目的

评估在结合非搏动性灌注泵和主动脉内球囊泵的实验装置中,搏动性与非搏动性心肺转流对微血管液体交换的影响。

方法

16 头猪被随机分为搏动性心肺转流灌注组(n=8)和非搏动性心肺转流组(n=8)。在心肺转流开始后,使用主动脉内球囊泵将搏动性心肺转流灌注切换至自动 80 次/分钟模式,或切换至关闭位置。在稳定 60 分钟后启动体温心肺转流,持续 3 小时。记录液体需求、血浆容量、血浆胶体渗透压、间质液胶体渗透压、血细胞比容和总组织含水量,并计算蛋白质量和液体外渗率。

结果

心肺转流开始后,搏动性心肺转流灌注组的平均动脉压升高,非搏动性心肺转流组的平均动脉压降低。180 分钟时,搏动性心肺转流灌注组和非搏动性心肺转流组的平均动脉压分别为 70.9±2.7mmHg 和 55.9±2.7mmHg(P=0.004)。非搏动性心肺转流组的中心静脉压(右心房)降低(P=0.002),而搏动性心肺转流灌注组呈下降趋势,但两组间无差异。两组在心肺转流期间,血细胞比容和血浆及间质液胶体渗透压均相似下降。搏动性心肺转流灌注组的血浆容量最初下降,但随后逐渐恢复至心肺转流前水平。而非搏动性心肺转流组的血浆容量持续收缩(P=0.02)。两组间的液体外渗率无显著差异。在所有测量时间间隔内,搏动性心肺转流灌注组的液体外渗率倾向于略高于非搏动性心肺转流灌注组。与对照组动物相比,许多器官的总组织含水量显著增加,但搏动性与非搏动性灌注之间的总组织含水量无差异。

结论

在本实验装置中,搏动性与非搏动性心肺转流灌注的液体外渗率无显著差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验