Kataoka Hajime, Madias John E
Division of Internal Medicine, Nishida Hospital, Oita, Japan.
J Electrocardiol. 2011 May-Jun;44(3):394.e1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2010.12.160. Epub 2011 Mar 3.
Changes in the electrocardiogram QRS amplitudes (ECGΔ) during follow-up of heart failure (HF) patients have not been clinically exploited heretofore.
We examined ECGΔ during follow-up of HF patients by employing 42 triplets of ECGs, other laboratory and HF-related clinical data corresponding to clinical stability, worsening, and recovery from 37 HF patients.
The % changes (Δ%) in the summed QRS amplitude of all 12 leads (ΣQRS(12L)), 6 precordial leads (ΣQRS(V1-V6)), 6 limb leads (ΣQRS(6L)), leads I+II (ΣQRS(I + II)), and lead aVR were evaluated. Also relationships between the ECG variables and body weight (BW), percent body-fat, and B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) were examined. The QRS amplitude(s) in all ECG variables decreased from clinical stability to worsening HF, and returned to baseline at recovery. During HF worsening, Δ% was highest in lead aVR (-15.3 ± 12.3%), followed by Δ% in ΣQRS(6L) (-12.9 ± 10.1%) and ΣQRS(I + II) (-12.1 ± 10.8%). At worsening HF and its recovery, Δ% in ΣQRS(6L) correlated with Δ% in percent body-fat (r = 0.333, P = .031; r = 0.308, P = .047). At recovery, Δ% in each ECG variable correlated with Δ% in BW. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed that ≥16% reduction of ΣQRS(6L) and ΣQRS(I + II) discriminated between stable and worsening HF, with a sensitivity of 43% and 40%, and specificity of 98% for both. ECG variables from limb lead(s) had as good area under the curve (AUC) (0.78-0.84) as BNP (AUC: 0.88) for identifying worsening HF.
Changes of the QRS amplitudes in ECGs are as useful for monitoring HF patients as BNP.
心力衰竭(HF)患者随访期间心电图QRS波振幅变化(ECGΔ)此前尚未在临床上得到应用。
我们通过采用42组来自37例HF患者的心电图三联体、其他实验室检查以及与临床稳定性、病情恶化和恢复相关的HF临床数据,对HF患者随访期间的ECGΔ进行了检查。
评估了全部12导联(ΣQRS(12L))、6个胸前导联(ΣQRS(V1-V6))、6个肢体导联(ΣQRS(6L))、I+II导联(ΣQRS(I + II))和aVR导联的QRS波振幅百分比变化(Δ%)。还检查了心电图变量与体重(BW)、体脂百分比和B型利钠肽(BNP)之间的关系。所有心电图变量中的QRS波振幅从临床稳定期到HF病情恶化时均降低,并在恢复时恢复至基线水平。在HF病情恶化期间,aVR导联的Δ%最高(-15.3±12.3%),其次是ΣQRS(6L)导联的Δ%(-12.9±10.1%)和ΣQRS(I + II)导联的Δ%(-12.1±10.8%)。在HF病情恶化及其恢复时,ΣQRS(6L)导联的Δ%与体脂百分比的Δ%相关(r = 0.333,P = 0.031;r = 0.308,P = 0.047)。在恢复时,每个心电图变量的Δ%与BW的Δ%相关。受试者工作特征(ROC)分析表明,ΣQRS(6L)和ΣQRS(I + II)降低≥16%可区分稳定期和恶化期HF,二者的敏感性均为43%和40%,特异性均为98%。肢体导联的心电图变量在识别HF病情恶化方面与BNP具有相同良好的曲线下面积(AUC)(0.78-0.84)(BNP的AUC:0.88)。
心电图中QRS波振幅变化在监测HF患者方面与BNP同样有用。